Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock Sources

The effectiveness of different soil tests in assessing soil phosphorus (P) in soils amended with phosphate rocks (PRs) is uncertain. We evaluated the effects of triple superphosphate (TSP) and PRs on extractable P by conventional soil tests (Mehlich 3 [Meh3] and Bray-1 [B1]) and a nonconventional te...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: E. W. Gikonyo, A. R. Zaharah, M. M. Hanafi, A. R. Anuar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2010.174
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849472138889658368
author E. W. Gikonyo
A. R. Zaharah
M. M. Hanafi
A. R. Anuar
author_facet E. W. Gikonyo
A. R. Zaharah
M. M. Hanafi
A. R. Anuar
author_sort E. W. Gikonyo
collection DOAJ
description The effectiveness of different soil tests in assessing soil phosphorus (P) in soils amended with phosphate rocks (PRs) is uncertain. We evaluated the effects of triple superphosphate (TSP) and PRs on extractable P by conventional soil tests (Mehlich 3 [Meh3] and Bray-1 [B1]) and a nonconventional test (iron oxide–impregnated paper, strip). Extracted amounts of P were in the order: Meh3 >B1 > strip. All the tests were significantly correlated (p = 0.001). Acidic reagents extracted more P from TSP than PRs, while the strip removed equal amounts from the two sources. The P removed by the three tests was related significantly to dry matter yield (DMY), but only in the first harvest, except for B1. Established critical P levels (CPLs) differed for TSP and PRs. In PR-fertilized soils, CPLs were 27, 17, and 12 mg P kg-1soil for Meh3, B1, and strip, respectively, and 42, 31, and 12 mg P kg-1 soil, respectively, in TSP-fertilized soils. Thus, the strip resulted in a common CPL for TSP and PRs (12 mg P kg-1 soil). This method can be used effectively in soils where integrated nutrient sources have been used, but there is need to establish CPLs for different crops. For cost-effective fertilizer P recommendations based on conventional soil tests, there is a need to conduct separate calibrations for TSP- and PR-fertilized soils.
format Article
id doaj-art-dfc3ba6cc1c04ff78d9624bb09ca2348
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-dfc3ba6cc1c04ff78d9624bb09ca23482025-08-20T03:24:36ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2010-01-01101679169310.1100/tsw.2010.174Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock SourcesE. W. Gikonyo0A. R. Zaharah1M. M. Hanafi2A. R. Anuar3Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MalaysiaDepartment of Land Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MalaysiaInstitute of Tropical Agriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MalaysiaDepartment of Land Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MalaysiaThe effectiveness of different soil tests in assessing soil phosphorus (P) in soils amended with phosphate rocks (PRs) is uncertain. We evaluated the effects of triple superphosphate (TSP) and PRs on extractable P by conventional soil tests (Mehlich 3 [Meh3] and Bray-1 [B1]) and a nonconventional test (iron oxide–impregnated paper, strip). Extracted amounts of P were in the order: Meh3 >B1 > strip. All the tests were significantly correlated (p = 0.001). Acidic reagents extracted more P from TSP than PRs, while the strip removed equal amounts from the two sources. The P removed by the three tests was related significantly to dry matter yield (DMY), but only in the first harvest, except for B1. Established critical P levels (CPLs) differed for TSP and PRs. In PR-fertilized soils, CPLs were 27, 17, and 12 mg P kg-1soil for Meh3, B1, and strip, respectively, and 42, 31, and 12 mg P kg-1 soil, respectively, in TSP-fertilized soils. Thus, the strip resulted in a common CPL for TSP and PRs (12 mg P kg-1 soil). This method can be used effectively in soils where integrated nutrient sources have been used, but there is need to establish CPLs for different crops. For cost-effective fertilizer P recommendations based on conventional soil tests, there is a need to conduct separate calibrations for TSP- and PR-fertilized soils.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2010.174
spellingShingle E. W. Gikonyo
A. R. Zaharah
M. M. Hanafi
A. R. Anuar
Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock Sources
The Scientific World Journal
title Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock Sources
title_full Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock Sources
title_fullStr Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock Sources
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock Sources
title_short Comparison of Soil Phosphorus Tests for Assessing Plant Availability of Phosphorus in an Ultisol Amended with Water-Soluble and Phosphate Rock Sources
title_sort comparison of soil phosphorus tests for assessing plant availability of phosphorus in an ultisol amended with water soluble and phosphate rock sources
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2010.174
work_keys_str_mv AT ewgikonyo comparisonofsoilphosphorustestsforassessingplantavailabilityofphosphorusinanultisolamendedwithwatersolubleandphosphaterocksources
AT arzaharah comparisonofsoilphosphorustestsforassessingplantavailabilityofphosphorusinanultisolamendedwithwatersolubleandphosphaterocksources
AT mmhanafi comparisonofsoilphosphorustestsforassessingplantavailabilityofphosphorusinanultisolamendedwithwatersolubleandphosphaterocksources
AT aranuar comparisonofsoilphosphorustestsforassessingplantavailabilityofphosphorusinanultisolamendedwithwatersolubleandphosphaterocksources