Value of microwave soil moisture and thermal-infrared evapotranspiration retrievals for the mapping of irrigation coverage

To better monitor global water resources, and understand how they will vary in the future, it is critical to track the extent and intensity of irrigated agriculture. Within the past decade, there has been increased interest in the satellite-based detection of anomalous soil moisture (SM) and/or evap...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wade T. Crow, Martha C. Anderson, John M. Volk, Andreas Colliander
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-09-01
Series:International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004200
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849390230893756416
author Wade T. Crow
Martha C. Anderson
John M. Volk
Andreas Colliander
author_facet Wade T. Crow
Martha C. Anderson
John M. Volk
Andreas Colliander
author_sort Wade T. Crow
collection DOAJ
description To better monitor global water resources, and understand how they will vary in the future, it is critical to track the extent and intensity of irrigated agriculture. Within the past decade, there has been increased interest in the satellite-based detection of anomalous soil moisture (SM) and/or evapotranspiration (ET) signals associated with irrigation. However, little comparative information is available concerning the relative merits of available ET versus SM satellite products for this purpose. Such uncertainty has hampered the development of optimal monitoring strategies that appropriately integrate information acquired across a range of remote sensing resources. Here, using relatively more mature irrigation products derived from a combination of ground data and visible/near-infrared remote sensing as a reference, we compare the skill of microwave (MW) SM and thermal-infrared (TIR) ET satellite products for mapping coarse-scale (36-km) spatial variations in the proportion of land irrigated across the conterminous United States. Results suggest that, while spatial mapping skill exists in both products, the irrigation signal in satellite-based ET products is stronger, and easier to interpret, than the analogous signal in SM products. Since MW-based SM and TIR-based ET products appear to possess approximately equal spatial precision (i.e., spatial correlations with respect to true SM and ET, respectively), this difference is attributed to the stronger impact of irrigation on spatial ET patterns versus surface SM.Plain Language Summary: To better monitor global water resources, and understand how they will vary in the future, it is important to track the extent and intensity of irrigated agriculture. To do this, different satellite-based methods have been proposed to track irrigation from space. Unfortunately, there has been little comparison of these methods, and it is unclear which ones work best. Here, we compare methods for monitoring irrigation based on two different remote sensing techniques: thermal infrared and passive microwave. While information derived from both types of remote sensing is useful for irrigation monitoring, results show that thermal-infrared remote sensing contains more information. This insight will help improve future efforts to globally monitor irrigation using satellite-based sensors.
format Article
id doaj-art-e033443887d54ff59292f9f727511fa2
institution Kabale University
issn 1569-8432
language English
publishDate 2025-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation
spelling doaj-art-e033443887d54ff59292f9f727511fa22025-08-20T03:41:43ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation1569-84322025-09-0114310477310.1016/j.jag.2025.104773Value of microwave soil moisture and thermal-infrared evapotranspiration retrievals for the mapping of irrigation coverageWade T. Crow0Martha C. Anderson1John M. Volk2Andreas Colliander3USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA; Corresponding author at: USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Rm. 110, Blg. 007, BARC-W, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.USDA ARS Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USADesert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91011, USATo better monitor global water resources, and understand how they will vary in the future, it is critical to track the extent and intensity of irrigated agriculture. Within the past decade, there has been increased interest in the satellite-based detection of anomalous soil moisture (SM) and/or evapotranspiration (ET) signals associated with irrigation. However, little comparative information is available concerning the relative merits of available ET versus SM satellite products for this purpose. Such uncertainty has hampered the development of optimal monitoring strategies that appropriately integrate information acquired across a range of remote sensing resources. Here, using relatively more mature irrigation products derived from a combination of ground data and visible/near-infrared remote sensing as a reference, we compare the skill of microwave (MW) SM and thermal-infrared (TIR) ET satellite products for mapping coarse-scale (36-km) spatial variations in the proportion of land irrigated across the conterminous United States. Results suggest that, while spatial mapping skill exists in both products, the irrigation signal in satellite-based ET products is stronger, and easier to interpret, than the analogous signal in SM products. Since MW-based SM and TIR-based ET products appear to possess approximately equal spatial precision (i.e., spatial correlations with respect to true SM and ET, respectively), this difference is attributed to the stronger impact of irrigation on spatial ET patterns versus surface SM.Plain Language Summary: To better monitor global water resources, and understand how they will vary in the future, it is important to track the extent and intensity of irrigated agriculture. To do this, different satellite-based methods have been proposed to track irrigation from space. Unfortunately, there has been little comparison of these methods, and it is unclear which ones work best. Here, we compare methods for monitoring irrigation based on two different remote sensing techniques: thermal infrared and passive microwave. While information derived from both types of remote sensing is useful for irrigation monitoring, results show that thermal-infrared remote sensing contains more information. This insight will help improve future efforts to globally monitor irrigation using satellite-based sensors.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004200Thermal infraredMicrowaveIrrigationSoil moistureAnd evapotranspiration
spellingShingle Wade T. Crow
Martha C. Anderson
John M. Volk
Andreas Colliander
Value of microwave soil moisture and thermal-infrared evapotranspiration retrievals for the mapping of irrigation coverage
International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation
Thermal infrared
Microwave
Irrigation
Soil moisture
And evapotranspiration
title Value of microwave soil moisture and thermal-infrared evapotranspiration retrievals for the mapping of irrigation coverage
title_full Value of microwave soil moisture and thermal-infrared evapotranspiration retrievals for the mapping of irrigation coverage
title_fullStr Value of microwave soil moisture and thermal-infrared evapotranspiration retrievals for the mapping of irrigation coverage
title_full_unstemmed Value of microwave soil moisture and thermal-infrared evapotranspiration retrievals for the mapping of irrigation coverage
title_short Value of microwave soil moisture and thermal-infrared evapotranspiration retrievals for the mapping of irrigation coverage
title_sort value of microwave soil moisture and thermal infrared evapotranspiration retrievals for the mapping of irrigation coverage
topic Thermal infrared
Microwave
Irrigation
Soil moisture
And evapotranspiration
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004200
work_keys_str_mv AT wadetcrow valueofmicrowavesoilmoistureandthermalinfraredevapotranspirationretrievalsforthemappingofirrigationcoverage
AT marthacanderson valueofmicrowavesoilmoistureandthermalinfraredevapotranspirationretrievalsforthemappingofirrigationcoverage
AT johnmvolk valueofmicrowavesoilmoistureandthermalinfraredevapotranspirationretrievalsforthemappingofirrigationcoverage
AT andreascolliander valueofmicrowavesoilmoistureandthermalinfraredevapotranspirationretrievalsforthemappingofirrigationcoverage