Amphibolia and Rhetorical Criticism in Isocrates’ Panathenaicus
The dialogue section in Isocrates Panathenaicus (§199–266) contains the earliest reference to amphiboly in rhetorical literature. The Laconophile former student introduced as advocatus diaboli in this section describes Isocratean arguments as logoi amphiboloi (§239f). In a way very similar to Aristo...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
University of Ottawa & Laval University
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | Cahiers des Études Anciennes |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/etudesanciennes/2570 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850258959919742976 |
|---|---|
| author | Thomas Blank |
| author_facet | Thomas Blank |
| author_sort | Thomas Blank |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The dialogue section in Isocrates Panathenaicus (§199–266) contains the earliest reference to amphiboly in rhetorical literature. The Laconophile former student introduced as advocatus diaboli in this section describes Isocratean arguments as logoi amphiboloi (§239f). In a way very similar to Aristotle’s notion of amphibolia, he understands these to be arguments that are meant to obscure the moral implications and dissimulate the intentions of a speech. This article argues that by introducing a rhetorical concept like this in an educational (and literary) setting, Isocrates sets his students (and readers) the task to identify the moral ambiguity of arguments they are presented with. Thus, they are enabled by training to critically assess the moral problems underlying the issues under discussions and unmask the flattery or slander involved in public speech. While Aristotle introduced amphibolia as a (weak) type of argument from the perspective of rhetorical composition, Isocrates is focused on audience reception and rhetorical criticism. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-dee68286c8ef471681d493692a5efe63 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 0317-5065 1923-2713 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | University of Ottawa & Laval University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cahiers des Études Anciennes |
| spelling | doaj-art-dee68286c8ef471681d493692a5efe632025-08-20T01:56:00ZfraUniversity of Ottawa & Laval UniversityCahiers des Études Anciennes0317-50651923-27132023-04-0160Amphibolia and Rhetorical Criticism in Isocrates’ PanathenaicusThomas BlankThe dialogue section in Isocrates Panathenaicus (§199–266) contains the earliest reference to amphiboly in rhetorical literature. The Laconophile former student introduced as advocatus diaboli in this section describes Isocratean arguments as logoi amphiboloi (§239f). In a way very similar to Aristotle’s notion of amphibolia, he understands these to be arguments that are meant to obscure the moral implications and dissimulate the intentions of a speech. This article argues that by introducing a rhetorical concept like this in an educational (and literary) setting, Isocrates sets his students (and readers) the task to identify the moral ambiguity of arguments they are presented with. Thus, they are enabled by training to critically assess the moral problems underlying the issues under discussions and unmask the flattery or slander involved in public speech. While Aristotle introduced amphibolia as a (weak) type of argument from the perspective of rhetorical composition, Isocrates is focused on audience reception and rhetorical criticism. https://journals.openedition.org/etudesanciennes/2570AmbiguityAmphiboliaAristotleDialogueDissimulationEducation |
| spellingShingle | Thomas Blank Amphibolia and Rhetorical Criticism in Isocrates’ Panathenaicus Cahiers des Études Anciennes Ambiguity Amphibolia Aristotle Dialogue Dissimulation Education |
| title | Amphibolia and Rhetorical Criticism in Isocrates’ Panathenaicus |
| title_full | Amphibolia and Rhetorical Criticism in Isocrates’ Panathenaicus |
| title_fullStr | Amphibolia and Rhetorical Criticism in Isocrates’ Panathenaicus |
| title_full_unstemmed | Amphibolia and Rhetorical Criticism in Isocrates’ Panathenaicus |
| title_short | Amphibolia and Rhetorical Criticism in Isocrates’ Panathenaicus |
| title_sort | amphibolia and rhetorical criticism in isocrates panathenaicus |
| topic | Ambiguity Amphibolia Aristotle Dialogue Dissimulation Education |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/etudesanciennes/2570 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasblank amphiboliaandrhetoricalcriticisminisocratespanathenaicus |