Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Conclusion: The sheathless TR approach showed lower rates of RAS and femoral conversion. Sheathless has a higher success rate; however, it also increased RAO. Thus, more trials are needed to confirm this technique’s long-term outcomes and complications.
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/2777585 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849467919463874560 |
|---|---|
| author | Zuhair Majeed Muhammad Haider Tariq Arslan Ahmed Muhammad Usama Ahmed Mazen Amin Abira Khan Muhammad Shahzaib Bajwa Muhammad Faiq Umar Mustafa Turkmani Mohamed Abuelazm Ubaid Khan |
| author_facet | Zuhair Majeed Muhammad Haider Tariq Arslan Ahmed Muhammad Usama Ahmed Mazen Amin Abira Khan Muhammad Shahzaib Bajwa Muhammad Faiq Umar Mustafa Turkmani Mohamed Abuelazm Ubaid Khan |
| author_sort | Zuhair Majeed |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Conclusion: The sheathless TR approach showed lower rates of RAS and femoral conversion. Sheathless has a higher success rate; however, it also increased RAO. Thus, more trials are needed to confirm this technique’s long-term outcomes and complications. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e0dfb59b8bfe46a2aec6f0d2aa1117f6 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1540-8183 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
| spelling | doaj-art-e0dfb59b8bfe46a2aec6f0d2aa1117f62025-08-20T03:25:59ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832024-01-01202410.1155/2024/2777585Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisZuhair Majeed0Muhammad Haider Tariq1Arslan Ahmed2Muhammad Usama3Ahmed Mazen Amin4Abira Khan5Muhammad Shahzaib Bajwa6Muhammad Faiq Umar7Mustafa Turkmani8Mohamed Abuelazm9Ubaid Khan10Department of MedicineDepartment of MedicineDepartment of MedicineDepartment of MedicineFaculty of MedicineDepartment of MedicineDepartment of MedicineDepartment of MedicineFaculty of MedicineFaculty of MedicineDivision of CardiologyConclusion: The sheathless TR approach showed lower rates of RAS and femoral conversion. Sheathless has a higher success rate; however, it also increased RAO. Thus, more trials are needed to confirm this technique’s long-term outcomes and complications.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/2777585 |
| spellingShingle | Zuhair Majeed Muhammad Haider Tariq Arslan Ahmed Muhammad Usama Ahmed Mazen Amin Abira Khan Muhammad Shahzaib Bajwa Muhammad Faiq Umar Mustafa Turkmani Mohamed Abuelazm Ubaid Khan Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
| title | Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_full | Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_short | Comparison of Sheathless and Sheathed Guiding Catheters in Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
| title_sort | comparison of sheathless and sheathed guiding catheters in transradial percutaneous coronary interventions a systematic review and meta analysis |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/2777585 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zuhairmajeed comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT muhammadhaidertariq comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT arslanahmed comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT muhammadusama comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ahmedmazenamin comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT abirakhan comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT muhammadshahzaibbajwa comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT muhammadfaiqumar comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mustafaturkmani comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mohamedabuelazm comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ubaidkhan comparisonofsheathlessandsheathedguidingcathetersintransradialpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |