A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England

Objective. The aim of this research was to explore the influence of service organisation and delivery on providers and users’ interactions and decision-making in the context of Down’s syndrome screening. Methods. A qualitative descriptive study involving online interviews conducted with a purposive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyacinth O. Ukuhor, Janet Hirst, S. José Closs, William J. Montelpare
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Pregnancy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4975091
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849691627528912896
author Hyacinth O. Ukuhor
Janet Hirst
S. José Closs
William J. Montelpare
author_facet Hyacinth O. Ukuhor
Janet Hirst
S. José Closs
William J. Montelpare
author_sort Hyacinth O. Ukuhor
collection DOAJ
description Objective. The aim of this research was to explore the influence of service organisation and delivery on providers and users’ interactions and decision-making in the context of Down’s syndrome screening. Methods. A qualitative descriptive study involving online interviews conducted with a purposive sample of 34 community midwives, 35 pregnant women, and 15 partners from two maternity services in different health districts in England. Data were analysed using a combination of grounded theory principles and content analysis and a framework was developed. Results. The main emerging concepts were organisational constraints, power, routinisation, and tensions. Providers were concerned about being time-limited that encouraged routine, minimal information-giving and lacked skills to check users’ understanding. Users reported their participation was influenced by providers’ attitudes, the ambience of the environment, asymmetric power relations, and the offer and perception of screening as a routine test. Discordance between the national programme’s policy of nondirective informed choice and providers’ actions of recommending and arranging screening appointments was unexpected. Additionally, providers and users differing perceptions of emotional effects of information, beliefs, and expectations created tensions within them, between them, and in the antenatal environment. Conclusions. A move towards a social model of care may be beneficial to empower service users and create less tension for providers and users.
format Article
id doaj-art-e18e88c47f794b6d86378e6df52308af
institution DOAJ
issn 2090-2727
2090-2735
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Pregnancy
spelling doaj-art-e18e88c47f794b6d86378e6df52308af2025-08-20T03:20:58ZengWileyJournal of Pregnancy2090-27272090-27352017-01-01201710.1155/2017/49750914975091A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in EnglandHyacinth O. Ukuhor0Janet Hirst1S. José Closs2William J. Montelpare3Department of Public Health, Saudi Electronic University, P.O. Box 93499, Riyadh 11673, Saudi ArabiaSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Baines Wing, Room 3.10, Leeds LS2 9JT, UKSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, 2.25 Baines Wing, Leeds LS2 9UT, UKMargaret and Wallace McCain Chair in Human Development and Health, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 4P3, CanadaObjective. The aim of this research was to explore the influence of service organisation and delivery on providers and users’ interactions and decision-making in the context of Down’s syndrome screening. Methods. A qualitative descriptive study involving online interviews conducted with a purposive sample of 34 community midwives, 35 pregnant women, and 15 partners from two maternity services in different health districts in England. Data were analysed using a combination of grounded theory principles and content analysis and a framework was developed. Results. The main emerging concepts were organisational constraints, power, routinisation, and tensions. Providers were concerned about being time-limited that encouraged routine, minimal information-giving and lacked skills to check users’ understanding. Users reported their participation was influenced by providers’ attitudes, the ambience of the environment, asymmetric power relations, and the offer and perception of screening as a routine test. Discordance between the national programme’s policy of nondirective informed choice and providers’ actions of recommending and arranging screening appointments was unexpected. Additionally, providers and users differing perceptions of emotional effects of information, beliefs, and expectations created tensions within them, between them, and in the antenatal environment. Conclusions. A move towards a social model of care may be beneficial to empower service users and create less tension for providers and users.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4975091
spellingShingle Hyacinth O. Ukuhor
Janet Hirst
S. José Closs
William J. Montelpare
A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England
Journal of Pregnancy
title A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England
title_full A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England
title_fullStr A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England
title_full_unstemmed A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England
title_short A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England
title_sort framework for describing the influence of service organisation and delivery on participation in fetal anomaly screening in england
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4975091
work_keys_str_mv AT hyacinthoukuhor aframeworkfordescribingtheinfluenceofserviceorganisationanddeliveryonparticipationinfetalanomalyscreeninginengland
AT janethirst aframeworkfordescribingtheinfluenceofserviceorganisationanddeliveryonparticipationinfetalanomalyscreeninginengland
AT sjosecloss aframeworkfordescribingtheinfluenceofserviceorganisationanddeliveryonparticipationinfetalanomalyscreeninginengland
AT williamjmontelpare aframeworkfordescribingtheinfluenceofserviceorganisationanddeliveryonparticipationinfetalanomalyscreeninginengland
AT hyacinthoukuhor frameworkfordescribingtheinfluenceofserviceorganisationanddeliveryonparticipationinfetalanomalyscreeninginengland
AT janethirst frameworkfordescribingtheinfluenceofserviceorganisationanddeliveryonparticipationinfetalanomalyscreeninginengland
AT sjosecloss frameworkfordescribingtheinfluenceofserviceorganisationanddeliveryonparticipationinfetalanomalyscreeninginengland
AT williamjmontelpare frameworkfordescribingtheinfluenceofserviceorganisationanddeliveryonparticipationinfetalanomalyscreeninginengland