Deterring hooded crows from re‐nesting on power poles

Abstract Hooded crows (Corvus cornix) nest on power poles throughout the north of Scotland, and the interruptions to electricity supply caused by the nests cost the electricity provider in excess of (UK) £250,000 annually. In the Orkney Isles, where pole nesting is relatively common, most nests are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guillam E. McIvor, Candy Rowe, Susan D. Healy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-12-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.211
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850116093575692288
author Guillam E. McIvor
Candy Rowe
Susan D. Healy
author_facet Guillam E. McIvor
Candy Rowe
Susan D. Healy
author_sort Guillam E. McIvor
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Hooded crows (Corvus cornix) nest on power poles throughout the north of Scotland, and the interruptions to electricity supply caused by the nests cost the electricity provider in excess of (UK) £250,000 annually. In the Orkney Isles, where pole nesting is relatively common, most nests are actively removed before they can cause a fault. However, rebuilding often occurs. Although the electrical company routinely fits Firefly FF‐type diverters (P & R Tech Inc., Beaverton, OR, USA) after nest removals to deter the crows from rebuilding, there has been no field test of the effectiveness of the Fireflies as a deterrent. In our study, carried out in Orkney in the Spring/Summer of 2009 and 2010, Fireflies were fitted at half of the sites from which nests were removed and not fitted at the other half of the sites. We found that crows were equally likely to rebuild at sites fitted with Fireflies as they were to rebuild at sites without Fireflies. However, rebuilding was less likely to occur the later in the season that nests were removed, and nests in the middle phase of construction were the most likely to be rebuilt. Therefore, making an appropriate decision as to when to remove a crow nest seems to be a more effective method for deterring nest rebuilding than is the fitting of Firefly diverters. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-e14360b9533d417fb0c0f12b1c079221
institution OA Journals
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2012-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-e14360b9533d417fb0c0f12b1c0792212025-08-20T02:36:23ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402012-12-0136472973410.1002/wsb.211Deterring hooded crows from re‐nesting on power polesGuillam E. McIvor0Candy Rowe1Susan D. Healy2School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UKCentre for Behaviour and Evolution, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Henry Wellcome Building, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UKSchools of Psychology and Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UKAbstract Hooded crows (Corvus cornix) nest on power poles throughout the north of Scotland, and the interruptions to electricity supply caused by the nests cost the electricity provider in excess of (UK) £250,000 annually. In the Orkney Isles, where pole nesting is relatively common, most nests are actively removed before they can cause a fault. However, rebuilding often occurs. Although the electrical company routinely fits Firefly FF‐type diverters (P & R Tech Inc., Beaverton, OR, USA) after nest removals to deter the crows from rebuilding, there has been no field test of the effectiveness of the Fireflies as a deterrent. In our study, carried out in Orkney in the Spring/Summer of 2009 and 2010, Fireflies were fitted at half of the sites from which nests were removed and not fitted at the other half of the sites. We found that crows were equally likely to rebuild at sites fitted with Fireflies as they were to rebuild at sites without Fireflies. However, rebuilding was less likely to occur the later in the season that nests were removed, and nests in the middle phase of construction were the most likely to be rebuilt. Therefore, making an appropriate decision as to when to remove a crow nest seems to be a more effective method for deterring nest rebuilding than is the fitting of Firefly diverters. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.211Corvus cornixdeterrentselectricityFirefly diverterhooded crownesting
spellingShingle Guillam E. McIvor
Candy Rowe
Susan D. Healy
Deterring hooded crows from re‐nesting on power poles
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Corvus cornix
deterrents
electricity
Firefly diverter
hooded crow
nesting
title Deterring hooded crows from re‐nesting on power poles
title_full Deterring hooded crows from re‐nesting on power poles
title_fullStr Deterring hooded crows from re‐nesting on power poles
title_full_unstemmed Deterring hooded crows from re‐nesting on power poles
title_short Deterring hooded crows from re‐nesting on power poles
title_sort deterring hooded crows from re nesting on power poles
topic Corvus cornix
deterrents
electricity
Firefly diverter
hooded crow
nesting
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.211
work_keys_str_mv AT guillamemcivor deterringhoodedcrowsfromrenestingonpowerpoles
AT candyrowe deterringhoodedcrowsfromrenestingonpowerpoles
AT susandhealy deterringhoodedcrowsfromrenestingonpowerpoles