Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence
In «Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Revisited», the original target article for the various refutations that I comment on here, I revisited through a slightly different lens the subject of the article that I coauthored with Brian Leiter close to twenty years ago. That article has pr...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitat de Girona. Cátedra de Cultura Jurídica
2021-05-01
|
| Series: | Quaestio Facti |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22597 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850167738226442240 |
|---|---|
| author | Ronald Allen |
| author_facet | Ronald Allen |
| author_sort | Ronald Allen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In «Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Revisited», the original target article for the various refutations that I comment on here, I revisited through a slightly different lens the subject of the article that I coauthored with Brian Leiter close to twenty years ago. That article has prompted four responses from Professors Pardo, Spellman, Muffato, and Enoch. Professors Pardo and Spellman basically accept the implications of the original article and offer useful but friendly amendments. Prof. Muffato apparently does not want to dispute over my ground and so changes the subject, and in doing so offers a number of interesting points. Only the fourth, Prof. Enoch, has the same doubts about the utility of my original article as I do of the genre that gave rise to it. I can thus be quite brief in discussing professors Pardo, Spellman, and Muffato, but it will take bit more effort to lay out the limits of Prof. Enoch’s analysis. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-df8d0ce734574134a0aaa29d0a44f9c9 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2660-4515 2604-6202 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-05-01 |
| publisher | Universitat de Girona. Cátedra de Cultura Jurídica |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Quaestio Facti |
| spelling | doaj-art-df8d0ce734574134a0aaa29d0a44f9c92025-08-20T02:21:09ZengUniversitat de Girona. Cátedra de Cultura JurídicaQuaestio Facti2660-45152604-62022021-05-01310.33115/udg_bib/qf.i3.2259722456Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of EvidenceRonald Allen0Northwestern University Pritzker School of LawIn «Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Revisited», the original target article for the various refutations that I comment on here, I revisited through a slightly different lens the subject of the article that I coauthored with Brian Leiter close to twenty years ago. That article has prompted four responses from Professors Pardo, Spellman, Muffato, and Enoch. Professors Pardo and Spellman basically accept the implications of the original article and offer useful but friendly amendments. Prof. Muffato apparently does not want to dispute over my ground and so changes the subject, and in doing so offers a number of interesting points. Only the fourth, Prof. Enoch, has the same doubts about the utility of my original article as I do of the genre that gave rise to it. I can thus be quite brief in discussing professors Pardo, Spellman, and Muffato, but it will take bit more effort to lay out the limits of Prof. Enoch’s analysis.https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22597probabilityrelative plausibilityepistemologysafetysensitivity |
| spellingShingle | Ronald Allen Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence Quaestio Facti probability relative plausibility epistemology safety sensitivity |
| title | Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence |
| title_full | Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence |
| title_fullStr | Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence |
| title_full_unstemmed | Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence |
| title_short | Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence |
| title_sort | naturalized epistemology and the law of evidence |
| topic | probability relative plausibility epistemology safety sensitivity |
| url | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22597 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ronaldallen naturalizedepistemologyandthelawofevidence |