Early Life Nutrition and Its Effects on the Developing Heifer: Immune and Metabolic Responses to Immune Challenges
This experiment aimed to assess the effects of both preweaning nutrition and postweaning growth rate on the resilience of dairy heifers from birth to 20 months of age. Immune competence and metabolic characteristics were assessed via repeated vaccine immune challenges throughout early life. Heifers...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-05-01
|
| Series: | Animals |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/15/10/1379 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This experiment aimed to assess the effects of both preweaning nutrition and postweaning growth rate on the resilience of dairy heifers from birth to 20 months of age. Immune competence and metabolic characteristics were assessed via repeated vaccine immune challenges throughout early life. Heifers were subject to either a high or low preweaning nutritional treatment (high: 8 L vs. low: 4 L of milk per day). Calves in these treatment groups were then equally divided into either a high or low postweaning growth rate treatment until 20 months of age. Nutritional intake, growth and metabolic data can be found in a companion paper, while the current paper outlines the responses to the three immune challenges. In the preweaning phase, heifers on a high milk volume had superior immune competence, demonstrated by higher monocyte and eosinophil counts. All other immune biomarkers were not different between treatments. By 8 months of age, the differences in monocytes were lost; however, the differences in preweaning eosinophil counts remained at 8 months and through to 13 months of age. At 13 months of age, there were also three-way interaction effects of preweaning nutrition, postweaning growth rate and vaccination for white blood cell count and neutrophil count; however, the trends in these responses appear random and do not align towards any clear advantages of pre- or postweaning nutrition. Metabolic responses to the immune challenges do not suggest any form of carryover effect from the preweaning phase and seemed to reflect the nutritional input at the time. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2076-2615 |