Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping review
Background The study aimed to synthesize participant retention-related data for longitudinal follow-up studies of survivors from trauma intensive care units (ICUs).Methods Within a published scoping review evaluating ICU patient outcomes after hospital discharge, two screeners independently searched...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open |
| Online Access: | https://tsaco.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000584.full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850062893524975616 |
|---|---|
| author | Dale M Needham Elizabeth Colantuoni Victor D Dinglas Himanshu Rawal Daniel L Young Roozbeh Nikooie Awsse H Al Ani Lisa Aronson Friedman Sumana Vasishta |
| author_facet | Dale M Needham Elizabeth Colantuoni Victor D Dinglas Himanshu Rawal Daniel L Young Roozbeh Nikooie Awsse H Al Ani Lisa Aronson Friedman Sumana Vasishta |
| author_sort | Dale M Needham |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background The study aimed to synthesize participant retention-related data for longitudinal follow-up studies of survivors from trauma intensive care units (ICUs).Methods Within a published scoping review evaluating ICU patient outcomes after hospital discharge, two screeners independently searched for trauma ICU survivorship studies.Results There were 11 trauma ICU follow-up studies, all of which were cohort studies. Twelve months (range: 1–60 months) was the most frequent follow-up time point for assessment (63% of studies). Retention rates ranged from 54% to 94% across time points and could not be calculated for two studies (18%). Pooled retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 75%, 81%, and 81%, respectively. Mean patient age (OR 0.85 per 1-year increase, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99, p=0.036), percent of men (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.10, p=0.002), and publication year (OR 0.89 per 1-year increase, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95, p=0.007) were associated with retention rates. Early (3-month) versus later (6-month, 12-month) follow-up time point was not associated with retention rates.Discussion Pooled retention rates were >75%, at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month time points, with wide variability across studies and time points. There was little consistency with reporting participant retention methodology and related data. More detailed reporting guidelines, with better author adherence, will help improve reporting of participant retention data. Utilization of existing research resources may help improve participant retention.Level of evidence Level III: meta-analyses (post-hoc analyses) of a prior scoping review. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e12ea9f35bad4ea891ce6dafa15ee6b8 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2397-5776 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-e12ea9f35bad4ea891ce6dafa15ee6b82025-08-20T02:49:48ZengBMJ Publishing GroupTrauma Surgery & Acute Care Open2397-57762020-12-015110.1136/tsaco-2020-000584Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping reviewDale M Needham0Elizabeth Colantuoni1Victor D Dinglas2Himanshu Rawal3Daniel L Young4Roozbeh Nikooie5Awsse H Al Ani6Lisa Aronson Friedman7Sumana Vasishta8Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medicine School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA7 Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University—Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USAPCCM, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USAPulmonary Disease and Critical Care Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USADepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USADepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USAMedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USAOutcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USAInstitute of Nephro Urology Mysuru Branch, Krishna Rajendra Hospital Campus, Mysuru, IndiaBackground The study aimed to synthesize participant retention-related data for longitudinal follow-up studies of survivors from trauma intensive care units (ICUs).Methods Within a published scoping review evaluating ICU patient outcomes after hospital discharge, two screeners independently searched for trauma ICU survivorship studies.Results There were 11 trauma ICU follow-up studies, all of which were cohort studies. Twelve months (range: 1–60 months) was the most frequent follow-up time point for assessment (63% of studies). Retention rates ranged from 54% to 94% across time points and could not be calculated for two studies (18%). Pooled retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 75%, 81%, and 81%, respectively. Mean patient age (OR 0.85 per 1-year increase, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99, p=0.036), percent of men (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.10, p=0.002), and publication year (OR 0.89 per 1-year increase, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.95, p=0.007) were associated with retention rates. Early (3-month) versus later (6-month, 12-month) follow-up time point was not associated with retention rates.Discussion Pooled retention rates were >75%, at 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month time points, with wide variability across studies and time points. There was little consistency with reporting participant retention methodology and related data. More detailed reporting guidelines, with better author adherence, will help improve reporting of participant retention data. Utilization of existing research resources may help improve participant retention.Level of evidence Level III: meta-analyses (post-hoc analyses) of a prior scoping review.https://tsaco.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000584.full |
| spellingShingle | Dale M Needham Elizabeth Colantuoni Victor D Dinglas Himanshu Rawal Daniel L Young Roozbeh Nikooie Awsse H Al Ani Lisa Aronson Friedman Sumana Vasishta Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping review Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open |
| title | Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping review |
| title_full | Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping review |
| title_fullStr | Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping review |
| title_short | Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping review |
| title_sort | participant retention in trauma intensive care unit icu follow up studies a post hoc analysis of a previous scoping review |
| url | https://tsaco.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000584.full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dalemneedham participantretentionintraumaintensivecareuniticufollowupstudiesaposthocanalysisofapreviousscopingreview AT elizabethcolantuoni participantretentionintraumaintensivecareuniticufollowupstudiesaposthocanalysisofapreviousscopingreview AT victorddinglas participantretentionintraumaintensivecareuniticufollowupstudiesaposthocanalysisofapreviousscopingreview AT himanshurawal participantretentionintraumaintensivecareuniticufollowupstudiesaposthocanalysisofapreviousscopingreview AT daniellyoung participantretentionintraumaintensivecareuniticufollowupstudiesaposthocanalysisofapreviousscopingreview AT roozbehnikooie participantretentionintraumaintensivecareuniticufollowupstudiesaposthocanalysisofapreviousscopingreview AT awssehalani participantretentionintraumaintensivecareuniticufollowupstudiesaposthocanalysisofapreviousscopingreview AT lisaaronsonfriedman participantretentionintraumaintensivecareuniticufollowupstudiesaposthocanalysisofapreviousscopingreview AT sumanavasishta participantretentionintraumaintensivecareuniticufollowupstudiesaposthocanalysisofapreviousscopingreview |