The effect of white‐tailed deer browsing on wheat quality and yields in Delaware

Abstract Locally overabundant white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus; hereafter, deer) have caused increased damage to agronomic crops across their range. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) is grown in >60% of the states in the United States where white‐tailed deer occur. Although the effect of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew T. Springer, Jacob L. Bowman, Bruce L. Vasilas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-03-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.242
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850064473156485120
author Matthew T. Springer
Jacob L. Bowman
Bruce L. Vasilas
author_facet Matthew T. Springer
Jacob L. Bowman
Bruce L. Vasilas
author_sort Matthew T. Springer
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Locally overabundant white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus; hereafter, deer) have caused increased damage to agronomic crops across their range. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) is grown in >60% of the states in the United States where white‐tailed deer occur. Although the effect of deer browsing on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) yields has been documented, research on the effect of deer browsing on winter wheat yields and quality is limited. In 2007–2009, we investigated the effect of deer browse timing and wheat type (bearded and unbearded) on yields and quality in Delaware, USA. We randomly stratified 3 treatments (i.e., no protection, protected at planting, or protected prior to heading) in 1,680 plots. After head emergence, we surveyed the plots weekly to estimate browse rates and biomass removed by deer. We harvested a 1‐m2 area in the middle of each plot to determine the deer impact on yield. Browsing increased in intensity as head development progressed and more browsing occurring on the unbearded wheat. Unprotected plots had 195 kg/ha greater wheat yield than did protected plots in 2007 (P = 0.08). We found no difference in wheat yield among treatments during 2008 and 2009 (P = 0.38). Bearded wheat fields had 379 kg/ha greater wheat yield during 2007 and 399 kg/ha greater yield during 2008 and 2009 than did unbearded wheat fields (P < 0.001). We also observed no difference in wheat quality among treatments or between types of wheat (P > 0.417). Our browse surveys suggested avoidance of bearded wheat but the overall browsing was not intense enough to affect yield. Our results demonstrated that white‐tailed deer had no impact on wheat yield at a deer density of 15 deer/km2. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1a8dae76b6a4b74b25764866a4c9262
institution DOAJ
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-e1a8dae76b6a4b74b25764866a4c92622025-08-20T02:49:17ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402013-03-0137115516110.1002/wsb.242The effect of white‐tailed deer browsing on wheat quality and yields in DelawareMatthew T. Springer0Jacob L. Bowman1Bruce L. Vasilas2Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 S. College Avenue, Newark, DE 19717, USADepartment of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 S. College Avenue, Newark, DE 19717, USADepartment of Plant and Soils Sciences, University of Delaware, 531 S. College Avenue, Newark, DE 19717, USAAbstract Locally overabundant white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus; hereafter, deer) have caused increased damage to agronomic crops across their range. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) is grown in >60% of the states in the United States where white‐tailed deer occur. Although the effect of deer browsing on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) yields has been documented, research on the effect of deer browsing on winter wheat yields and quality is limited. In 2007–2009, we investigated the effect of deer browse timing and wheat type (bearded and unbearded) on yields and quality in Delaware, USA. We randomly stratified 3 treatments (i.e., no protection, protected at planting, or protected prior to heading) in 1,680 plots. After head emergence, we surveyed the plots weekly to estimate browse rates and biomass removed by deer. We harvested a 1‐m2 area in the middle of each plot to determine the deer impact on yield. Browsing increased in intensity as head development progressed and more browsing occurring on the unbearded wheat. Unprotected plots had 195 kg/ha greater wheat yield than did protected plots in 2007 (P = 0.08). We found no difference in wheat yield among treatments during 2008 and 2009 (P = 0.38). Bearded wheat fields had 379 kg/ha greater wheat yield during 2007 and 399 kg/ha greater yield during 2008 and 2009 than did unbearded wheat fields (P < 0.001). We also observed no difference in wheat quality among treatments or between types of wheat (P > 0.417). Our browse surveys suggested avoidance of bearded wheat but the overall browsing was not intense enough to affect yield. Our results demonstrated that white‐tailed deer had no impact on wheat yield at a deer density of 15 deer/km2. © 2013 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.242crop damageDelawareOdocoileus virginianusTriticum aestivumwheat qualitywheat yield
spellingShingle Matthew T. Springer
Jacob L. Bowman
Bruce L. Vasilas
The effect of white‐tailed deer browsing on wheat quality and yields in Delaware
Wildlife Society Bulletin
crop damage
Delaware
Odocoileus virginianus
Triticum aestivum
wheat quality
wheat yield
title The effect of white‐tailed deer browsing on wheat quality and yields in Delaware
title_full The effect of white‐tailed deer browsing on wheat quality and yields in Delaware
title_fullStr The effect of white‐tailed deer browsing on wheat quality and yields in Delaware
title_full_unstemmed The effect of white‐tailed deer browsing on wheat quality and yields in Delaware
title_short The effect of white‐tailed deer browsing on wheat quality and yields in Delaware
title_sort effect of white tailed deer browsing on wheat quality and yields in delaware
topic crop damage
Delaware
Odocoileus virginianus
Triticum aestivum
wheat quality
wheat yield
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.242
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewtspringer theeffectofwhitetaileddeerbrowsingonwheatqualityandyieldsindelaware
AT jacoblbowman theeffectofwhitetaileddeerbrowsingonwheatqualityandyieldsindelaware
AT brucelvasilas theeffectofwhitetaileddeerbrowsingonwheatqualityandyieldsindelaware
AT matthewtspringer effectofwhitetaileddeerbrowsingonwheatqualityandyieldsindelaware
AT jacoblbowman effectofwhitetaileddeerbrowsingonwheatqualityandyieldsindelaware
AT brucelvasilas effectofwhitetaileddeerbrowsingonwheatqualityandyieldsindelaware