Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements
ABSTRACT Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land‐intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | GCB Bioenergy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70026 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850206710757588992 |
|---|---|
| author | Bethany Blakely Caitlin E. Moore Taylor L. Pederson Christy D. Gibson Michael C. Benson Evan Dracup Carl J. Bernacchi |
| author_facet | Bethany Blakely Caitlin E. Moore Taylor L. Pederson Christy D. Gibson Michael C. Benson Evan Dracup Carl J. Bernacchi |
| author_sort | Bethany Blakely |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land‐intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental costs, prompting the development of several alternative bioenergy feedstocks. These feedstocks, selected in part for traits associated with ecosystem services, may provide opportunities for environmental benefits beyond fossil fuel displacement. We hypothesized that these bioenergy ecosystems will provide direct climatic cooling through their influence on carbon and radiative energy fluxes (i.e., through albedo). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential cooling effect of five current or potential bioenergy feedstocks using multi‐year records from eddy covariance towers. Perennial feedstocks were carbon sinks, with an annual mean net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of −2.7 ± 2.1 Mg C ha−1 for miscanthus, −0.8 ± 1.1 Mg C ha−1 for switchgrass, and −1.4 ± 0.7 Mg C ha−1 for prairie. In contrast, annual rotations were generally carbon sources, with an annual mean NECB of 2.6 ± 2.4 Mg C ha−1 for maize‐soy and 3.2 ± 2.1 Mg C ha−1 for sorghum‐soy. Using maize‐soy as a baseline, conversion to alternative feedstocks increased albedo, inducing further cooling. This effect was strongest for miscanthus, with −3.5 ± 2.0 W m−2 of radiative forcing, and weakest for sorghum, with −1.4 ± 1.4 W m−2. When feedstock effects on carbon and albedo were compared using carbon equivalents, carbon fluxes were the stronger ecosystem effect, underscoring the role of perennial species as effective carbon sinks. This work highlights the impact of feedstock choice on ecosystem processes as an element of bioenergy land conversion strategies. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e10926bdc9af4dcb9fa0070d7c912ede |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1757-1693 1757-1707 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | GCB Bioenergy |
| spelling | doaj-art-e10926bdc9af4dcb9fa0070d7c912ede2025-08-20T02:10:42ZengWileyGCB Bioenergy1757-16931757-17072025-04-01174n/an/a10.1111/gcbb.70026Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux MeasurementsBethany Blakely0Caitlin E. Moore1Taylor L. Pederson2Christy D. Gibson3Michael C. Benson4Evan Dracup5Carl J. Bernacchi6Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USAInstitute for Sustainability, Energy, and Environment University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USACenter for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USACenter for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USACenter for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USADepartment of Plant Biology University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USACenter for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana Illinois USAABSTRACT Bioenergy from biofuels has the potential to slow growing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations by reducing fossil fuel use. However, growing bioenergy feedstocks is a land‐intensive process. In the United States, the recent expansion of maize bioethanol has presented some environmental costs, prompting the development of several alternative bioenergy feedstocks. These feedstocks, selected in part for traits associated with ecosystem services, may provide opportunities for environmental benefits beyond fossil fuel displacement. We hypothesized that these bioenergy ecosystems will provide direct climatic cooling through their influence on carbon and radiative energy fluxes (i.e., through albedo). To test this hypothesis, we investigated the potential cooling effect of five current or potential bioenergy feedstocks using multi‐year records from eddy covariance towers. Perennial feedstocks were carbon sinks, with an annual mean net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) of −2.7 ± 2.1 Mg C ha−1 for miscanthus, −0.8 ± 1.1 Mg C ha−1 for switchgrass, and −1.4 ± 0.7 Mg C ha−1 for prairie. In contrast, annual rotations were generally carbon sources, with an annual mean NECB of 2.6 ± 2.4 Mg C ha−1 for maize‐soy and 3.2 ± 2.1 Mg C ha−1 for sorghum‐soy. Using maize‐soy as a baseline, conversion to alternative feedstocks increased albedo, inducing further cooling. This effect was strongest for miscanthus, with −3.5 ± 2.0 W m−2 of radiative forcing, and weakest for sorghum, with −1.4 ± 1.4 W m−2. When feedstock effects on carbon and albedo were compared using carbon equivalents, carbon fluxes were the stronger ecosystem effect, underscoring the role of perennial species as effective carbon sinks. This work highlights the impact of feedstock choice on ecosystem processes as an element of bioenergy land conversion strategies.https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70026albedocarbon balancecellulosic feedstockseddy covarianceenergy sorghumlong‐term |
| spellingShingle | Bethany Blakely Caitlin E. Moore Taylor L. Pederson Christy D. Gibson Michael C. Benson Evan Dracup Carl J. Bernacchi Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements GCB Bioenergy albedo carbon balance cellulosic feedstocks eddy covariance energy sorghum long‐term |
| title | Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements |
| title_full | Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements |
| title_fullStr | Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements |
| title_full_unstemmed | Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements |
| title_short | Climate Forcing of Bioenergy Feedstocks: Insights From Carbon and Energy Flux Measurements |
| title_sort | climate forcing of bioenergy feedstocks insights from carbon and energy flux measurements |
| topic | albedo carbon balance cellulosic feedstocks eddy covariance energy sorghum long‐term |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70026 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bethanyblakely climateforcingofbioenergyfeedstocksinsightsfromcarbonandenergyfluxmeasurements AT caitlinemoore climateforcingofbioenergyfeedstocksinsightsfromcarbonandenergyfluxmeasurements AT taylorlpederson climateforcingofbioenergyfeedstocksinsightsfromcarbonandenergyfluxmeasurements AT christydgibson climateforcingofbioenergyfeedstocksinsightsfromcarbonandenergyfluxmeasurements AT michaelcbenson climateforcingofbioenergyfeedstocksinsightsfromcarbonandenergyfluxmeasurements AT evandracup climateforcingofbioenergyfeedstocksinsightsfromcarbonandenergyfluxmeasurements AT carljbernacchi climateforcingofbioenergyfeedstocksinsightsfromcarbonandenergyfluxmeasurements |