Une définition territoriale de l’acceptabilité sociale : pièges et défis conceptuels
Embarrassing, the notion of "social acceptability" is gradually gaining credibility both in scientific and social terms. In Quebec, some dynamic researches allow, to some extent, to offer a definition avoiding partially its initial bias to explore some dynamics of the current crisis of the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Éditions en environnement VertigO
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | VertigO |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/16682 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849337860709154816 |
|---|---|
| author | Yann Fournis Marie-José Fortin |
| author_facet | Yann Fournis Marie-José Fortin |
| author_sort | Yann Fournis |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Embarrassing, the notion of "social acceptability" is gradually gaining credibility both in scientific and social terms. In Quebec, some dynamic researches allow, to some extent, to offer a definition avoiding partially its initial bias to explore some dynamics of the current crisis of the model of development based upon natural resources in the Province. In particular, it can highlight the delegitimization of a certain historical type of economic development (which is no longer immediately “acceptable”) and the fierce society debates that this crisis entails during the implementation of some major projects. In this sense, the notion allows to conveniently re-study the relationship between technology and territory, providing that we chose a dynamic (in terms of “acceptability” and not “acceptance”), political (and non-functionalist) and specifically territorial (and not generic or abstract) sense. On this basis, we propose an analytical grid of the processes at work in the collective assessment of a project within a territory, distinguishing three scales (macro-economic, meso-political and micro-social). Linking historical trends of development, struggles of legitimacy and socio-technical controversies and negotiations, this definition intends to take account seriously one of the forgotten factors of economic development: the territories, to examine if they can become actor in their own development. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e2159e53ae59407da4d069a1715caf02 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1492-8442 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
| publisher | Éditions en environnement VertigO |
| record_format | Article |
| series | VertigO |
| spelling | doaj-art-e2159e53ae59407da4d069a1715caf022025-08-20T03:44:33ZfraÉditions en environnement VertigOVertigO1492-84422015-12-0115310.4000/vertigo.16682Une définition territoriale de l’acceptabilité sociale : pièges et défis conceptuelsYann FournisMarie-José FortinEmbarrassing, the notion of "social acceptability" is gradually gaining credibility both in scientific and social terms. In Quebec, some dynamic researches allow, to some extent, to offer a definition avoiding partially its initial bias to explore some dynamics of the current crisis of the model of development based upon natural resources in the Province. In particular, it can highlight the delegitimization of a certain historical type of economic development (which is no longer immediately “acceptable”) and the fierce society debates that this crisis entails during the implementation of some major projects. In this sense, the notion allows to conveniently re-study the relationship between technology and territory, providing that we chose a dynamic (in terms of “acceptability” and not “acceptance”), political (and non-functionalist) and specifically territorial (and not generic or abstract) sense. On this basis, we propose an analytical grid of the processes at work in the collective assessment of a project within a territory, distinguishing three scales (macro-economic, meso-political and micro-social). Linking historical trends of development, struggles of legitimacy and socio-technical controversies and negotiations, this definition intends to take account seriously one of the forgotten factors of economic development: the territories, to examine if they can become actor in their own development.https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/16682natural resourcesterritorywind energysocial acceptabilityextractivismsocio-technical controversies |
| spellingShingle | Yann Fournis Marie-José Fortin Une définition territoriale de l’acceptabilité sociale : pièges et défis conceptuels VertigO natural resources territory wind energy social acceptability extractivism socio-technical controversies |
| title | Une définition territoriale de l’acceptabilité sociale : pièges et défis conceptuels |
| title_full | Une définition territoriale de l’acceptabilité sociale : pièges et défis conceptuels |
| title_fullStr | Une définition territoriale de l’acceptabilité sociale : pièges et défis conceptuels |
| title_full_unstemmed | Une définition territoriale de l’acceptabilité sociale : pièges et défis conceptuels |
| title_short | Une définition territoriale de l’acceptabilité sociale : pièges et défis conceptuels |
| title_sort | une definition territoriale de l acceptabilite sociale pieges et defis conceptuels |
| topic | natural resources territory wind energy social acceptability extractivism socio-technical controversies |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/16682 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yannfournis unedefinitionterritorialedelacceptabilitesocialepiegesetdefisconceptuels AT mariejosefortin unedefinitionterritorialedelacceptabilitesocialepiegesetdefisconceptuels |