Efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul glaucoma implant compared to the Ahmed glaucoma valve

Abstract This study compares the one-year outcomes of standalone Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation and standalone Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) in adult patients with primary and secondary glaucoma. A retrospective, single-center, comparative study was conducted on adult patients who underwent s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angi Lizbeth Mendoza-Moreira, Julia V. Stingl, Anna Maria Voigt, Jasmin Rezapour, Achim Fiess, Felix Mathias Wagner, Alexander K. Schuster, Esther M. Hoffmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00839-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849726132142735360
author Angi Lizbeth Mendoza-Moreira
Julia V. Stingl
Anna Maria Voigt
Jasmin Rezapour
Achim Fiess
Felix Mathias Wagner
Alexander K. Schuster
Esther M. Hoffmann
author_facet Angi Lizbeth Mendoza-Moreira
Julia V. Stingl
Anna Maria Voigt
Jasmin Rezapour
Achim Fiess
Felix Mathias Wagner
Alexander K. Schuster
Esther M. Hoffmann
author_sort Angi Lizbeth Mendoza-Moreira
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study compares the one-year outcomes of standalone Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation and standalone Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) in adult patients with primary and secondary glaucoma. A retrospective, single-center, comparative study was conducted on adult patients who underwent standalone PGI and AGV at the University Medical Center Mainz. The primary outcome measures were the changes of IOP and the number of antiglaucoma eye medication at one year postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included complete and qualified success rates, failure rates, visual acuity logMAR and the incidence of adverse events. A total of 24 adult patients were included in the AGV group and 28 in the PGI group. The median preoperative intraocular pressure decreased from 29.5mmHg (Interquartile range (IQR) 21–42) to 16.0mmHg (IQR 7–37) in the AGV group, and from 34.0 mmHg (IQR 13–56) to 16.0 (IQR 7–21) mmHg in the PGI group at the one-year follow-up. The median number of classes of intraocular pressure-lowering medications reduced from 3.5 to 0 in the AGV group, and from 3.0 to 0 in the PGI group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any success criteria or failure. The AGV produced more encapsulation than the PGI, and the latter more tube exposures. Both the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve and the Paul Glaucoma Implant effectively reduce IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications at one year with comparable safety profiles.
format Article
id doaj-art-dedaa8ca76734a56bdde0ff871e8ac51
institution DOAJ
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-dedaa8ca76734a56bdde0ff871e8ac512025-08-20T03:10:17ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-05-0115111510.1038/s41598-025-00839-0Efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul glaucoma implant compared to the Ahmed glaucoma valveAngi Lizbeth Mendoza-Moreira0Julia V. Stingl1Anna Maria Voigt2Jasmin Rezapour3Achim Fiess4Felix Mathias Wagner5Alexander K. Schuster6Esther M. Hoffmann7Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center MainzAbstract This study compares the one-year outcomes of standalone Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation and standalone Paul glaucoma implant (PGI) in adult patients with primary and secondary glaucoma. A retrospective, single-center, comparative study was conducted on adult patients who underwent standalone PGI and AGV at the University Medical Center Mainz. The primary outcome measures were the changes of IOP and the number of antiglaucoma eye medication at one year postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included complete and qualified success rates, failure rates, visual acuity logMAR and the incidence of adverse events. A total of 24 adult patients were included in the AGV group and 28 in the PGI group. The median preoperative intraocular pressure decreased from 29.5mmHg (Interquartile range (IQR) 21–42) to 16.0mmHg (IQR 7–37) in the AGV group, and from 34.0 mmHg (IQR 13–56) to 16.0 (IQR 7–21) mmHg in the PGI group at the one-year follow-up. The median number of classes of intraocular pressure-lowering medications reduced from 3.5 to 0 in the AGV group, and from 3.0 to 0 in the PGI group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any success criteria or failure. The AGV produced more encapsulation than the PGI, and the latter more tube exposures. Both the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve and the Paul Glaucoma Implant effectively reduce IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications at one year with comparable safety profiles.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00839-0Ahmed glaucoma valveDrainagePaul glaucoma implantGlaucomaTube
spellingShingle Angi Lizbeth Mendoza-Moreira
Julia V. Stingl
Anna Maria Voigt
Jasmin Rezapour
Achim Fiess
Felix Mathias Wagner
Alexander K. Schuster
Esther M. Hoffmann
Efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul glaucoma implant compared to the Ahmed glaucoma valve
Scientific Reports
Ahmed glaucoma valve
Drainage
Paul glaucoma implant
Glaucoma
Tube
title Efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul glaucoma implant compared to the Ahmed glaucoma valve
title_full Efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul glaucoma implant compared to the Ahmed glaucoma valve
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul glaucoma implant compared to the Ahmed glaucoma valve
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul glaucoma implant compared to the Ahmed glaucoma valve
title_short Efficacy and safety outcomes of the Paul glaucoma implant compared to the Ahmed glaucoma valve
title_sort efficacy and safety outcomes of the paul glaucoma implant compared to the ahmed glaucoma valve
topic Ahmed glaucoma valve
Drainage
Paul glaucoma implant
Glaucoma
Tube
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00839-0
work_keys_str_mv AT angilizbethmendozamoreira efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofthepaulglaucomaimplantcomparedtotheahmedglaucomavalve
AT juliavstingl efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofthepaulglaucomaimplantcomparedtotheahmedglaucomavalve
AT annamariavoigt efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofthepaulglaucomaimplantcomparedtotheahmedglaucomavalve
AT jasminrezapour efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofthepaulglaucomaimplantcomparedtotheahmedglaucomavalve
AT achimfiess efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofthepaulglaucomaimplantcomparedtotheahmedglaucomavalve
AT felixmathiaswagner efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofthepaulglaucomaimplantcomparedtotheahmedglaucomavalve
AT alexanderkschuster efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofthepaulglaucomaimplantcomparedtotheahmedglaucomavalve
AT esthermhoffmann efficacyandsafetyoutcomesofthepaulglaucomaimplantcomparedtotheahmedglaucomavalve