Comparative multimodal sensory testing in multifocal motor neuropathy and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Background. One of the key distinctions between multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (mCIDP) lies in the presence or absence of sensory deficits. Nevertheless, existing literature suggests that MMN can also involve sens...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. A. Tumilovich, D. A. Grishina, N. A. Suponeva, P. A. Fedin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2024-03-01
Series:Нервно-мышечные болезни
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nmb.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/586
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849240916433305600
author T. A. Tumilovich
D. A. Grishina
N. A. Suponeva
P. A. Fedin
author_facet T. A. Tumilovich
D. A. Grishina
N. A. Suponeva
P. A. Fedin
author_sort T. A. Tumilovich
collection DOAJ
description Background. One of the key distinctions between multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (mCIDP) lies in the presence or absence of sensory deficits. Nevertheless, existing literature suggests that MMN can also involve sensory fibers of peripheral nerves, complicating the differential diagnosis of MMN and mCIDP, which remains a relevant issue.Aim. To evaluate the profile and intensity of objective sensory deficits and autonomic dysfunction in MMN and mCIDP, as well as to identify differential diagnostic markers.Materials and methods. Out of 65 patients followed up in the study, 30 were diagnosed with MMN and 35 were diagnosed with mCIDP. A retrospective analysis of clinical and epidemiological characteristics was carried out. The evaluation encompassed clinical assessments of sensory symptoms (including on the NTSS-9 scale), assessments of the severity of autonomic dysfunction using the COMPASS-31 questionnaire, and neurophysiological multimodal sensory testing (including electroneuromyography, computer pallesthesiometry, and short-latency auditory evoked potentials).Results. Patients with mCIDP were significantly more likely to have subjective (according to the NTSS-9 and COMPASS-31 scales) and objective (according to clinical examination) sensory deficits and autonomic dysfunction (p <0.05). A third of patients with MMN reported sensory complaints, yet there was no objective evidence of impaired pain sensitivity. Changes in vibration sensitivity were equally prevalent during clinical assessment in both groups (p >0.05). Electroneuromyography studies revealed significantly lower amplitudes of hand sensory nerve action potentials in the mCIDP group compared to MMN patients (p <0.05). At the same time, a third of patients with MMN with a previous history of disease of 13 [10.0; 16.0] years also had low amplitudes of hand sensory nerve action potentials. The mean value of the autonomic reaction threshold, as well as the cutaneous vibration perception threshold were significantly higher in mCIDP compared to MMN (p <0.05) when examining the hands.Conclusion. Differential diagnosis of MMN and mCIDP at the onset and in early disease (under 5 years) poses no challenges. However, it has been shown that a third of patients with MMN in the long-term catamnesis of the disease have some kind of sensory impairment, which may complicate the differential diagnosis with mCIDP. In such cases, employing computer pallesthesiography to measure vibration perception threshold can aid in clarifying the diagnosis and determining optimal treatment strategies.
format Article
id doaj-art-defcad143db54ebf82156d6c9fa080c8
institution Kabale University
issn 2222-8721
2413-0443
language Russian
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher ABV-press
record_format Article
series Нервно-мышечные болезни
spelling doaj-art-defcad143db54ebf82156d6c9fa080c82025-08-20T04:00:20ZrusABV-pressНервно-мышечные болезни2222-87212413-04432024-03-01141102410.17650/2222-8721-2024-14-1-10-24371Comparative multimodal sensory testing in multifocal motor neuropathy and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathyT. A. Tumilovich0D. A. Grishina1N. A. Suponeva2P. A. Fedin3Research Center of NeurologyResearch Center of NeurologyResearch Center of NeurologyResearch Center of NeurologyBackground. One of the key distinctions between multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (mCIDP) lies in the presence or absence of sensory deficits. Nevertheless, existing literature suggests that MMN can also involve sensory fibers of peripheral nerves, complicating the differential diagnosis of MMN and mCIDP, which remains a relevant issue.Aim. To evaluate the profile and intensity of objective sensory deficits and autonomic dysfunction in MMN and mCIDP, as well as to identify differential diagnostic markers.Materials and methods. Out of 65 patients followed up in the study, 30 were diagnosed with MMN and 35 were diagnosed with mCIDP. A retrospective analysis of clinical and epidemiological characteristics was carried out. The evaluation encompassed clinical assessments of sensory symptoms (including on the NTSS-9 scale), assessments of the severity of autonomic dysfunction using the COMPASS-31 questionnaire, and neurophysiological multimodal sensory testing (including electroneuromyography, computer pallesthesiometry, and short-latency auditory evoked potentials).Results. Patients with mCIDP were significantly more likely to have subjective (according to the NTSS-9 and COMPASS-31 scales) and objective (according to clinical examination) sensory deficits and autonomic dysfunction (p <0.05). A third of patients with MMN reported sensory complaints, yet there was no objective evidence of impaired pain sensitivity. Changes in vibration sensitivity were equally prevalent during clinical assessment in both groups (p >0.05). Electroneuromyography studies revealed significantly lower amplitudes of hand sensory nerve action potentials in the mCIDP group compared to MMN patients (p <0.05). At the same time, a third of patients with MMN with a previous history of disease of 13 [10.0; 16.0] years also had low amplitudes of hand sensory nerve action potentials. The mean value of the autonomic reaction threshold, as well as the cutaneous vibration perception threshold were significantly higher in mCIDP compared to MMN (p <0.05) when examining the hands.Conclusion. Differential diagnosis of MMN and mCIDP at the onset and in early disease (under 5 years) poses no challenges. However, it has been shown that a third of patients with MMN in the long-term catamnesis of the disease have some kind of sensory impairment, which may complicate the differential diagnosis with mCIDP. In such cases, employing computer pallesthesiography to measure vibration perception threshold can aid in clarifying the diagnosis and determining optimal treatment strategies.https://nmb.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/586multifocal motor neuropathymultifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathysensory deficitssensory fibersdifferential diagnosis
spellingShingle T. A. Tumilovich
D. A. Grishina
N. A. Suponeva
P. A. Fedin
Comparative multimodal sensory testing in multifocal motor neuropathy and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
Нервно-мышечные болезни
multifocal motor neuropathy
multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy
sensory deficits
sensory fibers
differential diagnosis
title Comparative multimodal sensory testing in multifocal motor neuropathy and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_full Comparative multimodal sensory testing in multifocal motor neuropathy and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_fullStr Comparative multimodal sensory testing in multifocal motor neuropathy and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative multimodal sensory testing in multifocal motor neuropathy and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_short Comparative multimodal sensory testing in multifocal motor neuropathy and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
title_sort comparative multimodal sensory testing in multifocal motor neuropathy and multifocal variant of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
topic multifocal motor neuropathy
multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy
sensory deficits
sensory fibers
differential diagnosis
url https://nmb.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/586
work_keys_str_mv AT tatumilovich comparativemultimodalsensorytestinginmultifocalmotorneuropathyandmultifocalvariantofchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT dagrishina comparativemultimodalsensorytestinginmultifocalmotorneuropathyandmultifocalvariantofchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT nasuponeva comparativemultimodalsensorytestinginmultifocalmotorneuropathyandmultifocalvariantofchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy
AT pafedin comparativemultimodalsensorytestinginmultifocalmotorneuropathyandmultifocalvariantofchronicinflammatorydemyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy