Improved processing methods for eddy covariance measurements in calculating sensible heat fluxes at glacier surfaces

Bulk aerodynamic methods have been shown to perform poorly in computing turbulent heat fluxes at glacier surfaces during shallow katabatic winds. Katabatic surface layers have different wind shear and flux profiles to the surface layers for which the bulk methods were developed, potentially invalida...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cole Lord-May, Valentina Radić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Glaciology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214302400039X/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841526535398359040
author Cole Lord-May
Valentina Radić
author_facet Cole Lord-May
Valentina Radić
author_sort Cole Lord-May
collection DOAJ
description Bulk aerodynamic methods have been shown to perform poorly in computing turbulent heat fluxes at glacier surfaces during shallow katabatic winds. Katabatic surface layers have different wind shear and flux profiles to the surface layers for which the bulk methods were developed, potentially invalidating their use in these conditions. In addition, eddy covariance-derived turbulent heat fluxes are unlikely to be representative of surface conditions when eddy covariance data are collected close to the wind speed maximum (WSM). Here we utilize two months of eddy covariance and meteorological data measured at three different heights (1 m, 2 m, and 3 m) at Kaskawulsh Glacier in the Yukon, Canada, to re-examine the performance of bulk methods relative to eddy covariance-derived fluxes under different near-surface flow regimes. We propose a new set of processing methods for one-level eddy covariance data to ensure the validity of calculated fluxes during highly variable flows and low-level wind speed maxima, which leads to improved agreement between eddy covariance-derived and modelled fluxes across all flow regimes, with the best agreement (correlation >0.9) 1 m above the surface. Contrary to previous studies, these results show that adequately processed eddy covariance data collected at or above the WSM can provide valid estimates of surface heat fluxes.
format Article
id doaj-art-e2bbddedd2344a07a408ebf58b2794ad
institution Kabale University
issn 0022-1430
1727-5652
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Glaciology
spelling doaj-art-e2bbddedd2344a07a408ebf58b2794ad2025-01-16T21:47:31ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Glaciology0022-14301727-56522024-01-017010.1017/jog.2024.39Improved processing methods for eddy covariance measurements in calculating sensible heat fluxes at glacier surfacesCole Lord-May0Valentina Radić1Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences (EOAS), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences (EOAS), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaBulk aerodynamic methods have been shown to perform poorly in computing turbulent heat fluxes at glacier surfaces during shallow katabatic winds. Katabatic surface layers have different wind shear and flux profiles to the surface layers for which the bulk methods were developed, potentially invalidating their use in these conditions. In addition, eddy covariance-derived turbulent heat fluxes are unlikely to be representative of surface conditions when eddy covariance data are collected close to the wind speed maximum (WSM). Here we utilize two months of eddy covariance and meteorological data measured at three different heights (1 m, 2 m, and 3 m) at Kaskawulsh Glacier in the Yukon, Canada, to re-examine the performance of bulk methods relative to eddy covariance-derived fluxes under different near-surface flow regimes. We propose a new set of processing methods for one-level eddy covariance data to ensure the validity of calculated fluxes during highly variable flows and low-level wind speed maxima, which leads to improved agreement between eddy covariance-derived and modelled fluxes across all flow regimes, with the best agreement (correlation >0.9) 1 m above the surface. Contrary to previous studies, these results show that adequately processed eddy covariance data collected at or above the WSM can provide valid estimates of surface heat fluxes.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214302400039X/type/journal_articleEnergy balanceglacier meteorologyice/atmosphere interactionsmountain glaciers
spellingShingle Cole Lord-May
Valentina Radić
Improved processing methods for eddy covariance measurements in calculating sensible heat fluxes at glacier surfaces
Journal of Glaciology
Energy balance
glacier meteorology
ice/atmosphere interactions
mountain glaciers
title Improved processing methods for eddy covariance measurements in calculating sensible heat fluxes at glacier surfaces
title_full Improved processing methods for eddy covariance measurements in calculating sensible heat fluxes at glacier surfaces
title_fullStr Improved processing methods for eddy covariance measurements in calculating sensible heat fluxes at glacier surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Improved processing methods for eddy covariance measurements in calculating sensible heat fluxes at glacier surfaces
title_short Improved processing methods for eddy covariance measurements in calculating sensible heat fluxes at glacier surfaces
title_sort improved processing methods for eddy covariance measurements in calculating sensible heat fluxes at glacier surfaces
topic Energy balance
glacier meteorology
ice/atmosphere interactions
mountain glaciers
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S002214302400039X/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT colelordmay improvedprocessingmethodsforeddycovariancemeasurementsincalculatingsensibleheatfluxesatglaciersurfaces
AT valentinaradic improvedprocessingmethodsforeddycovariancemeasurementsincalculatingsensibleheatfluxesatglaciersurfaces