Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature Review

Usman K Hayat,1,* Haaris A Shiwani,1,* Danyal Memon,2 Andrew Walkden1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK; 2Department of Ophthalmology, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland*These authors contributed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hayat UK, Shiwani HA, Memon D, Walkden A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2025-07-01
Series:Clinical Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/intracorneal-ring-segments-in-keratoconus-a-narrative-literature-revie-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850113450609475584
author Hayat UK
Shiwani HA
Memon D
Walkden A
author_facet Hayat UK
Shiwani HA
Memon D
Walkden A
author_sort Hayat UK
collection DOAJ
description Usman K Hayat,1,* Haaris A Shiwani,1,* Danyal Memon,2 Andrew Walkden1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK; 2Department of Ophthalmology, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Usman K Hayat, Department of Ophthalmology, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK, Tel +441612761234, Email Usman.Hayat@mft.nhs.ukBackground: Keratoconus is a bilateral, non-inflammatory corneal ectasia characterized by progressive thinning and conical protrusion, leading to irregular astigmatism, usually in association with high myopia. Visual rehabilitation options include corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL), rigid gas permeable contact lenses, intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), phakic intraocular lenses, and corneal transplantation. ICRS are synthetic, biocompatible implants or allogenic corneal tissue, designed to reduce corneal curvature and optimize the refractive profiles. Initially used in 1978 to treat myopia, their role in keratoconus was established in 2000. This review explores ICRS types, surgical techniques, and emerging developments.Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed. A total of 117 peer-reviewed manuscripts, including review articles, randomized controlled trials, case series, and reports, were analysed. Reference lists of publications were also reviewed.Results: ICRS types include MyoRings, KeraRings, Ferrara Rings, and Intacs, each with unique design characteristics and implantation methods. Corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments represent the latest innovation in ICRS. Femtosecond laser-assisted tunnel creation offers improved control over stromal depth and uniformity, reducing complications compared to mechanical dissection. Studies indicate slight corneal stiffening post-ICRS implantation, with no significant changes in intraocular pressure. Topographic changes post-ICRS show significant corneal flattening and reduction in astigmatism. Complications include epithelial defects, segment migration, and keratitis, but long-term follow-up reveals low rates of serious adverse events.Conclusion: ICRS provide an effective option for enhancing vision in select keratoconus patients, ultimately lowering the chances of requiring a corneal transplant. They are of particular use in those intolerant to contact lenses and without central corneal scarring. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes. Combining ICRS with other procedures like CXL may enhance outcomes, though careful patient selection is crucial.Keywords: Intracorneal ring segments, keratoconus
format Article
id doaj-art-dfa96965dd5d4cd6a4b72fe552997f87
institution OA Journals
issn 1177-5483
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Clinical Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-dfa96965dd5d4cd6a4b72fe552997f872025-08-20T02:37:09ZengDove Medical PressClinical Ophthalmology1177-54832025-07-01Volume 19Issue 122492257104708Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature ReviewHayat UK0Shiwani HA1Memon D2Walkden A3Department of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyDepartment of OphthalmologyUsman K Hayat,1,* Haaris A Shiwani,1,* Danyal Memon,2 Andrew Walkden1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK; 2Department of Ophthalmology, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Usman K Hayat, Department of Ophthalmology, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK, Tel +441612761234, Email Usman.Hayat@mft.nhs.ukBackground: Keratoconus is a bilateral, non-inflammatory corneal ectasia characterized by progressive thinning and conical protrusion, leading to irregular astigmatism, usually in association with high myopia. Visual rehabilitation options include corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL), rigid gas permeable contact lenses, intracorneal ring segments (ICRS), phakic intraocular lenses, and corneal transplantation. ICRS are synthetic, biocompatible implants or allogenic corneal tissue, designed to reduce corneal curvature and optimize the refractive profiles. Initially used in 1978 to treat myopia, their role in keratoconus was established in 2000. This review explores ICRS types, surgical techniques, and emerging developments.Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed. A total of 117 peer-reviewed manuscripts, including review articles, randomized controlled trials, case series, and reports, were analysed. Reference lists of publications were also reviewed.Results: ICRS types include MyoRings, KeraRings, Ferrara Rings, and Intacs, each with unique design characteristics and implantation methods. Corneal allogenic intrastromal ring segments represent the latest innovation in ICRS. Femtosecond laser-assisted tunnel creation offers improved control over stromal depth and uniformity, reducing complications compared to mechanical dissection. Studies indicate slight corneal stiffening post-ICRS implantation, with no significant changes in intraocular pressure. Topographic changes post-ICRS show significant corneal flattening and reduction in astigmatism. Complications include epithelial defects, segment migration, and keratitis, but long-term follow-up reveals low rates of serious adverse events.Conclusion: ICRS provide an effective option for enhancing vision in select keratoconus patients, ultimately lowering the chances of requiring a corneal transplant. They are of particular use in those intolerant to contact lenses and without central corneal scarring. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes. Combining ICRS with other procedures like CXL may enhance outcomes, though careful patient selection is crucial.Keywords: Intracorneal ring segments, keratoconushttps://www.dovepress.com/intracorneal-ring-segments-in-keratoconus-a-narrative-literature-revie-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTHIntracorneal ring segmentskeratoconus
spellingShingle Hayat UK
Shiwani HA
Memon D
Walkden A
Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature Review
Clinical Ophthalmology
Intracorneal ring segments
keratoconus
title Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature Review
title_full Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature Review
title_fullStr Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature Review
title_short Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature Review
title_sort intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus a narrative literature review
topic Intracorneal ring segments
keratoconus
url https://www.dovepress.com/intracorneal-ring-segments-in-keratoconus-a-narrative-literature-revie-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-OPTH
work_keys_str_mv AT hayatuk intracornealringsegmentsinkeratoconusanarrativeliteraturereview
AT shiwaniha intracornealringsegmentsinkeratoconusanarrativeliteraturereview
AT memond intracornealringsegmentsinkeratoconusanarrativeliteraturereview
AT walkdena intracornealringsegmentsinkeratoconusanarrativeliteraturereview