Psychometric assessment of scales used to evaluate sexual assault prevention programming in the United States Air Force.

<h4>Background</h4>Preventing sexual assault in the United States (U.S.) military is essential to safeguard the overall well-being of military personnel and support the military to function in alignment with its intended mission and objectives. Valid instruments are needed to accurately...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathryn E L Grimes, Nichole M Scaglione, Marni L Kan, Leah Frerichs, Christopher M Shea, Angela M Stover
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317557
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540288131792896
author Kathryn E L Grimes
Nichole M Scaglione
Marni L Kan
Leah Frerichs
Christopher M Shea
Angela M Stover
author_facet Kathryn E L Grimes
Nichole M Scaglione
Marni L Kan
Leah Frerichs
Christopher M Shea
Angela M Stover
author_sort Kathryn E L Grimes
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Preventing sexual assault in the United States (U.S.) military is essential to safeguard the overall well-being of military personnel and support the military to function in alignment with its intended mission and objectives. Valid instruments are needed to accurately and reliably evaluate programming effectiveness. The goal of this research was to psychometrically assess measures used to evaluate the Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) program within the Air Force Basic Military Training (BMT) context.<h4>Methods</h4>We evaluated four measures used to assess the SCC program implemented at Air Force BMT in 2019-2020: Date Rape Attitudes, Self-Efficacy to Resist Unwanted Advances, Risky and Protective Dating Behaviors, and Bystander Intentions. The analytic sample included 7,126 BMT trainees (74% male). We assessed structural validity with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We used full information maximum likelihood estimation with robust standard errors in Mplus. We refined each scale based on factor analysis results and assessed internal consistency reliability by computing Cronbach's coefficient alpha for each scale in the overall sample, by sex, and by tailored SCC intervention group.<h4>Results</h4>We identified a two-factor structure for the Date Rape Attitudes scale; subscale reliability was moderate within the overall sample and among males, though low among females. We found single-factor structures and excellent reliability for both the Self-Efficacy to Resist Unwanted Advances scale and the Bystander Intentions scale. The Dating Behaviors scale CFA did not confirm the two-factor solution suggested by the EFA, but subscale reliability was acceptable.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This research fills a critical gap in the psychometric literature in military settings. Based on our findings, we recommend approaches for using the finalized scales in future evaluations of sexual assault prevention programming in the U.S. Air Force BMT setting.
format Article
id doaj-art-e040f9b8da7646e1b62807af04727754
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-e040f9b8da7646e1b62807af047277542025-02-05T05:31:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01201e031755710.1371/journal.pone.0317557Psychometric assessment of scales used to evaluate sexual assault prevention programming in the United States Air Force.Kathryn E L GrimesNichole M ScaglioneMarni L KanLeah FrerichsChristopher M SheaAngela M Stover<h4>Background</h4>Preventing sexual assault in the United States (U.S.) military is essential to safeguard the overall well-being of military personnel and support the military to function in alignment with its intended mission and objectives. Valid instruments are needed to accurately and reliably evaluate programming effectiveness. The goal of this research was to psychometrically assess measures used to evaluate the Sexual Communication and Consent (SCC) program within the Air Force Basic Military Training (BMT) context.<h4>Methods</h4>We evaluated four measures used to assess the SCC program implemented at Air Force BMT in 2019-2020: Date Rape Attitudes, Self-Efficacy to Resist Unwanted Advances, Risky and Protective Dating Behaviors, and Bystander Intentions. The analytic sample included 7,126 BMT trainees (74% male). We assessed structural validity with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We used full information maximum likelihood estimation with robust standard errors in Mplus. We refined each scale based on factor analysis results and assessed internal consistency reliability by computing Cronbach's coefficient alpha for each scale in the overall sample, by sex, and by tailored SCC intervention group.<h4>Results</h4>We identified a two-factor structure for the Date Rape Attitudes scale; subscale reliability was moderate within the overall sample and among males, though low among females. We found single-factor structures and excellent reliability for both the Self-Efficacy to Resist Unwanted Advances scale and the Bystander Intentions scale. The Dating Behaviors scale CFA did not confirm the two-factor solution suggested by the EFA, but subscale reliability was acceptable.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This research fills a critical gap in the psychometric literature in military settings. Based on our findings, we recommend approaches for using the finalized scales in future evaluations of sexual assault prevention programming in the U.S. Air Force BMT setting.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317557
spellingShingle Kathryn E L Grimes
Nichole M Scaglione
Marni L Kan
Leah Frerichs
Christopher M Shea
Angela M Stover
Psychometric assessment of scales used to evaluate sexual assault prevention programming in the United States Air Force.
PLoS ONE
title Psychometric assessment of scales used to evaluate sexual assault prevention programming in the United States Air Force.
title_full Psychometric assessment of scales used to evaluate sexual assault prevention programming in the United States Air Force.
title_fullStr Psychometric assessment of scales used to evaluate sexual assault prevention programming in the United States Air Force.
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric assessment of scales used to evaluate sexual assault prevention programming in the United States Air Force.
title_short Psychometric assessment of scales used to evaluate sexual assault prevention programming in the United States Air Force.
title_sort psychometric assessment of scales used to evaluate sexual assault prevention programming in the united states air force
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317557
work_keys_str_mv AT kathrynelgrimes psychometricassessmentofscalesusedtoevaluatesexualassaultpreventionprogrammingintheunitedstatesairforce
AT nicholemscaglione psychometricassessmentofscalesusedtoevaluatesexualassaultpreventionprogrammingintheunitedstatesairforce
AT marnilkan psychometricassessmentofscalesusedtoevaluatesexualassaultpreventionprogrammingintheunitedstatesairforce
AT leahfrerichs psychometricassessmentofscalesusedtoevaluatesexualassaultpreventionprogrammingintheunitedstatesairforce
AT christophermshea psychometricassessmentofscalesusedtoevaluatesexualassaultpreventionprogrammingintheunitedstatesairforce
AT angelamstover psychometricassessmentofscalesusedtoevaluatesexualassaultpreventionprogrammingintheunitedstatesairforce