Scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation tends to underestimate change
Abstract Uncertainty is an irreducible part of predictive science, causing us to over‐ or underestimate the magnitude of change that a system of interest will face. In a reductionist approach, we may use predictions at the level of individual system components (e.g. species biomass), and combine the...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-08-01
|
| Series: | Methods in Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13621 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825206756772413440 |
|---|---|
| author | James A. Orr Jeremy J. Piggott Andrew L. Jackson Jean‐François Arnoldi |
| author_facet | James A. Orr Jeremy J. Piggott Andrew L. Jackson Jean‐François Arnoldi |
| author_sort | James A. Orr |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Uncertainty is an irreducible part of predictive science, causing us to over‐ or underestimate the magnitude of change that a system of interest will face. In a reductionist approach, we may use predictions at the level of individual system components (e.g. species biomass), and combine them to generate predictions for system‐level properties (e.g. ecosystem function). Here we show that this process of scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation has a surprising consequence: it tends to systematically underestimate the magnitude of system‐level change, an effect whose significance grows with the system's dimensionality. This stems from a geometric observation: in high dimensions there are more ways to be more different, than ways to be more similar. We focus on ecosystem‐level predictions generated from the combination of predictions at the species level. In this setting, the ecosystem's relevant dimensionality is a measure of its diversity (and not simply the number of species). We explain why dimensional effects do not play out when predicting change of a single linear aggregate property (e.g. total biomass), yet are revealed when predicting change of nonlinear properties (e.g. absolute biomass change, stability or diversity), and when several properties are considered at once to describe the ecosystem, as in multi‐functional ecology. As an application we discuss the consequences of our theory for multiple‐stressor research. This empirical field focuses on interactions between stressors, defined as the error made by a prediction based on their observed individual effects. Our geometric approach can be visualised and explored with a web application (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4611133), and we provide pseudocode outlining how our theory can be applied. Our findings highlight and describe the counter‐intuitive effects of scaling up uncertain predictions, effects that can occur in any field of science where a reductionist approach is used to generate predictions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-dfa5bec3beff4729afd43fda340e84d2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2041-210X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Methods in Ecology and Evolution |
| spelling | doaj-art-dfa5bec3beff4729afd43fda340e84d22025-02-07T06:21:05ZengWileyMethods in Ecology and Evolution2041-210X2021-08-011281521153210.1111/2041-210X.13621Scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation tends to underestimate changeJames A. Orr0Jeremy J. Piggott1Andrew L. Jackson2Jean‐François Arnoldi3Zoology Department School of Natural Sciences Trinity College Dublin Dublin IrelandZoology Department School of Natural Sciences Trinity College Dublin Dublin IrelandZoology Department School of Natural Sciences Trinity College Dublin Dublin IrelandZoology Department School of Natural Sciences Trinity College Dublin Dublin IrelandAbstract Uncertainty is an irreducible part of predictive science, causing us to over‐ or underestimate the magnitude of change that a system of interest will face. In a reductionist approach, we may use predictions at the level of individual system components (e.g. species biomass), and combine them to generate predictions for system‐level properties (e.g. ecosystem function). Here we show that this process of scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation has a surprising consequence: it tends to systematically underestimate the magnitude of system‐level change, an effect whose significance grows with the system's dimensionality. This stems from a geometric observation: in high dimensions there are more ways to be more different, than ways to be more similar. We focus on ecosystem‐level predictions generated from the combination of predictions at the species level. In this setting, the ecosystem's relevant dimensionality is a measure of its diversity (and not simply the number of species). We explain why dimensional effects do not play out when predicting change of a single linear aggregate property (e.g. total biomass), yet are revealed when predicting change of nonlinear properties (e.g. absolute biomass change, stability or diversity), and when several properties are considered at once to describe the ecosystem, as in multi‐functional ecology. As an application we discuss the consequences of our theory for multiple‐stressor research. This empirical field focuses on interactions between stressors, defined as the error made by a prediction based on their observed individual effects. Our geometric approach can be visualised and explored with a web application (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4611133), and we provide pseudocode outlining how our theory can be applied. Our findings highlight and describe the counter‐intuitive effects of scaling up uncertain predictions, effects that can occur in any field of science where a reductionist approach is used to generate predictions. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13621dimensionalitydiversity metricsecological complexitymechanistic predictionmulti‐functionalitymultiple stressors |
| spellingShingle | James A. Orr Jeremy J. Piggott Andrew L. Jackson Jean‐François Arnoldi Scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation tends to underestimate change Methods in Ecology and Evolution dimensionality diversity metrics ecological complexity mechanistic prediction multi‐functionality multiple stressors |
| title | Scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation tends to underestimate change |
| title_full | Scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation tends to underestimate change |
| title_fullStr | Scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation tends to underestimate change |
| title_full_unstemmed | Scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation tends to underestimate change |
| title_short | Scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation tends to underestimate change |
| title_sort | scaling up uncertain predictions to higher levels of organisation tends to underestimate change |
| topic | dimensionality diversity metrics ecological complexity mechanistic prediction multi‐functionality multiple stressors |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13621 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jamesaorr scalingupuncertainpredictionstohigherlevelsoforganisationtendstounderestimatechange AT jeremyjpiggott scalingupuncertainpredictionstohigherlevelsoforganisationtendstounderestimatechange AT andrewljackson scalingupuncertainpredictionstohigherlevelsoforganisationtendstounderestimatechange AT jeanfrancoisarnoldi scalingupuncertainpredictionstohigherlevelsoforganisationtendstounderestimatechange |