InSAR observations reveal interactions between seismic and aseismic slip during and after the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake

Abstract Studying the relationship between coseismic slip and aseismic creep helps better understand the seismic and aseismic behavior of crustal faults. We use multi-platform synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and global positioning system data to invert for the coseismic fault slip of the 2016 Mw 6.6...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia Xu, Zhiyu Gao, Jie Liu, Wei Yan, Haipeng Guo, Rui Liu, Changrong Yi, Dongxin Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-04-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98880-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850206505679192064
author Jia Xu
Zhiyu Gao
Jie Liu
Wei Yan
Haipeng Guo
Rui Liu
Changrong Yi
Dongxin Xu
author_facet Jia Xu
Zhiyu Gao
Jie Liu
Wei Yan
Haipeng Guo
Rui Liu
Changrong Yi
Dongxin Xu
author_sort Jia Xu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Studying the relationship between coseismic slip and aseismic creep helps better understand the seismic and aseismic behavior of crustal faults. We use multi-platform synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and global positioning system data to invert for the coseismic fault slip of the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake in western China. Our results indicate that the earthquake ruptured two asperities, which were separated by a ~ 10-km-long slip gap. InSAR observations (2014–2016) before the earthquake show two aseismic creeping sections along the Muji fault. The western creeping section overlapped with the coseismic slip gap, and the eastern creeping section marked the eastern termination of the earthquake rupture. The spatial coincidence of creep with coseismic slip gap suggests aseismic slip might arrest and act as a barrier to seismic rupture propagation. Moreover, we observe that the creep rate along the western creeping section was similar before and after (2017–2020) the earthquake, while it accelerated along the eastern creeping section after the earthquake. Creep rate acceleration along the eastern creeping section is likely to be promoted by positive Coulomb stress changes. InSAR time-series data show that the promotion has lasted several years and is perhaps long lasting, highlighting a need to reassess the aseismic slip behavior and seismic potential along creeping faults with large historical earthquakes.
format Article
id doaj-art-e16dd049eb8248aa86fe4ed7638f7644
institution OA Journals
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-e16dd049eb8248aa86fe4ed7638f76442025-08-20T02:10:49ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-04-0115111210.1038/s41598-025-98880-6InSAR observations reveal interactions between seismic and aseismic slip during and after the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquakeJia Xu0Zhiyu Gao1Jie Liu2Wei Yan3Haipeng Guo4Rui Liu5Changrong Yi6Dongxin Xu7Hebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research StationState Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics, Institute of Geology, China Earthquake AdministrationHebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research StationHebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research StationHebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research StationHebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research StationHebei Cangzhou Groundwater and Land Subsidence National Observation and Research StationChina South-to-North Water Diversion Corporation Limited Tianjin BranchAbstract Studying the relationship between coseismic slip and aseismic creep helps better understand the seismic and aseismic behavior of crustal faults. We use multi-platform synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and global positioning system data to invert for the coseismic fault slip of the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake in western China. Our results indicate that the earthquake ruptured two asperities, which were separated by a ~ 10-km-long slip gap. InSAR observations (2014–2016) before the earthquake show two aseismic creeping sections along the Muji fault. The western creeping section overlapped with the coseismic slip gap, and the eastern creeping section marked the eastern termination of the earthquake rupture. The spatial coincidence of creep with coseismic slip gap suggests aseismic slip might arrest and act as a barrier to seismic rupture propagation. Moreover, we observe that the creep rate along the western creeping section was similar before and after (2017–2020) the earthquake, while it accelerated along the eastern creeping section after the earthquake. Creep rate acceleration along the eastern creeping section is likely to be promoted by positive Coulomb stress changes. InSAR time-series data show that the promotion has lasted several years and is perhaps long lasting, highlighting a need to reassess the aseismic slip behavior and seismic potential along creeping faults with large historical earthquakes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98880-6InSARSeismic slipAseismic slip2016 Muji earthquake
spellingShingle Jia Xu
Zhiyu Gao
Jie Liu
Wei Yan
Haipeng Guo
Rui Liu
Changrong Yi
Dongxin Xu
InSAR observations reveal interactions between seismic and aseismic slip during and after the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake
Scientific Reports
InSAR
Seismic slip
Aseismic slip
2016 Muji earthquake
title InSAR observations reveal interactions between seismic and aseismic slip during and after the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake
title_full InSAR observations reveal interactions between seismic and aseismic slip during and after the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake
title_fullStr InSAR observations reveal interactions between seismic and aseismic slip during and after the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake
title_full_unstemmed InSAR observations reveal interactions between seismic and aseismic slip during and after the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake
title_short InSAR observations reveal interactions between seismic and aseismic slip during and after the 2016 Mw 6.6 Muji earthquake
title_sort insar observations reveal interactions between seismic and aseismic slip during and after the 2016 mw 6 6 muji earthquake
topic InSAR
Seismic slip
Aseismic slip
2016 Muji earthquake
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98880-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaxu insarobservationsrevealinteractionsbetweenseismicandaseismicslipduringandafterthe2016mw66mujiearthquake
AT zhiyugao insarobservationsrevealinteractionsbetweenseismicandaseismicslipduringandafterthe2016mw66mujiearthquake
AT jieliu insarobservationsrevealinteractionsbetweenseismicandaseismicslipduringandafterthe2016mw66mujiearthquake
AT weiyan insarobservationsrevealinteractionsbetweenseismicandaseismicslipduringandafterthe2016mw66mujiearthquake
AT haipengguo insarobservationsrevealinteractionsbetweenseismicandaseismicslipduringandafterthe2016mw66mujiearthquake
AT ruiliu insarobservationsrevealinteractionsbetweenseismicandaseismicslipduringandafterthe2016mw66mujiearthquake
AT changrongyi insarobservationsrevealinteractionsbetweenseismicandaseismicslipduringandafterthe2016mw66mujiearthquake
AT dongxinxu insarobservationsrevealinteractionsbetweenseismicandaseismicslipduringandafterthe2016mw66mujiearthquake