Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas comprise a heterogenous group of disorders which differ in biology. Although response rates are high in some groups, relapsed disease can be difficult to treat, and newer approaches are needed for this patient population. It is increasingly apparent that the immune system plays...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maansi Joshi, Stephen M. Ansell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Immunology Research
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8820377
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560353843609600
author Maansi Joshi
Stephen M. Ansell
author_facet Maansi Joshi
Stephen M. Ansell
author_sort Maansi Joshi
collection DOAJ
description Non-Hodgkin lymphomas comprise a heterogenous group of disorders which differ in biology. Although response rates are high in some groups, relapsed disease can be difficult to treat, and newer approaches are needed for this patient population. It is increasingly apparent that the immune system plays a significant role in the propagation and survival of malignant cells. Immune checkpoint blocking agents augment cytotoxic activity of the adaptive and innate immune systems and enhance tumor cell killing. Anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies have been tested as both single agents and combination therapy. Although success rates with anti-PD-1 antibodies are high in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, the results are yet to be replicated in those with non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Some lymphoma histologies, such as primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBL), central nervous system, and testicular lymphomas and gray zone lymphoma, respond favorably to PD-1 blockade, but the response rates in most lymphoma subtypes are low. Other agents including those targeting the adaptive immune system such as TIM-3, TIGIT, and BTLA and innate immune system such as CD47 and KIR are therefore in trials to test alternative ways to activate the immune system. Patient selection based on tumor biology is likely to be a determining factor in treatment response in patients, and further research exploring optimal patient populations, newer targets, and combination therapy as well as identifying biomarkers is needed.
format Article
id doaj-art-e17fac6053d0446793a320c83cba255c
institution Kabale University
issn 2314-8861
2314-7156
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Immunology Research
spelling doaj-art-e17fac6053d0446793a320c83cba255c2025-02-03T01:27:56ZengWileyJournal of Immunology Research2314-88612314-71562020-01-01202010.1155/2020/88203778820377Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaansi Joshi0Stephen M. Ansell1Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USADivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USANon-Hodgkin lymphomas comprise a heterogenous group of disorders which differ in biology. Although response rates are high in some groups, relapsed disease can be difficult to treat, and newer approaches are needed for this patient population. It is increasingly apparent that the immune system plays a significant role in the propagation and survival of malignant cells. Immune checkpoint blocking agents augment cytotoxic activity of the adaptive and innate immune systems and enhance tumor cell killing. Anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies have been tested as both single agents and combination therapy. Although success rates with anti-PD-1 antibodies are high in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma, the results are yet to be replicated in those with non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Some lymphoma histologies, such as primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBL), central nervous system, and testicular lymphomas and gray zone lymphoma, respond favorably to PD-1 blockade, but the response rates in most lymphoma subtypes are low. Other agents including those targeting the adaptive immune system such as TIM-3, TIGIT, and BTLA and innate immune system such as CD47 and KIR are therefore in trials to test alternative ways to activate the immune system. Patient selection based on tumor biology is likely to be a determining factor in treatment response in patients, and further research exploring optimal patient populations, newer targets, and combination therapy as well as identifying biomarkers is needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8820377
spellingShingle Maansi Joshi
Stephen M. Ansell
Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Journal of Immunology Research
title Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
title_full Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
title_fullStr Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
title_short Activating the Antitumor Immune Response in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Using Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
title_sort activating the antitumor immune response in non hodgkin lymphoma using immune checkpoint inhibitors
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8820377
work_keys_str_mv AT maansijoshi activatingtheantitumorimmuneresponseinnonhodgkinlymphomausingimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT stephenmansell activatingtheantitumorimmuneresponseinnonhodgkinlymphomausingimmunecheckpointinhibitors