Transparency and Trust in the United States’ Response to and Attitudes about Climate Change

This article explores the concept of “climate transparency” in two related settings: in communication about climate change policy by US political elites and in public opinion among the US population. We consider the meaning of the term “transparency” and how climate transparency has risen to promine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denise Milizia, Laura R. Olson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona 2025-06-01
Series:Iperstoria
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iperstoria.it/article/view/1571
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849687186474008576
author Denise Milizia
Laura R. Olson
author_facet Denise Milizia
Laura R. Olson
author_sort Denise Milizia
collection DOAJ
description This article explores the concept of “climate transparency” in two related settings: in communication about climate change policy by US political elites and in public opinion among the US population. We consider the meaning of the term “transparency” and how climate transparency has risen to prominence in the worldwide effort to combat climate change. We then analyse two sides of transparency in the United States’ treatment of the climate crisis: what political leaders have said about climate transparency and how the public has perceived it. Our analysis combines two methodological approaches: linguistic corpus analysis and public opinion data analysis. The corpus, which includes speeches delivered by Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, John Kerry and Al Gore at COP summits, illustrates how the United States has contributed to transparent approaches to fighting climate change. This analysis emphasises US political leaders’ usage of the terms “accountable,” “candid,” “honest,” and “transparent;” “fossil fuels” and “decarbonisation” (as transparency requires the problem to be named directly); and “science” and “scientists” (the source of information that needs to be shared transparently). Meanwhile, analysis of public opinion data from a large sample of Americans reveals that individuals who agree with the Biden administration on climate policy are especially inclined to view the administration as transparent and trustworthy, as are those who have confidence in scientists, liberals, and older, better educated, and non-white Americans. The corpus analysis speaks directly to the public opinion analysis, as we examine the circumstances under which leaders who prioritise climate protection are perceived as transparent and trustworthy.
format Article
id doaj-art-e111d7a30b7543b99f8cd0ad13643a89
institution DOAJ
issn 2281-4582
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona
record_format Article
series Iperstoria
spelling doaj-art-e111d7a30b7543b99f8cd0ad13643a892025-08-20T03:22:22ZengDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of VeronaIperstoria2281-45822025-06-012510.13136/2281-4582/2025.i25.15711555Transparency and Trust in the United States’ Response to and Attitudes about Climate ChangeDenise Milizia0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7807-039XLaura R. Olson1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3182-7978University of Bari Aldo MoroClemson UniversityThis article explores the concept of “climate transparency” in two related settings: in communication about climate change policy by US political elites and in public opinion among the US population. We consider the meaning of the term “transparency” and how climate transparency has risen to prominence in the worldwide effort to combat climate change. We then analyse two sides of transparency in the United States’ treatment of the climate crisis: what political leaders have said about climate transparency and how the public has perceived it. Our analysis combines two methodological approaches: linguistic corpus analysis and public opinion data analysis. The corpus, which includes speeches delivered by Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, John Kerry and Al Gore at COP summits, illustrates how the United States has contributed to transparent approaches to fighting climate change. This analysis emphasises US political leaders’ usage of the terms “accountable,” “candid,” “honest,” and “transparent;” “fossil fuels” and “decarbonisation” (as transparency requires the problem to be named directly); and “science” and “scientists” (the source of information that needs to be shared transparently). Meanwhile, analysis of public opinion data from a large sample of Americans reveals that individuals who agree with the Biden administration on climate policy are especially inclined to view the administration as transparent and trustworthy, as are those who have confidence in scientists, liberals, and older, better educated, and non-white Americans. The corpus analysis speaks directly to the public opinion analysis, as we examine the circumstances under which leaders who prioritise climate protection are perceived as transparent and trustworthy.https://iperstoria.it/article/view/1571climate changetransparencycorpus analysispublic opinionunited states
spellingShingle Denise Milizia
Laura R. Olson
Transparency and Trust in the United States’ Response to and Attitudes about Climate Change
Iperstoria
climate change
transparency
corpus analysis
public opinion
united states
title Transparency and Trust in the United States’ Response to and Attitudes about Climate Change
title_full Transparency and Trust in the United States’ Response to and Attitudes about Climate Change
title_fullStr Transparency and Trust in the United States’ Response to and Attitudes about Climate Change
title_full_unstemmed Transparency and Trust in the United States’ Response to and Attitudes about Climate Change
title_short Transparency and Trust in the United States’ Response to and Attitudes about Climate Change
title_sort transparency and trust in the united states response to and attitudes about climate change
topic climate change
transparency
corpus analysis
public opinion
united states
url https://iperstoria.it/article/view/1571
work_keys_str_mv AT denisemilizia transparencyandtrustintheunitedstatesresponsetoandattitudesaboutclimatechange
AT laurarolson transparencyandtrustintheunitedstatesresponsetoandattitudesaboutclimatechange