Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Objective To summarize the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) and to construct clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms using existing databases. Methods Clinical prognostic models were developed using the Surveillance, Epi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xuhui Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2024-12-01
Series:Discover Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01669-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846112448848855040
author Xuhui Wang
author_facet Xuhui Wang
author_sort Xuhui Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To summarize the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) and to construct clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms using existing databases. Methods Clinical prognostic models were developed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, while molecular prognostic models were constructed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Cox regression and LASSO regression were employed to identify clinicopathological features and molecular markers related to prognosis. The accuracy of the prognostic models was assessed using ROC curves, C-index, decision curve analysis (DCA) curves, and calibration plots. Results In the 2004–2015 SEER cohort, Cox regression analysis revealed that age, grade, AJCC stage, N stage, M stage, and surgery were independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in pRCC patients. ROC curves, C-index, and DCA curves indicated that the prognostic nomogram based on clinical independent predictors had better predictive ability than TNM staging and SEER staging. Additionally, in the TCGA cohort, M stage, clinical stage, and the molecular markers IDO1 and PLK1 were identified as independent risk factors. The prognostic nomogram based on molecular independent risk factors effectively predicted the 3-year and 5-year OS and CSS for pRCC patients. Conclusions The clinical and molecular nomograms constructed in this study provide robust predictive tools for individualized prognosis in pRCC patients, offering better accuracy than traditional staging systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-dfd8d2ad0c9b4bb8b627d73c7cf8af49
institution Kabale University
issn 2730-6011
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Springer
record_format Article
series Discover Oncology
spelling doaj-art-dfd8d2ad0c9b4bb8b627d73c7cf8af492024-12-22T12:35:13ZengSpringerDiscover Oncology2730-60112024-12-0115112010.1007/s12672-024-01669-8Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinomaXuhui Wang0Department of Urology, The Affiliated People’s Hospital of Ningbo UniversityAbstract Objective To summarize the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) and to construct clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms using existing databases. Methods Clinical prognostic models were developed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, while molecular prognostic models were constructed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Cox regression and LASSO regression were employed to identify clinicopathological features and molecular markers related to prognosis. The accuracy of the prognostic models was assessed using ROC curves, C-index, decision curve analysis (DCA) curves, and calibration plots. Results In the 2004–2015 SEER cohort, Cox regression analysis revealed that age, grade, AJCC stage, N stage, M stage, and surgery were independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in pRCC patients. ROC curves, C-index, and DCA curves indicated that the prognostic nomogram based on clinical independent predictors had better predictive ability than TNM staging and SEER staging. Additionally, in the TCGA cohort, M stage, clinical stage, and the molecular markers IDO1 and PLK1 were identified as independent risk factors. The prognostic nomogram based on molecular independent risk factors effectively predicted the 3-year and 5-year OS and CSS for pRCC patients. Conclusions The clinical and molecular nomograms constructed in this study provide robust predictive tools for individualized prognosis in pRCC patients, offering better accuracy than traditional staging systems.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01669-8Papillary renal cell carcinomaNomogramSEERTCGA
spellingShingle Xuhui Wang
Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma
Discover Oncology
Papillary renal cell carcinoma
Nomogram
SEER
TCGA
title Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_full Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_short Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma
title_sort clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma
topic Papillary renal cell carcinoma
Nomogram
SEER
TCGA
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01669-8
work_keys_str_mv AT xuhuiwang clinicalandmolecularprognosticnomogramsforpatientswithpapillaryrenalcellcarcinoma