Asymmetric evaluations of scientific evidence indicating harm compared to evidence indicating an absence of harm in regulatory appraisals
Abstract This paper asks whether, when assessing the safety of regulated products, the standards of scrutiny and evaluation deployed by regulatory officials and scientific advisors differ for evidence indicating that a product might be harmful compared to evidence indicating an absence of harm. Four...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Patrick van Zwanenberg, Erik Millstone, Alice Livingston Ortolani |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2025-08-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Sciences Europe |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01176-9 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Use of real-world data as pivotal evidence in veterinary regulatory applications
by: Raffaele Bruno
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Research on Application of Medical Device Real-World Evidence in Regulatory Decisions of the United States
by: Xiaofang GU, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Scientists’ Coalition perspectives on articles of the Chair’s text
by: Trisia Farrelly, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The Admissibility of Scientific Expert Evidence Under Indonesian Criminal Justice System
by: Wanodyo Sulistyani
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Standards for Including Scientific Evidence in Restrictions on Freedom of Movement: The Case of EU Covid Certificates Scheme
by: Danaja Fabcic Povse, et al.
Published: (2025-03-01)