Between-monitor differences in step counts are related to body size: implications for objective physical activity measurement.

<h4>Background</h4>The quantification of the relationships between walking and health requires that walking is measured accurately. We correlated different measures of step accumulation to body size, overall physical activity level, and glucose regulation.<h4>Methods</h4>Part...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeremy Pomeroy, Søren Brage, Jeffrey M Curtis, Pamela D Swan, William C Knowler, Paul W Franks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2011-04-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0018942&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849336599348772864
author Jeremy Pomeroy
Søren Brage
Jeffrey M Curtis
Pamela D Swan
William C Knowler
Paul W Franks
author_facet Jeremy Pomeroy
Søren Brage
Jeffrey M Curtis
Pamela D Swan
William C Knowler
Paul W Franks
author_sort Jeremy Pomeroy
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>The quantification of the relationships between walking and health requires that walking is measured accurately. We correlated different measures of step accumulation to body size, overall physical activity level, and glucose regulation.<h4>Methods</h4>Participants were 25 men and 25 women American Indians without diabetes (Age: 20-34 years) in Phoenix, Arizona, USA. We assessed steps/day during 7 days of free living, simultaneously with three different monitors (Accusplit-AX120, MTI-ActiGraph, and Dynastream-AMP). We assessed total physical activity during free-living with doubly labeled water combined with resting metabolic rate measured by expired gas indirect calorimetry. Glucose tolerance was determined during an oral glucose tolerance test.<h4>Findings</h4>Based on observed counts in the laboratory, the AMP was the most accurate device, followed by the MTI and the AX120, respectively. The estimated energy cost of 1000 steps per day was lower in the AX120 than the MTI or AMP. The correlation between AX120-assessed steps/day and waist circumference was significantly higher than the correlation between AMP steps and waist circumference. The difference in steps per day between the AX120 and both the AMP and the MTI were significantly related to waist circumference.<h4>Interpretation</h4>Between-monitor differences in step counts influence the observed relationship between walking and obesity-related traits.
format Article
id doaj-art-e0aafb6baddc482683b133c22d7e723e
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2011-04-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-e0aafb6baddc482683b133c22d7e723e2025-08-20T03:44:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-04-0164e1894210.1371/journal.pone.0018942Between-monitor differences in step counts are related to body size: implications for objective physical activity measurement.Jeremy PomeroySøren BrageJeffrey M CurtisPamela D SwanWilliam C KnowlerPaul W Franks<h4>Background</h4>The quantification of the relationships between walking and health requires that walking is measured accurately. We correlated different measures of step accumulation to body size, overall physical activity level, and glucose regulation.<h4>Methods</h4>Participants were 25 men and 25 women American Indians without diabetes (Age: 20-34 years) in Phoenix, Arizona, USA. We assessed steps/day during 7 days of free living, simultaneously with three different monitors (Accusplit-AX120, MTI-ActiGraph, and Dynastream-AMP). We assessed total physical activity during free-living with doubly labeled water combined with resting metabolic rate measured by expired gas indirect calorimetry. Glucose tolerance was determined during an oral glucose tolerance test.<h4>Findings</h4>Based on observed counts in the laboratory, the AMP was the most accurate device, followed by the MTI and the AX120, respectively. The estimated energy cost of 1000 steps per day was lower in the AX120 than the MTI or AMP. The correlation between AX120-assessed steps/day and waist circumference was significantly higher than the correlation between AMP steps and waist circumference. The difference in steps per day between the AX120 and both the AMP and the MTI were significantly related to waist circumference.<h4>Interpretation</h4>Between-monitor differences in step counts influence the observed relationship between walking and obesity-related traits.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0018942&type=printable
spellingShingle Jeremy Pomeroy
Søren Brage
Jeffrey M Curtis
Pamela D Swan
William C Knowler
Paul W Franks
Between-monitor differences in step counts are related to body size: implications for objective physical activity measurement.
PLoS ONE
title Between-monitor differences in step counts are related to body size: implications for objective physical activity measurement.
title_full Between-monitor differences in step counts are related to body size: implications for objective physical activity measurement.
title_fullStr Between-monitor differences in step counts are related to body size: implications for objective physical activity measurement.
title_full_unstemmed Between-monitor differences in step counts are related to body size: implications for objective physical activity measurement.
title_short Between-monitor differences in step counts are related to body size: implications for objective physical activity measurement.
title_sort between monitor differences in step counts are related to body size implications for objective physical activity measurement
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0018942&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT jeremypomeroy betweenmonitordifferencesinstepcountsarerelatedtobodysizeimplicationsforobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurement
AT sørenbrage betweenmonitordifferencesinstepcountsarerelatedtobodysizeimplicationsforobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurement
AT jeffreymcurtis betweenmonitordifferencesinstepcountsarerelatedtobodysizeimplicationsforobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurement
AT pameladswan betweenmonitordifferencesinstepcountsarerelatedtobodysizeimplicationsforobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurement
AT williamcknowler betweenmonitordifferencesinstepcountsarerelatedtobodysizeimplicationsforobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurement
AT paulwfranks betweenmonitordifferencesinstepcountsarerelatedtobodysizeimplicationsforobjectivephysicalactivitymeasurement