Investigation of the impact of token embeddings in Transformer-based models on short-term tropical cyclone track and intensity predictions

Tropical cyclones (TCs) are destructive meteorological phenomena, necessitating accurate predictions of TC track and intensity to reduce risks to human life. This study evaluates three Transformer-based models – vanilla Transformer (Transformer), inverted Transformer (iTransformer), and temporal-var...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuan-Jiang Zeng, Yi-Qing Ni, Zheng-Wei Chen, Guang-Zhi Zeng, Jia-Yao Wang, Pak-Wai Chan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2025-12-01
Series:Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19942060.2025.2538180
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849705937986650112
author Yuan-Jiang Zeng
Yi-Qing Ni
Zheng-Wei Chen
Guang-Zhi Zeng
Jia-Yao Wang
Pak-Wai Chan
author_facet Yuan-Jiang Zeng
Yi-Qing Ni
Zheng-Wei Chen
Guang-Zhi Zeng
Jia-Yao Wang
Pak-Wai Chan
author_sort Yuan-Jiang Zeng
collection DOAJ
description Tropical cyclones (TCs) are destructive meteorological phenomena, necessitating accurate predictions of TC track and intensity to reduce risks to human life. This study evaluates three Transformer-based models – vanilla Transformer (Transformer), inverted Transformer (iTransformer), and temporal-variate Transformer (TVFormer) – which are trained, validated, and tested on best track data from 1980 to 2021 from the China Meteorological Administration for TC prediction, integrating temporal, variate, and hybrid token embeddings to analyze temporal and variate correlations. Comparative analysis with four recurrent neural network (RNN) models demonstrates the superiority of the refined Transformer models over RNNs: iTransformer reduces mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) by 29.55% and 25.80% (latitude), 50.31% and 46.18% (longitude), 8.71% and 9.98% (pressure), and 8.68% and 9.45% (wind speed), while TVFormer achieves MAE and RMSE reductions of 13.98% and 13.84% (latitude), 39.11% and 38.02% (longitude), 13.69% and 14.02% (pressure), and 12.84% and 12.94% (wind speed) on average. Among Transformer variants, iTransformer excels in track prediction, outperforming Transformer with 21.74% lower MAE and 18.26% lower RMSE for latitude, and 32.73% lower MAE and 24.01% lower RMSE for longitude. TVFormer dominates intensity prediction, reducing pressure errors by 4.42% (MAE) and 3.92% (RMSE) and wind speed errors by 19.21% (MAE) and 14.79% (RMSE) compared to Transformer, while outperforming iTransformer with 4.59% lower MAE and 3.68% lower RMSE for pressure and 3.83% lower MAE and 3.18% lower RMSE for wind speed. Notably, TVFormer also enhances track prediction, with 7.10% reduction in MAE and 7.02% reduction in RMSE for latitude, and 22.84% reduction in MAE and 17.09% reduction in RMSE for longitude compared to Transformer. These results highlight the superiority of iTransformer in track prediction and the efficacy of TVFormer in intensity prediction, thanks to their ability to exploit temporal and variate dependencies, offering potential for TC disaster preparedness systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-e29f65e886ea4a71af43a1d20eba9976
institution DOAJ
issn 1994-2060
1997-003X
language English
publishDate 2025-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
spelling doaj-art-e29f65e886ea4a71af43a1d20eba99762025-08-20T03:16:21ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEngineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics1994-20601997-003X2025-12-0119110.1080/19942060.2025.2538180Investigation of the impact of token embeddings in Transformer-based models on short-term tropical cyclone track and intensity predictionsYuan-Jiang Zeng0Yi-Qing Ni1Zheng-Wei Chen2Guang-Zhi Zeng3Jia-Yao Wang4Pak-Wai Chan5Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of ChinaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of ChinaHong Kong Observatory, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of ChinaTropical cyclones (TCs) are destructive meteorological phenomena, necessitating accurate predictions of TC track and intensity to reduce risks to human life. This study evaluates three Transformer-based models – vanilla Transformer (Transformer), inverted Transformer (iTransformer), and temporal-variate Transformer (TVFormer) – which are trained, validated, and tested on best track data from 1980 to 2021 from the China Meteorological Administration for TC prediction, integrating temporal, variate, and hybrid token embeddings to analyze temporal and variate correlations. Comparative analysis with four recurrent neural network (RNN) models demonstrates the superiority of the refined Transformer models over RNNs: iTransformer reduces mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) by 29.55% and 25.80% (latitude), 50.31% and 46.18% (longitude), 8.71% and 9.98% (pressure), and 8.68% and 9.45% (wind speed), while TVFormer achieves MAE and RMSE reductions of 13.98% and 13.84% (latitude), 39.11% and 38.02% (longitude), 13.69% and 14.02% (pressure), and 12.84% and 12.94% (wind speed) on average. Among Transformer variants, iTransformer excels in track prediction, outperforming Transformer with 21.74% lower MAE and 18.26% lower RMSE for latitude, and 32.73% lower MAE and 24.01% lower RMSE for longitude. TVFormer dominates intensity prediction, reducing pressure errors by 4.42% (MAE) and 3.92% (RMSE) and wind speed errors by 19.21% (MAE) and 14.79% (RMSE) compared to Transformer, while outperforming iTransformer with 4.59% lower MAE and 3.68% lower RMSE for pressure and 3.83% lower MAE and 3.18% lower RMSE for wind speed. Notably, TVFormer also enhances track prediction, with 7.10% reduction in MAE and 7.02% reduction in RMSE for latitude, and 22.84% reduction in MAE and 17.09% reduction in RMSE for longitude compared to Transformer. These results highlight the superiority of iTransformer in track prediction and the efficacy of TVFormer in intensity prediction, thanks to their ability to exploit temporal and variate dependencies, offering potential for TC disaster preparedness systems.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19942060.2025.2538180Tropical cyclonestrackintensityTransformertoken embeddings
spellingShingle Yuan-Jiang Zeng
Yi-Qing Ni
Zheng-Wei Chen
Guang-Zhi Zeng
Jia-Yao Wang
Pak-Wai Chan
Investigation of the impact of token embeddings in Transformer-based models on short-term tropical cyclone track and intensity predictions
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Tropical cyclones
track
intensity
Transformer
token embeddings
title Investigation of the impact of token embeddings in Transformer-based models on short-term tropical cyclone track and intensity predictions
title_full Investigation of the impact of token embeddings in Transformer-based models on short-term tropical cyclone track and intensity predictions
title_fullStr Investigation of the impact of token embeddings in Transformer-based models on short-term tropical cyclone track and intensity predictions
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the impact of token embeddings in Transformer-based models on short-term tropical cyclone track and intensity predictions
title_short Investigation of the impact of token embeddings in Transformer-based models on short-term tropical cyclone track and intensity predictions
title_sort investigation of the impact of token embeddings in transformer based models on short term tropical cyclone track and intensity predictions
topic Tropical cyclones
track
intensity
Transformer
token embeddings
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19942060.2025.2538180
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanjiangzeng investigationoftheimpactoftokenembeddingsintransformerbasedmodelsonshorttermtropicalcyclonetrackandintensitypredictions
AT yiqingni investigationoftheimpactoftokenembeddingsintransformerbasedmodelsonshorttermtropicalcyclonetrackandintensitypredictions
AT zhengweichen investigationoftheimpactoftokenembeddingsintransformerbasedmodelsonshorttermtropicalcyclonetrackandintensitypredictions
AT guangzhizeng investigationoftheimpactoftokenembeddingsintransformerbasedmodelsonshorttermtropicalcyclonetrackandintensitypredictions
AT jiayaowang investigationoftheimpactoftokenembeddingsintransformerbasedmodelsonshorttermtropicalcyclonetrackandintensitypredictions
AT pakwaichan investigationoftheimpactoftokenembeddingsintransformerbasedmodelsonshorttermtropicalcyclonetrackandintensitypredictions