Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture
Objective Single- and double-purse-string suture methods are both widely used in open surgical catheterization for peritoneal dialysis. This study aimed to compare the post-insertion complications and technical survival of the two methods.Methods This retrospective study matched 142 patients who und...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Renal Failure |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2435209 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849762894893285376 |
|---|---|
| author | Xiaoling Li Xiuling Chen Hui Gao Qin Zhou Wenshu Liu Pengli Li Yan Li Shiwen Wang Jin Chen Guisen Li |
| author_facet | Xiaoling Li Xiuling Chen Hui Gao Qin Zhou Wenshu Liu Pengli Li Yan Li Shiwen Wang Jin Chen Guisen Li |
| author_sort | Xiaoling Li |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective Single- and double-purse-string suture methods are both widely used in open surgical catheterization for peritoneal dialysis. This study aimed to compare the post-insertion complications and technical survival of the two methods.Methods This retrospective study matched 142 patients who underwent peritoneal catheterization using the single- (Group S) or double- (Group D) purse-string suture method. Baseline clinical data and complications were recorded, and technical and patient survival rates were evaluated over 3 years.Results There were no significant intergroup differences in terms of infection complication rates (S, 2.8% vs. D, 5.6%, p = 0.377) or non-infection complication rates (2.1% vs. 2.8%, p = 1.000) within the first month post-insertion. The Kaplan–Meier estimates of technical survival at 1, 2, and 3 years were 96.3%, 90.4%, and 85.9% in group S and 89.9%, 86.7%, and 84.8% in group D, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.439). Additionally, patient survival rates were comparable between groups over the 3-year follow-up (log-rank test, p = 0.647).Conclusions This study revealed that the single- and double-purse-string suture catheter insertion methods have similar post-insertion complication and technical survival rates. These data suggest that the single-purse-string suture method can be adopted as standard practice for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e2932bc3bb4f4b2ab0f6f51f56c48307 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 0886-022X 1525-6049 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Renal Failure |
| spelling | doaj-art-e2932bc3bb4f4b2ab0f6f51f56c483072025-08-20T03:05:35ZengTaylor & Francis GroupRenal Failure0886-022X1525-60492024-12-0146210.1080/0886022X.2024.2435209Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string sutureXiaoling Li0Xiuling Chen1Hui Gao2Qin Zhou3Wenshu Liu4Pengli Li5Yan Li6Shiwen Wang7Jin Chen8Guisen Li9Department of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaDepartment of Nephrology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, ChinaObjective Single- and double-purse-string suture methods are both widely used in open surgical catheterization for peritoneal dialysis. This study aimed to compare the post-insertion complications and technical survival of the two methods.Methods This retrospective study matched 142 patients who underwent peritoneal catheterization using the single- (Group S) or double- (Group D) purse-string suture method. Baseline clinical data and complications were recorded, and technical and patient survival rates were evaluated over 3 years.Results There were no significant intergroup differences in terms of infection complication rates (S, 2.8% vs. D, 5.6%, p = 0.377) or non-infection complication rates (2.1% vs. 2.8%, p = 1.000) within the first month post-insertion. The Kaplan–Meier estimates of technical survival at 1, 2, and 3 years were 96.3%, 90.4%, and 85.9% in group S and 89.9%, 86.7%, and 84.8% in group D, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.439). Additionally, patient survival rates were comparable between groups over the 3-year follow-up (log-rank test, p = 0.647).Conclusions This study revealed that the single- and double-purse-string suture catheter insertion methods have similar post-insertion complication and technical survival rates. These data suggest that the single-purse-string suture method can be adopted as standard practice for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2435209Peritoneal dialysiscatheter implantationpurse-string suturecomplicationstechnical survival |
| spellingShingle | Xiaoling Li Xiuling Chen Hui Gao Qin Zhou Wenshu Liu Pengli Li Yan Li Shiwen Wang Jin Chen Guisen Li Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture Renal Failure Peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation purse-string suture complications technical survival |
| title | Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture |
| title_full | Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture |
| title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture |
| title_short | Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion single purse string suture vs double purses string suture |
| topic | Peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation purse-string suture complications technical survival |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2435209 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaolingli comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture AT xiulingchen comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture AT huigao comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture AT qinzhou comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture AT wenshuliu comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture AT penglili comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture AT yanli comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture AT shiwenwang comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture AT jinchen comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture AT guisenli comparativeanalysisofcomplicationsandtechniquesurvivalinperitonealdialysiscatheterinsertionsinglepursestringsuturevsdoublepursesstringsuture |