The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation

Objective: The ideal alternative for tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of using bioprosthetic and mechanical valves at the tricuspid position. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weitao Liang, Honghua Yue, Tao Li, Xiaoli Qin, Yongjun Qian, Zhong Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KARE Publishing 2019-09-01
Series:Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=anatoljcardiol&un=AJC-47381
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850229048107597824
author Weitao Liang
Honghua Yue
Tao Li
Xiaoli Qin
Yongjun Qian
Zhong Wu
author_facet Weitao Liang
Honghua Yue
Tao Li
Xiaoli Qin
Yongjun Qian
Zhong Wu
author_sort Weitao Liang
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The ideal alternative for tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of using bioprosthetic and mechanical valves at the tricuspid position. Methods: A total of 98 consecutive patients without left-side cardiac disease or history of heart surgery who underwent first-time TVR between January 2010 and March 2017 at the West China Hospital, China were included in the study. Patient data, including all-cause death and need for tricuspid valve reoperation as the main end points, were retrospectively evaluated. Results: A total of 76 patients were enrolled into the study. The mean follow-up period was 43.3+-21.9 (10–87) months. The mean age of the patients was 45.7+-13.4 years. The study comprised 32.9% of male patients. During the follow-up period, 4, 3, 12, and 3 cases of death, reoperation, prosthesis dysfunctions, and prosthesis-related thrombosis were noted, respectively. Biological and mechanical valves were used in 56.6% and 43.4% of the patients, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between mechanical and biological valves with respect to echocardiographic date and survival, reoperation, prosthetic valve dysfunction, and thromboembolism rate. Conclusion: TVR is not a very high-risk procedure in patients with isolated tricuspid regurgitation, and the decision for prosthesis implantation in TVR should be made on an individual basis according to suitable clinical judgment.
format Article
id doaj-art-e19592c34ce14019bf0c53d4227f01f5
institution OA Journals
issn 2149-2263
language English
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher KARE Publishing
record_format Article
series Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-e19592c34ce14019bf0c53d4227f01f52025-08-20T02:04:21ZengKARE PublishingAnatolian Journal of Cardiology2149-22632019-09-0122417217610.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.47381AJC-47381The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitationWeitao Liang0Honghua Yue1Tao Li2Xiaoli Qin3Yongjun Qian4Zhong Wu5Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University; Sichuan-ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University; Sichuan-ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University; Sichuan-ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University; Sichuan-ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University; Sichuan-ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University; Sichuan-ChinaObjective: The ideal alternative for tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of using bioprosthetic and mechanical valves at the tricuspid position. Methods: A total of 98 consecutive patients without left-side cardiac disease or history of heart surgery who underwent first-time TVR between January 2010 and March 2017 at the West China Hospital, China were included in the study. Patient data, including all-cause death and need for tricuspid valve reoperation as the main end points, were retrospectively evaluated. Results: A total of 76 patients were enrolled into the study. The mean follow-up period was 43.3+-21.9 (10–87) months. The mean age of the patients was 45.7+-13.4 years. The study comprised 32.9% of male patients. During the follow-up period, 4, 3, 12, and 3 cases of death, reoperation, prosthesis dysfunctions, and prosthesis-related thrombosis were noted, respectively. Biological and mechanical valves were used in 56.6% and 43.4% of the patients, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between mechanical and biological valves with respect to echocardiographic date and survival, reoperation, prosthetic valve dysfunction, and thromboembolism rate. Conclusion: TVR is not a very high-risk procedure in patients with isolated tricuspid regurgitation, and the decision for prosthesis implantation in TVR should be made on an individual basis according to suitable clinical judgment.https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=anatoljcardiol&un=AJC-47381tricuspid valve replacementmechanical valvebiological valve.
spellingShingle Weitao Liang
Honghua Yue
Tao Li
Xiaoli Qin
Yongjun Qian
Zhong Wu
The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
tricuspid valve replacement
mechanical valve
biological valve.
title The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation
title_full The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation
title_fullStr The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation
title_full_unstemmed The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation
title_short The better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation
title_sort better substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with severe isolated tricuspid regurgitation
topic tricuspid valve replacement
mechanical valve
biological valve.
url https://jag.journalagent.com/z4/download_fulltext.asp?pdir=anatoljcardiol&un=AJC-47381
work_keys_str_mv AT weitaoliang thebettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT honghuayue thebettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT taoli thebettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT xiaoliqin thebettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT yongjunqian thebettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT zhongwu thebettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT weitaoliang bettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT honghuayue bettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT taoli bettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT xiaoliqin bettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT yongjunqian bettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation
AT zhongwu bettersubstitutefortricuspidvalvereplacementinpatientswithsevereisolatedtricuspidregurgitation