Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study
Introduction Remote video consultations between clinician and patient are technically possible and increasingly acceptable. They are being introduced in some settings alongside (and occasionally replacing) face-to-face or telephone consultations.Methods To explore the advantages and limitations of v...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016-01-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/1/e009388.full |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1825207061755985920 |
---|---|
author | Trisha Greenhalgh Joe Wherton Sara Shaw Charles Gutteridge Emma Byrne Isabel Hodkinson Shanti Vijayaraghavan Desirée Campbell-Richards Satya Bhattacharya Philippa Hanson Seendy Ramoutar Anna Collard Joanne Morris |
author_facet | Trisha Greenhalgh Joe Wherton Sara Shaw Charles Gutteridge Emma Byrne Isabel Hodkinson Shanti Vijayaraghavan Desirée Campbell-Richards Satya Bhattacharya Philippa Hanson Seendy Ramoutar Anna Collard Joanne Morris |
author_sort | Trisha Greenhalgh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction Remote video consultations between clinician and patient are technically possible and increasingly acceptable. They are being introduced in some settings alongside (and occasionally replacing) face-to-face or telephone consultations.Methods To explore the advantages and limitations of video consultations, we will conduct in-depth qualitative studies of real consultations (microlevel) embedded in an organisational case study (mesolevel), taking account of national context (macrolevel). The study is based in 2 contrasting clinical settings (diabetes and cancer) in a National Health Service (NHS) acute trust in London, UK. Main data sources are: microlevel—audio, video and screen capture to produce rich multimodal data on 45 remote consultations; mesolevel—interviews, ethnographic observations and analysis of documents within the trust; macrolevel—key informant interviews of national-level stakeholders and document analysis. Data will be analysed and synthesised using a sociotechnical framework developed from structuration theory.Ethics approval City Road and Hampstead NHS Research Ethics Committee, 9 December 2014, reference 14/LO/1883.Planned outputs We plan outputs for 5 main audiences: (1) academics: research publications and conference presentations; (2) service providers: standard operating procedures, provisional operational guidance and key safety issues; (3) professional bodies and defence societies: summary of relevant findings to inform guidance to members; (4) policymakers: summary of key findings; (5) patients and carers: ‘what to expect in your virtual consultation’.Discussion The research literature on video consultations is sparse. Such consultations offer potential advantages to patients (who are spared the cost and inconvenience of travel) and the healthcare system (eg, they may be more cost-effective), but fears have been expressed that they may be clinically risky and/or less acceptable to patients or staff, and they bring significant technical, logistical and regulatory challenges. We anticipate that this study will contribute to a balanced assessment of when, how and in what circumstances this model might be introduced. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-e25609523cde4cf982e506c007e905d1 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2044-6055 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | Article |
series | BMJ Open |
spelling | doaj-art-e25609523cde4cf982e506c007e905d12025-02-06T23:55:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552016-01-016110.1136/bmjopen-2015-009388Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) studyTrisha Greenhalgh0Joe Wherton1Sara Shaw2Charles Gutteridge3Emma Byrne4Isabel Hodkinson5Shanti Vijayaraghavan6Desirée Campbell-Richards7Satya Bhattacharya8Philippa Hanson9Seendy Ramoutar10Anna Collard11Joanne Morris12University of Oxford3Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK1Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UKresearch fellow4Tower Hamlets Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UKconsultant diabetologist2Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK2Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK2Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK2Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK2Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK2Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UKIntroduction Remote video consultations between clinician and patient are technically possible and increasingly acceptable. They are being introduced in some settings alongside (and occasionally replacing) face-to-face or telephone consultations.Methods To explore the advantages and limitations of video consultations, we will conduct in-depth qualitative studies of real consultations (microlevel) embedded in an organisational case study (mesolevel), taking account of national context (macrolevel). The study is based in 2 contrasting clinical settings (diabetes and cancer) in a National Health Service (NHS) acute trust in London, UK. Main data sources are: microlevel—audio, video and screen capture to produce rich multimodal data on 45 remote consultations; mesolevel—interviews, ethnographic observations and analysis of documents within the trust; macrolevel—key informant interviews of national-level stakeholders and document analysis. Data will be analysed and synthesised using a sociotechnical framework developed from structuration theory.Ethics approval City Road and Hampstead NHS Research Ethics Committee, 9 December 2014, reference 14/LO/1883.Planned outputs We plan outputs for 5 main audiences: (1) academics: research publications and conference presentations; (2) service providers: standard operating procedures, provisional operational guidance and key safety issues; (3) professional bodies and defence societies: summary of relevant findings to inform guidance to members; (4) policymakers: summary of key findings; (5) patients and carers: ‘what to expect in your virtual consultation’.Discussion The research literature on video consultations is sparse. Such consultations offer potential advantages to patients (who are spared the cost and inconvenience of travel) and the healthcare system (eg, they may be more cost-effective), but fears have been expressed that they may be clinically risky and/or less acceptable to patients or staff, and they bring significant technical, logistical and regulatory challenges. We anticipate that this study will contribute to a balanced assessment of when, how and in what circumstances this model might be introduced.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/1/e009388.full |
spellingShingle | Trisha Greenhalgh Joe Wherton Sara Shaw Charles Gutteridge Emma Byrne Isabel Hodkinson Shanti Vijayaraghavan Desirée Campbell-Richards Satya Bhattacharya Philippa Hanson Seendy Ramoutar Anna Collard Joanne Morris Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study BMJ Open |
title | Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study |
title_full | Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study |
title_fullStr | Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study |
title_full_unstemmed | Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study |
title_short | Virtual online consultations: advantages and limitations (VOCAL) study |
title_sort | virtual online consultations advantages and limitations vocal study |
url | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/1/e009388.full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trishagreenhalgh virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT joewherton virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT sarashaw virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT charlesgutteridge virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT emmabyrne virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT isabelhodkinson virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT shantivijayaraghavan virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT desireecampbellrichards virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT satyabhattacharya virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT philippahanson virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT seendyramoutar virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT annacollard virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy AT joannemorris virtualonlineconsultationsadvantagesandlimitationsvocalstudy |