Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Traditional Lead Aprons versus Newer Generation Lead-free Aprons in Radiation Protection
The comparative effectiveness of traditional lead aprons versus newer generation lead-free alternatives in radiation protection is a critical area of investigation in medical safety. While lead aprons have long been the standard, concerns over weight and mobility have spurred interest in lead-free o...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Physics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jmp.jmp_152_24 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849768989528424448 |
|---|---|
| author | Sri Hari Prasath Gurumurthi Vasanthaprabha Rajasekar |
| author_facet | Sri Hari Prasath Gurumurthi Vasanthaprabha Rajasekar |
| author_sort | Sri Hari Prasath Gurumurthi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The comparative effectiveness of traditional lead aprons versus newer generation lead-free alternatives in radiation protection is a critical area of investigation in medical safety. While lead aprons have long been the standard, concerns over weight and mobility have spurred interest in lead-free options, which incorporate materials such as antimony, bismuth, and barium sulfate. Understanding the relative performance of these apron types is essential for optimizing radiation protection protocols in medical settings. Relevant studies were identified through electronic database searches, with inclusion criteria focusing on comparative evaluations of apron types in terms of radiation shielding effectiveness and durability. Data extraction and risk of bias were performed to analyze key findings across the selected studies. Analysis of the included eleven studies revealed promising results for lead-free aprons, demonstrating comparable radiation protection to traditional lead aprons. In addition, thinner lead-free aprons were proven to be adequate for shielding while concerns related to weight and mobility. The systematic review highlights the evolving landscape of radiation protection in medical settings, with newer-generation lead-free aprons presenting promising alternatives to traditional lead aprons. In addition, shields composed of combined metals demonstrated more substantial attenuation and dose reduction in comparison to single-metal shields. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e02dfae70b7a4a9197dec86ad79c6c2c |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 0971-6203 1998-3913 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Medical Physics |
| spelling | doaj-art-e02dfae70b7a4a9197dec86ad79c6c2c2025-08-20T03:03:37ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Medical Physics0971-62031998-39132025-01-015011710.4103/jmp.jmp_152_24Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Traditional Lead Aprons versus Newer Generation Lead-free Aprons in Radiation ProtectionSri Hari Prasath GurumurthiVasanthaprabha RajasekarThe comparative effectiveness of traditional lead aprons versus newer generation lead-free alternatives in radiation protection is a critical area of investigation in medical safety. While lead aprons have long been the standard, concerns over weight and mobility have spurred interest in lead-free options, which incorporate materials such as antimony, bismuth, and barium sulfate. Understanding the relative performance of these apron types is essential for optimizing radiation protection protocols in medical settings. Relevant studies were identified through electronic database searches, with inclusion criteria focusing on comparative evaluations of apron types in terms of radiation shielding effectiveness and durability. Data extraction and risk of bias were performed to analyze key findings across the selected studies. Analysis of the included eleven studies revealed promising results for lead-free aprons, demonstrating comparable radiation protection to traditional lead aprons. In addition, thinner lead-free aprons were proven to be adequate for shielding while concerns related to weight and mobility. The systematic review highlights the evolving landscape of radiation protection in medical settings, with newer-generation lead-free aprons presenting promising alternatives to traditional lead aprons. In addition, shields composed of combined metals demonstrated more substantial attenuation and dose reduction in comparison to single-metal shields.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jmp.jmp_152_24apronsefficacylead-freeradiationsafetytransmission |
| spellingShingle | Sri Hari Prasath Gurumurthi Vasanthaprabha Rajasekar Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Traditional Lead Aprons versus Newer Generation Lead-free Aprons in Radiation Protection Journal of Medical Physics aprons efficacy lead-free radiation safety transmission |
| title | Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Traditional Lead Aprons versus Newer Generation Lead-free Aprons in Radiation Protection |
| title_full | Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Traditional Lead Aprons versus Newer Generation Lead-free Aprons in Radiation Protection |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Traditional Lead Aprons versus Newer Generation Lead-free Aprons in Radiation Protection |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Traditional Lead Aprons versus Newer Generation Lead-free Aprons in Radiation Protection |
| title_short | Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness of Traditional Lead Aprons versus Newer Generation Lead-free Aprons in Radiation Protection |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of effectiveness of traditional lead aprons versus newer generation lead free aprons in radiation protection |
| topic | aprons efficacy lead-free radiation safety transmission |
| url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jmp.jmp_152_24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT srihariprasathgurumurthi comparativeanalysisofeffectivenessoftraditionalleadapronsversusnewergenerationleadfreeapronsinradiationprotection AT vasanthaprabharajasekar comparativeanalysisofeffectivenessoftraditionalleadapronsversusnewergenerationleadfreeapronsinradiationprotection |