L’aroumain, dialecte du roumain ou langue à part ?
The idea that Aromanian was a dialect of Romanian was long taken for granted, but it was not until after the Second World War that an attempt was made to argue it scientifically. They are based on the positions taken by renowned linguists such as A. Rosetti or D. Macrea and, later, M. Caragiu Marioţ...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de la méditerranée
|
| Series: | Lengas |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/lengas/6229 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The idea that Aromanian was a dialect of Romanian was long taken for granted, but it was not until after the Second World War that an attempt was made to argue it scientifically. They are based on the positions taken by renowned linguists such as A. Rosetti or D. Macrea and, later, M. Caragiu Marioţeanu in the heated controversy that opposed them to A. Graur and I. Coteanu. This idea, which had become a quasi-official thesis in Romania, was challenged from the 1990s by the demands of an unexpected collective actor, the speakers of Aromanian who wanted to cultivate their mother tongue. Subsequently, a number of scholars outside Romania, particularly German-speaking ones, such as W. Dahmen or J. Kramer, and later T. Kahl, echoed this view, without their Romanian colleagues changing their position. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2271-5703 |