VPNs as boundary objects of the internet: (mis)trust in the translation(s)

How do we come to trust, use and govern virtual private networks (VPNs)? How do these objects of the internet tack back and forth between metaphor and technical processes as they garner usership and critique? This paper aims to answer these questions by considering VPNs as boundary objects. We follo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luke Heemsbergen, Adam Molnar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society 2020-10-01
Series:Internet Policy Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://policyreview.info/node/1513
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850073822215012352
author Luke Heemsbergen
Adam Molnar
author_facet Luke Heemsbergen
Adam Molnar
author_sort Luke Heemsbergen
collection DOAJ
description How do we come to trust, use and govern virtual private networks (VPNs)? How do these objects of the internet tack back and forth between metaphor and technical processes as they garner usership and critique? This paper aims to answer these questions by considering VPNs as boundary objects. We follow Susan Leigh Star’s (2010) call to further explore the ‘tacking’ back and forth of boundary objects as both symbolic and technical objects. This is applied within internet-space and governance-space through empirical methods that walkthrough a typical user experience for acquiring VPN services, while also offering a systemic account of the discourse that such a user would experience in coming to understand VPNs and their function.
format Article
id doaj-art-e0439e0b378a4f2ab24d62c6cf67f3cd
institution DOAJ
issn 2197-6775
language English
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
record_format Article
series Internet Policy Review
spelling doaj-art-e0439e0b378a4f2ab24d62c6cf67f3cd2025-08-20T02:46:43ZengAlexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and SocietyInternet Policy Review2197-67752020-10-019410.14763/2020.4.1513VPNs as boundary objects of the internet: (mis)trust in the translation(s)Luke Heemsbergen0Adam Molnar1Deakin UniversityUniversity of WaterlooHow do we come to trust, use and govern virtual private networks (VPNs)? How do these objects of the internet tack back and forth between metaphor and technical processes as they garner usership and critique? This paper aims to answer these questions by considering VPNs as boundary objects. We follow Susan Leigh Star’s (2010) call to further explore the ‘tacking’ back and forth of boundary objects as both symbolic and technical objects. This is applied within internet-space and governance-space through empirical methods that walkthrough a typical user experience for acquiring VPN services, while also offering a systemic account of the discourse that such a user would experience in coming to understand VPNs and their function.https://policyreview.info/node/1513Boundary objectMetaphorRegulationPrivacySecurity
spellingShingle Luke Heemsbergen
Adam Molnar
VPNs as boundary objects of the internet: (mis)trust in the translation(s)
Internet Policy Review
Boundary object
Metaphor
Regulation
Privacy
Security
title VPNs as boundary objects of the internet: (mis)trust in the translation(s)
title_full VPNs as boundary objects of the internet: (mis)trust in the translation(s)
title_fullStr VPNs as boundary objects of the internet: (mis)trust in the translation(s)
title_full_unstemmed VPNs as boundary objects of the internet: (mis)trust in the translation(s)
title_short VPNs as boundary objects of the internet: (mis)trust in the translation(s)
title_sort vpns as boundary objects of the internet mis trust in the translation s
topic Boundary object
Metaphor
Regulation
Privacy
Security
url https://policyreview.info/node/1513
work_keys_str_mv AT lukeheemsbergen vpnsasboundaryobjectsoftheinternetmistrustinthetranslations
AT adammolnar vpnsasboundaryobjectsoftheinternetmistrustinthetranslations