Instynkt ceremonialny u antropologa, czyli Wittgenstein jako religioznawca

The article deals with one of the most underestimated aspects of Wittgenstein’s thought, namely his remarks on the anthropology of religion. On the one hand, it serves as a reminder of their importance – extraordinary compared with their concisen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Urszula Idziak-Smoczyńska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jagiellonian University 2024-12-01
Series:Studia Religiologica
Online Access: https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/studia-religiologica/artykul/instynkt-ceremonialny-u-antropologa-czyli-wittgenstein-jako-religioznawca
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850176172062670848
author Urszula Idziak-Smoczyńska
author_facet Urszula Idziak-Smoczyńska
author_sort Urszula Idziak-Smoczyńska
collection DOAJ
description The article deals with one of the most underestimated aspects of Wittgenstein’s thought, namely his remarks on the anthropology of religion. On the one hand, it serves as a reminder of their importance – extraordinary compared with their conciseness – and of what, beyond Wittgenstein’s criticism of Frazer, constituted his positive message, which is only nowadays fully appreciated (Westergaard, De Lara, Nancy, etc.). On the other hand, the article shows, in one example, how the remarks (made by R. Rhees) had an impact (perhaps negative) on their reception. The opportunity offered by contemporary experts in the humanities allows us to observe the evolution of Wittgenstein’s reflection in its original context and realize its inherent potential.
format Article
id doaj-art-dfe012b6f3334e89a9eab49c00b0cf01
institution OA Journals
issn 0137-2432
2084-4077
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Jagiellonian University
record_format Article
series Studia Religiologica
spelling doaj-art-dfe012b6f3334e89a9eab49c00b0cf012025-08-20T02:19:18ZengJagiellonian UniversityStudia Religiologica0137-24322084-40772024-12-012024111810.4467/20844077SR.24.001.20742Instynkt ceremonialny u antropologa, czyli Wittgenstein jako religioznawcaUrszula Idziak-Smoczyńska 0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-5264 Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie The article deals with one of the most underestimated aspects of Wittgenstein’s thought, namely his remarks on the anthropology of religion. On the one hand, it serves as a reminder of their importance – extraordinary compared with their conciseness – and of what, beyond Wittgenstein’s criticism of Frazer, constituted his positive message, which is only nowadays fully appreciated (Westergaard, De Lara, Nancy, etc.). On the other hand, the article shows, in one example, how the remarks (made by R. Rhees) had an impact (perhaps negative) on their reception. The opportunity offered by contemporary experts in the humanities allows us to observe the evolution of Wittgenstein’s reflection in its original context and realize its inherent potential. https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/studia-religiologica/artykul/instynkt-ceremonialny-u-antropologa-czyli-wittgenstein-jako-religioznawca
spellingShingle Urszula Idziak-Smoczyńska
Instynkt ceremonialny u antropologa, czyli Wittgenstein jako religioznawca
Studia Religiologica
title Instynkt ceremonialny u antropologa, czyli Wittgenstein jako religioznawca
title_full Instynkt ceremonialny u antropologa, czyli Wittgenstein jako religioznawca
title_fullStr Instynkt ceremonialny u antropologa, czyli Wittgenstein jako religioznawca
title_full_unstemmed Instynkt ceremonialny u antropologa, czyli Wittgenstein jako religioznawca
title_short Instynkt ceremonialny u antropologa, czyli Wittgenstein jako religioznawca
title_sort instynkt ceremonialny u antropologa czyli wittgenstein jako religioznawca
url https://ejournals.eu/czasopismo/studia-religiologica/artykul/instynkt-ceremonialny-u-antropologa-czyli-wittgenstein-jako-religioznawca
work_keys_str_mv AT urszulaidziaksmoczynska instynktceremonialnyuantropologaczyliwittgensteinjakoreligioznawca