THE LIMITS OF THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
The relevance of the study of the features of the use of artificial intelligence in criminal proceedings at the judicial stage is due to the fragmented regulation of this toolkit and the lack of a single normative legal act that establishes the grounds and limits of the operation of this technology....
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
LLC «MIAS Expert»
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Legal Bulletin |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://en.legalbulletin.ru/data/documents/LB2024no4_13.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850262279745961984 |
|---|---|
| author | RUDENKO D.A. |
| author_facet | RUDENKO D.A. |
| author_sort | RUDENKO D.A. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The relevance of the study of the features of the use of artificial intelligence in criminal proceedings at the judicial stage is due to the fragmented regulation of this toolkit and the lack of a single normative legal act that establishes the grounds and limits of the operation of this technology. The main purpose of the article is to determine the limits of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the administration of justice in criminal cases. The methods used. The methodological basis was the provisions of materialistic dialectics as a general scientific method of cognition used to identify the essence of digital technology and to understand the specifics of its use in the field of criminal justice. A set of general scientific and special methods has also been applied to ensure the objectivity, comprehensiveness and completeness of the study of the subject of research. The author uses normative legal acts, the approaches of scientists, the experience of foreign countries in the context of the prospects for the use of artificial intelligence at the judicial stage, as well as the professional experience of the author, who is a practicing lawyer, as a theoretical and empirical base. The problems under consideration. The author raises the problem of uncertainty of the limits of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the administration of justice in criminal cases. Within the framework of this problem, the question of the possibility of a total replacement of a human judge by a robot machine is being considered.
Conclusions. The author, concluding that adjudication cannot be delegated to artificial intelligence, justifies the allocation of five acceptable areas of its use within the judicial stage of criminal proceedings: solving repetitive tasks by intelligent analysis of an array of data (optimization function), monitoring compliance by the court with formal requirements and rules (control function), prompt establishment of legally significant circumstances during the judicial review of criminal cases (auxiliary function), support for the judge’s decision-making (the function of assistance in decision-making), assistance to the court in the statistical field (statistical function). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e11bd124f7bc40d7ba34a6652b220d62 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2658-5448 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | LLC «MIAS Expert» |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Legal Bulletin |
| spelling | doaj-art-e11bd124f7bc40d7ba34a6652b220d622025-08-20T01:55:12ZengLLC «MIAS Expert»Legal Bulletin2658-54482025-01-0194161170https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14638772THE LIMITS OF THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICERUDENKO D.A.0St. Petersburg State UniversityThe relevance of the study of the features of the use of artificial intelligence in criminal proceedings at the judicial stage is due to the fragmented regulation of this toolkit and the lack of a single normative legal act that establishes the grounds and limits of the operation of this technology. The main purpose of the article is to determine the limits of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the administration of justice in criminal cases. The methods used. The methodological basis was the provisions of materialistic dialectics as a general scientific method of cognition used to identify the essence of digital technology and to understand the specifics of its use in the field of criminal justice. A set of general scientific and special methods has also been applied to ensure the objectivity, comprehensiveness and completeness of the study of the subject of research. The author uses normative legal acts, the approaches of scientists, the experience of foreign countries in the context of the prospects for the use of artificial intelligence at the judicial stage, as well as the professional experience of the author, who is a practicing lawyer, as a theoretical and empirical base. The problems under consideration. The author raises the problem of uncertainty of the limits of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the administration of justice in criminal cases. Within the framework of this problem, the question of the possibility of a total replacement of a human judge by a robot machine is being considered. Conclusions. The author, concluding that adjudication cannot be delegated to artificial intelligence, justifies the allocation of five acceptable areas of its use within the judicial stage of criminal proceedings: solving repetitive tasks by intelligent analysis of an array of data (optimization function), monitoring compliance by the court with formal requirements and rules (control function), prompt establishment of legally significant circumstances during the judicial review of criminal cases (auxiliary function), support for the judge’s decision-making (the function of assistance in decision-making), assistance to the court in the statistical field (statistical function).https://en.legalbulletin.ru/data/documents/LB2024no4_13.pdfartificial intelligencejudicial stagealgorithmizationcriminal processcriminal proceedingselectronic justice |
| spellingShingle | RUDENKO D.A. THE LIMITS OF THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE Legal Bulletin artificial intelligence judicial stage algorithmization criminal process criminal proceedings electronic justice |
| title | THE LIMITS OF THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
| title_full | THE LIMITS OF THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
| title_fullStr | THE LIMITS OF THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE LIMITS OF THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
| title_short | THE LIMITS OF THE APPLICABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE |
| title_sort | limits of the applicability of artificial intelligence technologies in the administration of criminal justice |
| topic | artificial intelligence judicial stage algorithmization criminal process criminal proceedings electronic justice |
| url | https://en.legalbulletin.ru/data/documents/LB2024no4_13.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rudenkoda thelimitsoftheapplicabilityofartificialintelligencetechnologiesintheadministrationofcriminaljustice AT rudenkoda limitsoftheapplicabilityofartificialintelligencetechnologiesintheadministrationofcriminaljustice |