Does word knowledge account for the effect of world knowledge on pronoun interpretation?

To what extent can statistical language knowledge account for the effects of world knowledge in language comprehension? We address this question by focusing on a core aspect of language understanding: pronoun resolution. While existing studies suggest that comprehenders use world knowledge to resolv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cameron R. Jones, Benjamin Bergen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-12-01
Series:Language and Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980824000024/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850174606658240512
author Cameron R. Jones
Benjamin Bergen
author_facet Cameron R. Jones
Benjamin Bergen
author_sort Cameron R. Jones
collection DOAJ
description To what extent can statistical language knowledge account for the effects of world knowledge in language comprehension? We address this question by focusing on a core aspect of language understanding: pronoun resolution. While existing studies suggest that comprehenders use world knowledge to resolve pronouns, the distributional hypothesis and its operationalization in large language models (LLMs) provide an alternative account of how purely linguistic information could drive apparent world knowledge effects. We addressed these confounds in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we found a strong effect of world knowledge plausibility (measured using a norming study) on responses to comprehension questions that probed pronoun interpretation. In experiment 2, participants were slower to read continuations that contradicted world knowledge-consistent interpretations of a pronoun, implying that comprehenders deploy world knowledge spontaneously. Both effects persisted when controlling for the predictions of GPT-3, an LLM, suggesting that pronoun interpretation is at least partly driven by knowledge about the world and not the word. We propose two potential mechanisms by which knowledge-driven pronoun resolution occurs, based on validation- and expectation-driven discourse processes. The results suggest that while distributional information may capture some aspects of world knowledge, human comprehenders likely draw on other sources unavailable to LLMs.
format Article
id doaj-art-df32a40045f548c8aa98898015120836
institution OA Journals
issn 1866-9808
1866-9859
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Language and Cognition
spelling doaj-art-df32a40045f548c8aa988980151208362025-08-20T02:19:37ZengCambridge University PressLanguage and Cognition1866-98081866-98592024-12-01161182121310.1017/langcog.2024.2Does word knowledge account for the effect of world knowledge on pronoun interpretation?Cameron R. Jones0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6609-8966Benjamin Bergen1Department of Cognitive Science, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USADepartment of Cognitive Science, UC San Diego, San Diego, CA, USATo what extent can statistical language knowledge account for the effects of world knowledge in language comprehension? We address this question by focusing on a core aspect of language understanding: pronoun resolution. While existing studies suggest that comprehenders use world knowledge to resolve pronouns, the distributional hypothesis and its operationalization in large language models (LLMs) provide an alternative account of how purely linguistic information could drive apparent world knowledge effects. We addressed these confounds in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we found a strong effect of world knowledge plausibility (measured using a norming study) on responses to comprehension questions that probed pronoun interpretation. In experiment 2, participants were slower to read continuations that contradicted world knowledge-consistent interpretations of a pronoun, implying that comprehenders deploy world knowledge spontaneously. Both effects persisted when controlling for the predictions of GPT-3, an LLM, suggesting that pronoun interpretation is at least partly driven by knowledge about the world and not the word. We propose two potential mechanisms by which knowledge-driven pronoun resolution occurs, based on validation- and expectation-driven discourse processes. The results suggest that while distributional information may capture some aspects of world knowledge, human comprehenders likely draw on other sources unavailable to LLMs.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980824000024/type/journal_articledistributional baselinedistributional hypothesislarge language modelspronoun resolutionworld knowledge
spellingShingle Cameron R. Jones
Benjamin Bergen
Does word knowledge account for the effect of world knowledge on pronoun interpretation?
Language and Cognition
distributional baseline
distributional hypothesis
large language models
pronoun resolution
world knowledge
title Does word knowledge account for the effect of world knowledge on pronoun interpretation?
title_full Does word knowledge account for the effect of world knowledge on pronoun interpretation?
title_fullStr Does word knowledge account for the effect of world knowledge on pronoun interpretation?
title_full_unstemmed Does word knowledge account for the effect of world knowledge on pronoun interpretation?
title_short Does word knowledge account for the effect of world knowledge on pronoun interpretation?
title_sort does word knowledge account for the effect of world knowledge on pronoun interpretation
topic distributional baseline
distributional hypothesis
large language models
pronoun resolution
world knowledge
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1866980824000024/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT cameronrjones doeswordknowledgeaccountfortheeffectofworldknowledgeonpronouninterpretation
AT benjaminbergen doeswordknowledgeaccountfortheeffectofworldknowledgeonpronouninterpretation