ANALYTICAL VALIDATION OF A 10-COLOR FLOW CYTOMETRY PANEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF MEASURABLE RESIDUAL DISEASE OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA

The assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by flow cytometry (FC) is challenging and requires full standardization to provide reliable results for patient management. Here is shown the analytical validation of a 10-color panel for AML MRD detection. Material...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: AR Severino, CM Bertolucci, JFDS Tosi, MRV Ikoma-Colturato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-10-01
Series:Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924006515
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850182565319671808
author AR Severino
CM Bertolucci
JFDS Tosi
MRV Ikoma-Colturato
author_facet AR Severino
CM Bertolucci
JFDS Tosi
MRV Ikoma-Colturato
author_sort AR Severino
collection DOAJ
description The assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by flow cytometry (FC) is challenging and requires full standardization to provide reliable results for patient management. Here is shown the analytical validation of a 10-color panel for AML MRD detection. Material and methods: 6 normal, 50 regenerative and 68MRD positive bone marrow (BM) samples were prepared using bulk lysis for acquisition of at least 1 million cells per tube. The panel composition was addressed to detect leukemia-associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) and different-than-normal (DfN) immunophenotypes (clonal evolution), as well as leukemia stem cell (LSC) identification, using 5 tubes with 6 backbone markers (CD33APC/CD34PECy5.5/CD38APC-H7, CD45V500/CD117PE-Cy7,HLA-DRV450), combined with CD15/CD13/CD11b/CD7, CD2/CD56/CD123, CD97/CD99/CD54/CD244/CD18, CLL1+TIM3 /CD123/CD96/CD19, CD36/CD300e/CD45RA/CD14/CD64 in FITC/PE/AF700/BV421/BV605, respectively. Fluorescent markers were selected according to minimum spillovers between fluorescence channels and their stability after treatment. This panel was validated by comparing with our established 8-color panel. Samples were acquired in BD FACSCanto II and BD FACSLyric 10, adjusted according to EuroFlow's standard operating procedures. An unstained blank tube was run prior to sample acquisition to assess compensation and carry-over contamination was avoided by cleaning with distilled water between tubes. Infinicyt (Cytognos™) software was used for data analysis. Statistical analysis: R software (v 4.1.2) and Excel were used for statistical analysis, considering a p value ≤ 0.05 as significant. Bland-Altman plots and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to assess agreement values between 10- and 8-color panels. Levey-Jennings plots, Ranksum tests, and chi-square tests were used to assess variances on the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the markers in CD34+ progenitor cells in normal and regenerated BM and in blast cells. The chi-square test was also used to compare the expressions of the monoclonal markers at diagnosis and during treatment. The linearity of the tests to determine the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: There was high accuracy and reproducibility comparing the performance of both panels and both flow cytometers (R2 > 0.96). The analytical sensitivity was determined by the limit of blanc (LOB) calculated using normal BM samples not stained with CD34 and CD117, limit of detection (LOD) with LOB+1.645SD; and lower limit of quantification LLOQ, using sequential dilutions of AML samples. Linearity was assessed using the results of blast cell percentages obtained from three samples diluted in duplicate, with high correlation between the measurements (R2 = 0.99; p-value < 0.001). The expression patterns of markers were evaluated according to their MFI in CD34+ progenitor cells from 6 normal and 50 regenerative BM samples compared with the MFI in blast cells from 68 MRD+ samples and there was significance difference of most values (p < 0.05). The hemodilution control was done by the percentages of mast cells (CD117+ bright/HLA-DR-) < 0.002% and of mature granulocytes (CD13 and CD11b bright) > 90%. Conclusion: The results showed a successful process of laboratory validation for AML MRD assessment, as recommended by the international consensuses (ICCS and ELN) and to authorize its use for clinical decision making.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1bd2079048b4dab8c5ae55ea513c333
institution OA Journals
issn 2531-1379
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
spelling doaj-art-e1bd2079048b4dab8c5ae55ea513c3332025-08-20T02:17:36ZengElsevierHematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy2531-13792024-10-0146S19010.1016/j.htct.2024.09.318ANALYTICAL VALIDATION OF A 10-COLOR FLOW CYTOMETRY PANEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF MEASURABLE RESIDUAL DISEASE OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIAAR Severino0CM Bertolucci1JFDS Tosi2MRV Ikoma-Colturato3Hospital Amaral Carvalho (HAC), Jaú, BrazilHospital Amaral Carvalho (HAC), Jaú, BrazilHospital Amaral Carvalho (HAC), Jaú, BrazilHospital Amaral Carvalho (HAC), Jaú, BrazilThe assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by flow cytometry (FC) is challenging and requires full standardization to provide reliable results for patient management. Here is shown the analytical validation of a 10-color panel for AML MRD detection. Material and methods: 6 normal, 50 regenerative and 68MRD positive bone marrow (BM) samples were prepared using bulk lysis for acquisition of at least 1 million cells per tube. The panel composition was addressed to detect leukemia-associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) and different-than-normal (DfN) immunophenotypes (clonal evolution), as well as leukemia stem cell (LSC) identification, using 5 tubes with 6 backbone markers (CD33APC/CD34PECy5.5/CD38APC-H7, CD45V500/CD117PE-Cy7,HLA-DRV450), combined with CD15/CD13/CD11b/CD7, CD2/CD56/CD123, CD97/CD99/CD54/CD244/CD18, CLL1+TIM3 /CD123/CD96/CD19, CD36/CD300e/CD45RA/CD14/CD64 in FITC/PE/AF700/BV421/BV605, respectively. Fluorescent markers were selected according to minimum spillovers between fluorescence channels and their stability after treatment. This panel was validated by comparing with our established 8-color panel. Samples were acquired in BD FACSCanto II and BD FACSLyric 10, adjusted according to EuroFlow's standard operating procedures. An unstained blank tube was run prior to sample acquisition to assess compensation and carry-over contamination was avoided by cleaning with distilled water between tubes. Infinicyt (Cytognos™) software was used for data analysis. Statistical analysis: R software (v 4.1.2) and Excel were used for statistical analysis, considering a p value ≤ 0.05 as significant. Bland-Altman plots and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used to assess agreement values between 10- and 8-color panels. Levey-Jennings plots, Ranksum tests, and chi-square tests were used to assess variances on the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the markers in CD34+ progenitor cells in normal and regenerated BM and in blast cells. The chi-square test was also used to compare the expressions of the monoclonal markers at diagnosis and during treatment. The linearity of the tests to determine the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Results: There was high accuracy and reproducibility comparing the performance of both panels and both flow cytometers (R2 > 0.96). The analytical sensitivity was determined by the limit of blanc (LOB) calculated using normal BM samples not stained with CD34 and CD117, limit of detection (LOD) with LOB+1.645SD; and lower limit of quantification LLOQ, using sequential dilutions of AML samples. Linearity was assessed using the results of blast cell percentages obtained from three samples diluted in duplicate, with high correlation between the measurements (R2 = 0.99; p-value < 0.001). The expression patterns of markers were evaluated according to their MFI in CD34+ progenitor cells from 6 normal and 50 regenerative BM samples compared with the MFI in blast cells from 68 MRD+ samples and there was significance difference of most values (p < 0.05). The hemodilution control was done by the percentages of mast cells (CD117+ bright/HLA-DR-) < 0.002% and of mature granulocytes (CD13 and CD11b bright) > 90%. Conclusion: The results showed a successful process of laboratory validation for AML MRD assessment, as recommended by the international consensuses (ICCS and ELN) and to authorize its use for clinical decision making.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924006515
spellingShingle AR Severino
CM Bertolucci
JFDS Tosi
MRV Ikoma-Colturato
ANALYTICAL VALIDATION OF A 10-COLOR FLOW CYTOMETRY PANEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF MEASURABLE RESIDUAL DISEASE OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy
title ANALYTICAL VALIDATION OF A 10-COLOR FLOW CYTOMETRY PANEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF MEASURABLE RESIDUAL DISEASE OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
title_full ANALYTICAL VALIDATION OF A 10-COLOR FLOW CYTOMETRY PANEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF MEASURABLE RESIDUAL DISEASE OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
title_fullStr ANALYTICAL VALIDATION OF A 10-COLOR FLOW CYTOMETRY PANEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF MEASURABLE RESIDUAL DISEASE OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
title_full_unstemmed ANALYTICAL VALIDATION OF A 10-COLOR FLOW CYTOMETRY PANEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF MEASURABLE RESIDUAL DISEASE OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
title_short ANALYTICAL VALIDATION OF A 10-COLOR FLOW CYTOMETRY PANEL FOR ASSESSMENT OF MEASURABLE RESIDUAL DISEASE OF ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
title_sort analytical validation of a 10 color flow cytometry panel for assessment of measurable residual disease of acute myeloid leukemia
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531137924006515
work_keys_str_mv AT arseverino analyticalvalidationofa10colorflowcytometrypanelforassessmentofmeasurableresidualdiseaseofacutemyeloidleukemia
AT cmbertolucci analyticalvalidationofa10colorflowcytometrypanelforassessmentofmeasurableresidualdiseaseofacutemyeloidleukemia
AT jfdstosi analyticalvalidationofa10colorflowcytometrypanelforassessmentofmeasurableresidualdiseaseofacutemyeloidleukemia
AT mrvikomacolturato analyticalvalidationofa10colorflowcytometrypanelforassessmentofmeasurableresidualdiseaseofacutemyeloidleukemia