Impact of Decitabine Conditioning on Allo‐HSCT Outcomes in AML and Intermediate‐to‐High‐Risk MDS Patients in Remission

ABSTRACT Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) remains the sole curative option for myeloid malignancies, though high toxicity from conditioning regimens and complications like graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) limit its success. The potential benefit of incorporat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuling Yu, Wanchuan Zhuang, Shengfa Gao, Tongyu Li, Xiao Yan, Guifang Ouyang, Ping Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-07-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71081
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850067663590522880
author Shuling Yu
Wanchuan Zhuang
Shengfa Gao
Tongyu Li
Xiao Yan
Guifang Ouyang
Ping Zhang
author_facet Shuling Yu
Wanchuan Zhuang
Shengfa Gao
Tongyu Li
Xiao Yan
Guifang Ouyang
Ping Zhang
author_sort Shuling Yu
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) remains the sole curative option for myeloid malignancies, though high toxicity from conditioning regimens and complications like graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) limit its success. The potential benefit of incorporating decitabine (DAC) into conditioning regimens for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and intermediate‐to‐high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients in remission remains unclear. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single‐center study analyzing data from January 2016 to December 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University with a median follow‐up of 45.05 months (range, 1–96 months). Outcomes were compared between patients receiving DAC+HSCT versus HSCT alone, with primary endpoints of 5‐year overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and relapse rate. Secondary analyses examined outcomes by remission status (CR1 vs. others) and age subgroups (< 31.5 years). Immune cell subsets (CD3−CD56+ NK cells) were evaluated for GVHD correlation. Results The DAC+HSCT group exhibited 5‐year OS of 51.9% and PFS of 46.1%, compared to 67% OS and 56.5% PFS in the HSCT‐only group. The 5‐year relapse rate was 16.9% for DAC+HSCT versus 23.2% for HSCT alone. DAC did not significantly improve outcomes in complete remission (CR1) patients but improved OS and PFS in patients under 31.5 years of age. Elevated CD3−CD56+ NK cells in the DAC+HSCT group were associated with higher incidence of severe acute GVHD (aGVHD). Conclusion While DAC conditioning did not provide overall survival benefit for AML/MDS patients undergoing allo‐HSCT, it improved outcomes in younger individuals (< 31.5 years). Higher NK cell proportions may serve as a potential biomarker for early aGVHD intervention, warranting further investigation into risk‐stratified conditioning approaches.
format Article
id doaj-art-e039749b96c64dc09a2482be8e688047
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-7634
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj-art-e039749b96c64dc09a2482be8e6880472025-08-20T02:48:15ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342025-07-011414n/an/a10.1002/cam4.71081Impact of Decitabine Conditioning on Allo‐HSCT Outcomes in AML and Intermediate‐to‐High‐Risk MDS Patients in RemissionShuling Yu0Wanchuan Zhuang1Shengfa Gao2Tongyu Li3Xiao Yan4Guifang Ouyang5Ping Zhang6Department of Hematology The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University Ningbo ChinaDepartment of Hematology Lianyungang Second People's Hospital Lianyungang Jiangsu ChinaDepartment of Hematology The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University Ningbo ChinaDepartment of Hematology The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University Ningbo ChinaDepartment of Hematology The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University Ningbo ChinaDepartment of Hematology The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University Ningbo ChinaDepartment of Hematology The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University Ningbo ChinaABSTRACT Background Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) remains the sole curative option for myeloid malignancies, though high toxicity from conditioning regimens and complications like graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) limit its success. The potential benefit of incorporating decitabine (DAC) into conditioning regimens for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and intermediate‐to‐high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients in remission remains unclear. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single‐center study analyzing data from January 2016 to December 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University with a median follow‐up of 45.05 months (range, 1–96 months). Outcomes were compared between patients receiving DAC+HSCT versus HSCT alone, with primary endpoints of 5‐year overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and relapse rate. Secondary analyses examined outcomes by remission status (CR1 vs. others) and age subgroups (< 31.5 years). Immune cell subsets (CD3−CD56+ NK cells) were evaluated for GVHD correlation. Results The DAC+HSCT group exhibited 5‐year OS of 51.9% and PFS of 46.1%, compared to 67% OS and 56.5% PFS in the HSCT‐only group. The 5‐year relapse rate was 16.9% for DAC+HSCT versus 23.2% for HSCT alone. DAC did not significantly improve outcomes in complete remission (CR1) patients but improved OS and PFS in patients under 31.5 years of age. Elevated CD3−CD56+ NK cells in the DAC+HSCT group were associated with higher incidence of severe acute GVHD (aGVHD). Conclusion While DAC conditioning did not provide overall survival benefit for AML/MDS patients undergoing allo‐HSCT, it improved outcomes in younger individuals (< 31.5 years). Higher NK cell proportions may serve as a potential biomarker for early aGVHD intervention, warranting further investigation into risk‐stratified conditioning approaches.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71081allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationAMLdecitabinegraft‐versus‐host diseaseMDS
spellingShingle Shuling Yu
Wanchuan Zhuang
Shengfa Gao
Tongyu Li
Xiao Yan
Guifang Ouyang
Ping Zhang
Impact of Decitabine Conditioning on Allo‐HSCT Outcomes in AML and Intermediate‐to‐High‐Risk MDS Patients in Remission
Cancer Medicine
allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
AML
decitabine
graft‐versus‐host disease
MDS
title Impact of Decitabine Conditioning on Allo‐HSCT Outcomes in AML and Intermediate‐to‐High‐Risk MDS Patients in Remission
title_full Impact of Decitabine Conditioning on Allo‐HSCT Outcomes in AML and Intermediate‐to‐High‐Risk MDS Patients in Remission
title_fullStr Impact of Decitabine Conditioning on Allo‐HSCT Outcomes in AML and Intermediate‐to‐High‐Risk MDS Patients in Remission
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Decitabine Conditioning on Allo‐HSCT Outcomes in AML and Intermediate‐to‐High‐Risk MDS Patients in Remission
title_short Impact of Decitabine Conditioning on Allo‐HSCT Outcomes in AML and Intermediate‐to‐High‐Risk MDS Patients in Remission
title_sort impact of decitabine conditioning on allo hsct outcomes in aml and intermediate to high risk mds patients in remission
topic allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
AML
decitabine
graft‐versus‐host disease
MDS
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71081
work_keys_str_mv AT shulingyu impactofdecitabineconditioningonallohsctoutcomesinamlandintermediatetohighriskmdspatientsinremission
AT wanchuanzhuang impactofdecitabineconditioningonallohsctoutcomesinamlandintermediatetohighriskmdspatientsinremission
AT shengfagao impactofdecitabineconditioningonallohsctoutcomesinamlandintermediatetohighriskmdspatientsinremission
AT tongyuli impactofdecitabineconditioningonallohsctoutcomesinamlandintermediatetohighriskmdspatientsinremission
AT xiaoyan impactofdecitabineconditioningonallohsctoutcomesinamlandintermediatetohighriskmdspatientsinremission
AT guifangouyang impactofdecitabineconditioningonallohsctoutcomesinamlandintermediatetohighriskmdspatientsinremission
AT pingzhang impactofdecitabineconditioningonallohsctoutcomesinamlandintermediatetohighriskmdspatientsinremission