Long‐term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer: An EORTC risk‐matched study

Abstract Introduction Elderly and comorbid patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) often undergo repeated transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) under general anaesthesia. Transurethral laser ablation (TULA) is an outpatient‐based alternative with lower morbidity, cost an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chase Peng Yun Ng, Alexander Light, Charis Eleftheriou, Oliver Hug, Ellie Richardson, Tarra Gill‐Taylor, Altaf Shamsuddin, Hamid Abboudi, Sachin Agrawal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:BJUI Compass
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70052
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849251814285770752
author Chase Peng Yun Ng
Alexander Light
Charis Eleftheriou
Oliver Hug
Ellie Richardson
Tarra Gill‐Taylor
Altaf Shamsuddin
Hamid Abboudi
Sachin Agrawal
author_facet Chase Peng Yun Ng
Alexander Light
Charis Eleftheriou
Oliver Hug
Ellie Richardson
Tarra Gill‐Taylor
Altaf Shamsuddin
Hamid Abboudi
Sachin Agrawal
author_sort Chase Peng Yun Ng
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Elderly and comorbid patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) often undergo repeated transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) under general anaesthesia. Transurethral laser ablation (TULA) is an outpatient‐based alternative with lower morbidity, cost and carbon footprint, but its long‐term efficacy is not well‐established. We report the long‐term outcomes of recurrent NMIBC treated with TULA, stratified by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk groups. Materials and Methods We conducted a single‐centre, retrospective cohort study, including all consecutive NMIBC patients treated with TULA between 2012 and 2023. The primary outcomes were recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) and secondary outcomes included cancer‐specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and complications, stratified by EORTC risk groups. Data were analysed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model. Results Three hundred and nineteen patients (1186 TULAs), with a median age of 77 and median Charleson Comorbidity Index of 7, were included. Median follow up was 4.4 years. The 5‐year RFS of intermediate‐risk and high‐risk NMIBC treated with TULA were 31.8% (95%CI:25.6–39.7%) and 29.0% (95%CI: 20.1–42.0%), respectively, with no significant difference (p:0.47). The 5‐year PFS were 86.8% (95%CI: 82.1–91.7%) and 93.1% (95%CI: 85.2–100.0%), respectively. Overall, the 10‐year OS and CSS were 50.7% (95% CI: 41.8–61.5%) and 96.1% (95%CI: 93.3–98.9%), respectively. The complication rate was 4.0%. Age was the only positive predictor of recurrence. Limitations include missing data (7.9%) and single‐centre retrospective design. Conclusion TULA is a safe, minimally invasive treatment with long‐term efficacy for elderly and comorbid patients with recurrent NMIBC. Although recurrence rate at 5 years were high, progression rate, especially muscle invasion, was low and reassuring. Long‐term overall survival and cancer‐specific survival remained excellent.
format Article
id doaj-art-e0b271e79043466d89e2413fc7ade968
institution Kabale University
issn 2688-4526
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series BJUI Compass
spelling doaj-art-e0b271e79043466d89e2413fc7ade9682025-08-20T03:56:49ZengWileyBJUI Compass2688-45262025-07-0167n/an/a10.1002/bco2.70052Long‐term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer: An EORTC risk‐matched studyChase Peng Yun Ng0Alexander Light1Charis Eleftheriou2Oliver Hug3Ellie Richardson4Tarra Gill‐Taylor5Altaf Shamsuddin6Hamid Abboudi7Sachin Agrawal8Imperial Urology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKImperial Urology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKImperial Urology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKImperial Urology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKImperial Urology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKImperial Urology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKImperial Urology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKImperial Urology Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London UKDepartment of Urology Ashford and St Peter's Hospital NHS Trust Ashford UKAbstract Introduction Elderly and comorbid patients with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) often undergo repeated transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) under general anaesthesia. Transurethral laser ablation (TULA) is an outpatient‐based alternative with lower morbidity, cost and carbon footprint, but its long‐term efficacy is not well‐established. We report the long‐term outcomes of recurrent NMIBC treated with TULA, stratified by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk groups. Materials and Methods We conducted a single‐centre, retrospective cohort study, including all consecutive NMIBC patients treated with TULA between 2012 and 2023. The primary outcomes were recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) and secondary outcomes included cancer‐specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and complications, stratified by EORTC risk groups. Data were analysed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox regression model. Results Three hundred and nineteen patients (1186 TULAs), with a median age of 77 and median Charleson Comorbidity Index of 7, were included. Median follow up was 4.4 years. The 5‐year RFS of intermediate‐risk and high‐risk NMIBC treated with TULA were 31.8% (95%CI:25.6–39.7%) and 29.0% (95%CI: 20.1–42.0%), respectively, with no significant difference (p:0.47). The 5‐year PFS were 86.8% (95%CI: 82.1–91.7%) and 93.1% (95%CI: 85.2–100.0%), respectively. Overall, the 10‐year OS and CSS were 50.7% (95% CI: 41.8–61.5%) and 96.1% (95%CI: 93.3–98.9%), respectively. The complication rate was 4.0%. Age was the only positive predictor of recurrence. Limitations include missing data (7.9%) and single‐centre retrospective design. Conclusion TULA is a safe, minimally invasive treatment with long‐term efficacy for elderly and comorbid patients with recurrent NMIBC. Although recurrence rate at 5 years were high, progression rate, especially muscle invasion, was low and reassuring. Long‐term overall survival and cancer‐specific survival remained excellent.https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70052ablationbladder tumourlaserlong termnon‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancerprogression
spellingShingle Chase Peng Yun Ng
Alexander Light
Charis Eleftheriou
Oliver Hug
Ellie Richardson
Tarra Gill‐Taylor
Altaf Shamsuddin
Hamid Abboudi
Sachin Agrawal
Long‐term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer: An EORTC risk‐matched study
BJUI Compass
ablation
bladder tumour
laser
long term
non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
progression
title Long‐term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer: An EORTC risk‐matched study
title_full Long‐term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer: An EORTC risk‐matched study
title_fullStr Long‐term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer: An EORTC risk‐matched study
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer: An EORTC risk‐matched study
title_short Long‐term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer: An EORTC risk‐matched study
title_sort long term outcome of transurethral laser ablation for recurrent non muscle invasive bladder cancer an eortc risk matched study
topic ablation
bladder tumour
laser
long term
non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer
progression
url https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70052
work_keys_str_mv AT chasepengyunng longtermoutcomeoftransurethrallaserablationforrecurrentnonmuscleinvasivebladdercanceraneortcriskmatchedstudy
AT alexanderlight longtermoutcomeoftransurethrallaserablationforrecurrentnonmuscleinvasivebladdercanceraneortcriskmatchedstudy
AT chariseleftheriou longtermoutcomeoftransurethrallaserablationforrecurrentnonmuscleinvasivebladdercanceraneortcriskmatchedstudy
AT oliverhug longtermoutcomeoftransurethrallaserablationforrecurrentnonmuscleinvasivebladdercanceraneortcriskmatchedstudy
AT ellierichardson longtermoutcomeoftransurethrallaserablationforrecurrentnonmuscleinvasivebladdercanceraneortcriskmatchedstudy
AT tarragilltaylor longtermoutcomeoftransurethrallaserablationforrecurrentnonmuscleinvasivebladdercanceraneortcriskmatchedstudy
AT altafshamsuddin longtermoutcomeoftransurethrallaserablationforrecurrentnonmuscleinvasivebladdercanceraneortcriskmatchedstudy
AT hamidabboudi longtermoutcomeoftransurethrallaserablationforrecurrentnonmuscleinvasivebladdercanceraneortcriskmatchedstudy
AT sachinagrawal longtermoutcomeoftransurethrallaserablationforrecurrentnonmuscleinvasivebladdercanceraneortcriskmatchedstudy