Do targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes? Evidence from Kenyan decentralization using the difference-in-differences technique

Abstract Background As envisioned by the 2010 Constitution, Kenya implemented a devolved system of government in March 2013, setting up 47 counties and a corresponding number of local governments. These counties differed in their levels of development. While counties such as Nairobi and Kiambu led i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bishnu Bahadur Thapa, Momotazur Rahman, Lawrence Were, Richard Wamai, Omar Galárraga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:Health Research Policy and Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01272-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850134299567718400
author Bishnu Bahadur Thapa
Momotazur Rahman
Lawrence Were
Richard Wamai
Omar Galárraga
author_facet Bishnu Bahadur Thapa
Momotazur Rahman
Lawrence Were
Richard Wamai
Omar Galárraga
author_sort Bishnu Bahadur Thapa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background As envisioned by the 2010 Constitution, Kenya implemented a devolved system of government in March 2013, setting up 47 counties and a corresponding number of local governments. These counties differed in their levels of development. While counties such as Nairobi and Kiambu led in social and economic indicators, others such as Turkana, Mandera and Wajir were at the bottom of the list. Keeping the between-country disparities and the need to remedy those disparities in mind, the national government used formula-based criteria to determine counties’ eligibility for the receipt of financial resources. On the basis of these criteria, counties were classified into marginalized and nonmarginalized counties. The marginalized counties were the 14 (of the 47) most socially and economically disadvantaged counties. These counties receive additional financial resources, which we call targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers (i.e. fiscal transfers from the national government to county governments). Methods We used the difference-in-differences (DID) technique and fixed effects models to estimate the effects of these targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence and diarrhoea incidence. Results The results revealed that the counties receiving those transfers experienced a statistically significant decline in the incidence of diarrhoea but had no impact on the incidence of HIV. Our study fills a major gap in causal evidence linking intergovernmental fiscal transfers to health outcomes, especially in the context of low–middle-income countries in a newly decentralized setting. Conclusions Our results imply that targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers may be effective at improving some subnational health outcomes, and therefore in reducing within-country health inequalities.
format Article
id doaj-art-e203aa88dae146f7a43df7621f01d39c
institution OA Journals
issn 1478-4505
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Health Research Policy and Systems
spelling doaj-art-e203aa88dae146f7a43df7621f01d39c2025-08-20T02:31:44ZengBMCHealth Research Policy and Systems1478-45052024-12-012211810.1186/s12961-024-01272-xDo targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes? Evidence from Kenyan decentralization using the difference-in-differences techniqueBishnu Bahadur Thapa0Momotazur Rahman1Lawrence Were2Richard Wamai3Omar Galárraga4Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown UniversityDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown UniversityDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Boston UniversityCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities, Northeastern UniversityDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown UniversityAbstract Background As envisioned by the 2010 Constitution, Kenya implemented a devolved system of government in March 2013, setting up 47 counties and a corresponding number of local governments. These counties differed in their levels of development. While counties such as Nairobi and Kiambu led in social and economic indicators, others such as Turkana, Mandera and Wajir were at the bottom of the list. Keeping the between-country disparities and the need to remedy those disparities in mind, the national government used formula-based criteria to determine counties’ eligibility for the receipt of financial resources. On the basis of these criteria, counties were classified into marginalized and nonmarginalized counties. The marginalized counties were the 14 (of the 47) most socially and economically disadvantaged counties. These counties receive additional financial resources, which we call targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers (i.e. fiscal transfers from the national government to county governments). Methods We used the difference-in-differences (DID) technique and fixed effects models to estimate the effects of these targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence and diarrhoea incidence. Results The results revealed that the counties receiving those transfers experienced a statistically significant decline in the incidence of diarrhoea but had no impact on the incidence of HIV. Our study fills a major gap in causal evidence linking intergovernmental fiscal transfers to health outcomes, especially in the context of low–middle-income countries in a newly decentralized setting. Conclusions Our results imply that targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers may be effective at improving some subnational health outcomes, and therefore in reducing within-country health inequalities.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01272-xIntergovernmental fiscal transferDecentralizationDevolutionHealth outcomes
spellingShingle Bishnu Bahadur Thapa
Momotazur Rahman
Lawrence Were
Richard Wamai
Omar Galárraga
Do targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes? Evidence from Kenyan decentralization using the difference-in-differences technique
Health Research Policy and Systems
Intergovernmental fiscal transfer
Decentralization
Devolution
Health outcomes
title Do targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes? Evidence from Kenyan decentralization using the difference-in-differences technique
title_full Do targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes? Evidence from Kenyan decentralization using the difference-in-differences technique
title_fullStr Do targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes? Evidence from Kenyan decentralization using the difference-in-differences technique
title_full_unstemmed Do targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes? Evidence from Kenyan decentralization using the difference-in-differences technique
title_short Do targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes? Evidence from Kenyan decentralization using the difference-in-differences technique
title_sort do targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes evidence from kenyan decentralization using the difference in differences technique
topic Intergovernmental fiscal transfer
Decentralization
Devolution
Health outcomes
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01272-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bishnubahadurthapa dotargetedintergovernmentalfiscaltransfersimprovehealthoutcomesevidencefromkenyandecentralizationusingthedifferenceindifferencestechnique
AT momotazurrahman dotargetedintergovernmentalfiscaltransfersimprovehealthoutcomesevidencefromkenyandecentralizationusingthedifferenceindifferencestechnique
AT lawrencewere dotargetedintergovernmentalfiscaltransfersimprovehealthoutcomesevidencefromkenyandecentralizationusingthedifferenceindifferencestechnique
AT richardwamai dotargetedintergovernmentalfiscaltransfersimprovehealthoutcomesevidencefromkenyandecentralizationusingthedifferenceindifferencestechnique
AT omargalarraga dotargetedintergovernmentalfiscaltransfersimprovehealthoutcomesevidencefromkenyandecentralizationusingthedifferenceindifferencestechnique