Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study

OBJECTIVES:. To investigate the effect of canine-assisted intervention (CAI) on anxiety symptoms among intensive care patients and their family members. DESIGN:. Prospective, single-center, single-arm, nonrandomized, within-subject study design. SETTING:. Tertiary hospital ICU. PATIENTS/SUBJECTS:. A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathleen Cook, DipCritCare, Clare Robertson, DipCritCare, Kiran Gudivada, DM, Imogen Mitchell, PhD, Mary Nourse, GradCertIntCareN, Megan M. Hosey, PhD, Catherine Paterson, PhD, Sumeet Rai, FCICM
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2025-05-01
Series:Critical Care Explorations
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001258
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849325616459939840
author Kathleen Cook, DipCritCare
Clare Robertson, DipCritCare
Kiran Gudivada, DM
Imogen Mitchell, PhD
Mary Nourse, GradCertIntCareN
Megan M. Hosey, PhD
Catherine Paterson, PhD
Sumeet Rai, FCICM
author_facet Kathleen Cook, DipCritCare
Clare Robertson, DipCritCare
Kiran Gudivada, DM
Imogen Mitchell, PhD
Mary Nourse, GradCertIntCareN
Megan M. Hosey, PhD
Catherine Paterson, PhD
Sumeet Rai, FCICM
author_sort Kathleen Cook, DipCritCare
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES:. To investigate the effect of canine-assisted intervention (CAI) on anxiety symptoms among intensive care patients and their family members. DESIGN:. Prospective, single-center, single-arm, nonrandomized, within-subject study design. SETTING:. Tertiary hospital ICU. PATIENTS/SUBJECTS:. Adult (≥ 16 yr) ICU patients and their family members. INTERVENTIONS:. Individual CAI (therapy dog) sessions, lasting at least 15 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:. Primary outcome: change in Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A) among patients and family members; secondary outcomes (patient cohort): change in: 1) Numeric Pain Rating Scale, 2) physiologic vital signs, and 3) intervention-related adverse events. A total of 141 participants (70 patients and 71 family members) were recruited. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age (yr) was 63 (49–71) for patients, and 51 (36–61) for family members. There was a significant reduction in anxiety scores after the intervention, with median (IQR) VAS-A scores changing from 5 (1–7) to 0 (0–4 [p < 0.001]) for the patient cohort and from 6 (5–8) to 3 (1–5 [p < 0.001]) for the family cohort. Majority of patients (56/70 [62%]) and family members (63/68 [93%]) demonstrated a greater than or equal to 2-point reduction in VAS-A scores. In terms of pain, median (IQR) scores among the patient cohort were also lower post-intervention (0 [0–5] vs. 0 [0–2]; p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant changes in physiologic vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure) among patients following the intervention. Additionally, there were no reported dog bites, scratches, or other adverse events during CAI. CONCLUSIONS:. CAI offers immediate therapeutic benefits in reducing anxiety symptoms in ICU patients and their family members with no observed adverse effects. It may also have a potential role as an adjunctive therapy for pain management in ICU patients. Further research should explore the influence on longer-term psychologic outcomes for ICU patients and family members.
format Article
id doaj-art-e141292f15e549bfb2d70d1eb2e24784
institution Kabale University
issn 2639-8028
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format Article
series Critical Care Explorations
spelling doaj-art-e141292f15e549bfb2d70d1eb2e247842025-08-20T03:48:22ZengWolters KluwerCritical Care Explorations2639-80282025-05-0175e125810.1097/CCE.0000000000001258202505000-00002Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm StudyKathleen Cook, DipCritCare0Clare Robertson, DipCritCare1Kiran Gudivada, DM2Imogen Mitchell, PhD3Mary Nourse, GradCertIntCareN4Megan M. Hosey, PhD5Catherine Paterson, PhD6Sumeet Rai, FCICM71 Advance Practice Nurse, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, ACT, Australia.2 Registered Nurse, Canberra Hospital, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, ACT, Australia.3 School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.3 School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.4 Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra Health Services, Canberra, ACT, Australia.5 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.6 Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.3 School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.OBJECTIVES:. To investigate the effect of canine-assisted intervention (CAI) on anxiety symptoms among intensive care patients and their family members. DESIGN:. Prospective, single-center, single-arm, nonrandomized, within-subject study design. SETTING:. Tertiary hospital ICU. PATIENTS/SUBJECTS:. Adult (≥ 16 yr) ICU patients and their family members. INTERVENTIONS:. Individual CAI (therapy dog) sessions, lasting at least 15 minutes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:. Primary outcome: change in Visual Analog Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A) among patients and family members; secondary outcomes (patient cohort): change in: 1) Numeric Pain Rating Scale, 2) physiologic vital signs, and 3) intervention-related adverse events. A total of 141 participants (70 patients and 71 family members) were recruited. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age (yr) was 63 (49–71) for patients, and 51 (36–61) for family members. There was a significant reduction in anxiety scores after the intervention, with median (IQR) VAS-A scores changing from 5 (1–7) to 0 (0–4 [p < 0.001]) for the patient cohort and from 6 (5–8) to 3 (1–5 [p < 0.001]) for the family cohort. Majority of patients (56/70 [62%]) and family members (63/68 [93%]) demonstrated a greater than or equal to 2-point reduction in VAS-A scores. In terms of pain, median (IQR) scores among the patient cohort were also lower post-intervention (0 [0–5] vs. 0 [0–2]; p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant changes in physiologic vital signs (heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure) among patients following the intervention. Additionally, there were no reported dog bites, scratches, or other adverse events during CAI. CONCLUSIONS:. CAI offers immediate therapeutic benefits in reducing anxiety symptoms in ICU patients and their family members with no observed adverse effects. It may also have a potential role as an adjunctive therapy for pain management in ICU patients. Further research should explore the influence on longer-term psychologic outcomes for ICU patients and family members.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001258
spellingShingle Kathleen Cook, DipCritCare
Clare Robertson, DipCritCare
Kiran Gudivada, DM
Imogen Mitchell, PhD
Mary Nourse, GradCertIntCareN
Megan M. Hosey, PhD
Catherine Paterson, PhD
Sumeet Rai, FCICM
Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study
Critical Care Explorations
title Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study
title_full Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study
title_fullStr Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study
title_full_unstemmed Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study
title_short Pawsitive Care: Canine-Assisted Intervention for Anxiety in ICU Patients and Family Members: A Single-Center, Single-Arm Study
title_sort pawsitive care canine assisted intervention for anxiety in icu patients and family members a single center single arm study
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001258
work_keys_str_mv AT kathleencookdipcritcare pawsitivecarecanineassistedinterventionforanxietyinicupatientsandfamilymembersasinglecentersinglearmstudy
AT clarerobertsondipcritcare pawsitivecarecanineassistedinterventionforanxietyinicupatientsandfamilymembersasinglecentersinglearmstudy
AT kirangudivadadm pawsitivecarecanineassistedinterventionforanxietyinicupatientsandfamilymembersasinglecentersinglearmstudy
AT imogenmitchellphd pawsitivecarecanineassistedinterventionforanxietyinicupatientsandfamilymembersasinglecentersinglearmstudy
AT marynoursegradcertintcaren pawsitivecarecanineassistedinterventionforanxietyinicupatientsandfamilymembersasinglecentersinglearmstudy
AT meganmhoseyphd pawsitivecarecanineassistedinterventionforanxietyinicupatientsandfamilymembersasinglecentersinglearmstudy
AT catherinepatersonphd pawsitivecarecanineassistedinterventionforanxietyinicupatientsandfamilymembersasinglecentersinglearmstudy
AT sumeetraifcicm pawsitivecarecanineassistedinterventionforanxietyinicupatientsandfamilymembersasinglecentersinglearmstudy