A Randomized, Double‐Blind, 2‐Treatment, 2‐Period, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of 60 IU/Kg of Abcertin and Cerezyme in Healthy Volunteers Following a Single Intravenous Administration

ABSTRACT Background Imiglucerase (Cerezyme; Sanofi, Paris, France), an analogue of β‐glucocerebrosidase produced by recombinant DNA technology, has been a safe and effective treatment for Gaucher disease (GD) for over 25 years. A new imiglucerase, Abcertin (Seongnam‐si, Gyeonggi‐do, Republic of Kore...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eungu Kang, Dohyung Kim, Soojin Hwang, Charlotte Lemech, Jessica Wharton, Yongyoon Lee, Han Wook Yoo, Beom Hee Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-06-01
Series:Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.70111
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849434925616332800
author Eungu Kang
Dohyung Kim
Soojin Hwang
Charlotte Lemech
Jessica Wharton
Yongyoon Lee
Han Wook Yoo
Beom Hee Lee
author_facet Eungu Kang
Dohyung Kim
Soojin Hwang
Charlotte Lemech
Jessica Wharton
Yongyoon Lee
Han Wook Yoo
Beom Hee Lee
author_sort Eungu Kang
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background Imiglucerase (Cerezyme; Sanofi, Paris, France), an analogue of β‐glucocerebrosidase produced by recombinant DNA technology, has been a safe and effective treatment for Gaucher disease (GD) for over 25 years. A new imiglucerase, Abcertin (Seongnam‐si, Gyeonggi‐do, Republic of Korea) has shown a similar safety and efficacy profile in previous clinical studies. This study compared the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability to EU‐sourced Cerezyme following a single 60 IU/kg dose. Methods This phase 1, single‐center, randomized, double‐blind, two‐way crossover study enrolled 36 healthy volunteers aged 18–45 years. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either Abcertin or Cerezyme in a predetermined sequence. Results Abcertin reached peak plasma concentrations at a median tmax of 61 min (range: 40–121 min). The mean Cmax, AUC0–last, and AUC0–inf were 115.4 mU/mL, 12,190 min·mU/mL, and 12,210 min mU/mL, respectively, indicating bioequivalence to Cerezyme. The mean t½, CL, and Vz were 6.88 min, 376.7 mL/min, and 3.62 L, respectively, and were comparable between the two treatments. One participant in the Cerezyme group developed anti‐drug antibodies, which were non‐neutralizing A total of 24 subjects experienced treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAE was headache (3 in the Abcertin group and 5 in the Cerezyme group), followed by general disorders and administration site condition (3 in Abcertin group and 5 in Cerezyme group). Two participants in the Cerezyme sequence experienced severe TEAEs: one had a urinary tract infection, and the other developed urticaria, which leading to study withdrawal. Conclusion Abcertin demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence to Cerezyme, with a comparable safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability profile. These findings support its potential as an affordable biosimilar for GD treatment.
format Article
id doaj-art-dfe70de07c0645fca3b6dbe0903768a2
institution Kabale University
issn 2324-9269
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
spelling doaj-art-dfe70de07c0645fca3b6dbe0903768a22025-08-20T03:26:29ZengWileyMolecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine2324-92692025-06-01136n/an/a10.1002/mgg3.70111A Randomized, Double‐Blind, 2‐Treatment, 2‐Period, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of 60 IU/Kg of Abcertin and Cerezyme in Healthy Volunteers Following a Single Intravenous AdministrationEungu Kang0Dohyung Kim1Soojin Hwang2Charlotte Lemech3Jessica Wharton4Yongyoon Lee5Han Wook Yoo6Beom Hee Lee7Department of Pediatrics Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine Ansan Republic of KoreaDepartment of Pediatrics Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaDepartment of Pediatrics Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaScientia Clinical Research (SCR) Randwick New South Wales AustraliaScientia Clinical Research (SCR) Randwick New South Wales AustraliaISU ABXIS Co., Ltd. Seongnam‐si Gyeonggi‐do Republic of KoreaDepartment of Pediatrics CHA University School of Medicine, Bundang CHA Medical Center Seongnam Republic of KoreaDepartment of Pediatrics Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul Republic of KoreaABSTRACT Background Imiglucerase (Cerezyme; Sanofi, Paris, France), an analogue of β‐glucocerebrosidase produced by recombinant DNA technology, has been a safe and effective treatment for Gaucher disease (GD) for over 25 years. A new imiglucerase, Abcertin (Seongnam‐si, Gyeonggi‐do, Republic of Korea) has shown a similar safety and efficacy profile in previous clinical studies. This study compared the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability to EU‐sourced Cerezyme following a single 60 IU/kg dose. Methods This phase 1, single‐center, randomized, double‐blind, two‐way crossover study enrolled 36 healthy volunteers aged 18–45 years. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either Abcertin or Cerezyme in a predetermined sequence. Results Abcertin reached peak plasma concentrations at a median tmax of 61 min (range: 40–121 min). The mean Cmax, AUC0–last, and AUC0–inf were 115.4 mU/mL, 12,190 min·mU/mL, and 12,210 min mU/mL, respectively, indicating bioequivalence to Cerezyme. The mean t½, CL, and Vz were 6.88 min, 376.7 mL/min, and 3.62 L, respectively, and were comparable between the two treatments. One participant in the Cerezyme group developed anti‐drug antibodies, which were non‐neutralizing A total of 24 subjects experienced treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAE was headache (3 in the Abcertin group and 5 in the Cerezyme group), followed by general disorders and administration site condition (3 in Abcertin group and 5 in Cerezyme group). Two participants in the Cerezyme sequence experienced severe TEAEs: one had a urinary tract infection, and the other developed urticaria, which leading to study withdrawal. Conclusion Abcertin demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence to Cerezyme, with a comparable safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability profile. These findings support its potential as an affordable biosimilar for GD treatment.https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.70111biosimilarenzyme replacement therapyGaucher diseasepharmacokineticssafety
spellingShingle Eungu Kang
Dohyung Kim
Soojin Hwang
Charlotte Lemech
Jessica Wharton
Yongyoon Lee
Han Wook Yoo
Beom Hee Lee
A Randomized, Double‐Blind, 2‐Treatment, 2‐Period, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of 60 IU/Kg of Abcertin and Cerezyme in Healthy Volunteers Following a Single Intravenous Administration
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
biosimilar
enzyme replacement therapy
Gaucher disease
pharmacokinetics
safety
title A Randomized, Double‐Blind, 2‐Treatment, 2‐Period, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of 60 IU/Kg of Abcertin and Cerezyme in Healthy Volunteers Following a Single Intravenous Administration
title_full A Randomized, Double‐Blind, 2‐Treatment, 2‐Period, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of 60 IU/Kg of Abcertin and Cerezyme in Healthy Volunteers Following a Single Intravenous Administration
title_fullStr A Randomized, Double‐Blind, 2‐Treatment, 2‐Period, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of 60 IU/Kg of Abcertin and Cerezyme in Healthy Volunteers Following a Single Intravenous Administration
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized, Double‐Blind, 2‐Treatment, 2‐Period, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of 60 IU/Kg of Abcertin and Cerezyme in Healthy Volunteers Following a Single Intravenous Administration
title_short A Randomized, Double‐Blind, 2‐Treatment, 2‐Period, Crossover Phase 1 Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of 60 IU/Kg of Abcertin and Cerezyme in Healthy Volunteers Following a Single Intravenous Administration
title_sort randomized double blind 2 treatment 2 period crossover phase 1 study to compare the pharmacokinetics safety and tolerability of 60 iu kg of abcertin and cerezyme in healthy volunteers following a single intravenous administration
topic biosimilar
enzyme replacement therapy
Gaucher disease
pharmacokinetics
safety
url https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.70111
work_keys_str_mv AT eungukang arandomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT dohyungkim arandomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT soojinhwang arandomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT charlottelemech arandomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT jessicawharton arandomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT yongyoonlee arandomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT hanwookyoo arandomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT beomheelee arandomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT eungukang randomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT dohyungkim randomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT soojinhwang randomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT charlottelemech randomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT jessicawharton randomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT yongyoonlee randomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT hanwookyoo randomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration
AT beomheelee randomizeddoubleblind2treatment2periodcrossoverphase1studytocomparethepharmacokineticssafetyandtolerabilityof60iukgofabcertinandcerezymeinhealthyvolunteersfollowingasingleintravenousadministration