Specificity of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of two clinical cases

Introduction. The heterogeneity of the forms and severity of Guillain-Barre syndrome explains the variability of recovery: from rapid and complete (in most cases) to slow with the development of persistent residual deficiency (rarely). It is unclear how effective the Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. A. Grishina, N. A. Suponeva
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: ABV-press 2020-12-01
Series:Нервно-мышечные болезни
Subjects:
Online Access:https://nmb.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/407
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849403651777363968
author D. A. Grishina
N. A. Suponeva
author_facet D. A. Grishina
N. A. Suponeva
author_sort D. A. Grishina
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. The heterogeneity of the forms and severity of Guillain-Barre syndrome explains the variability of recovery: from rapid and complete (in most cases) to slow with the development of persistent residual deficiency (rarely). It is unclear how effective the Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and its modified version are for different forms of the disease.The aim of the study – to demonstrate the features of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of 2 clinical cases; to show the possibilities of Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and its modified version in predicting recovery in this form of the disease.Materials and methods. Data from 2 patients with acute motor axonal neuropathy with motor conduction blocks were retrospectively analyzed. Calculation of the score and assessment of the prognosis of walking recovery by 6 months from the onset of the disease were performed using the online calculator International Guillain-Barre syndrome Outcome Study Prognosis tool in the acute period.Results. In both patients, the forecast of recovery of walking by half a year from the onset of the disease on the Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and modified Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores scales in the acute period was erroneous. In the first case, the total score on the Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and its modification in the acute period was 5 and 10 points respectively (poor prognosis), which foreshadowed a long rehabilitation process and incomplete recovery. However, the regression of disorders was dramatic and complete, and by the second month of the disease, only minimal motor disorders remained. In the second patient, on the contrary, the total Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and its modification during the period of increasing symptoms was 3 and 7 points respectively (good prognosis), while recovery was delayed – only by 5 months from the onset of the disease, the ability to move with support was restored.Conclusion. The Guillain–Barre syndrome is a disease with a favorable prognosis for recovery. However, the prediction of regression of motor disorders should be approached carefully, because in some cases, generally accepted criteria and prognostic scales may not work. Acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks is a unique form of the disease that has pathophysiological and clinical-neurophysiological features, which should be taken into account when managing this category of patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-decdd1236daf43d997686163f2365af2
institution Kabale University
issn 2222-8721
2413-0443
language Russian
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher ABV-press
record_format Article
series Нервно-мышечные болезни
spelling doaj-art-decdd1236daf43d997686163f2365af22025-08-20T03:37:12ZrusABV-pressНервно-мышечные болезни2222-87212413-04432020-12-01104435110.17650/2222-8721-2020-10-4-43-51283Specificity of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of two clinical casesD. A. Grishina0N. A. Suponeva1Research Center of NeurologyResearch Center of NeurologyIntroduction. The heterogeneity of the forms and severity of Guillain-Barre syndrome explains the variability of recovery: from rapid and complete (in most cases) to slow with the development of persistent residual deficiency (rarely). It is unclear how effective the Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and its modified version are for different forms of the disease.The aim of the study – to demonstrate the features of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of 2 clinical cases; to show the possibilities of Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and its modified version in predicting recovery in this form of the disease.Materials and methods. Data from 2 patients with acute motor axonal neuropathy with motor conduction blocks were retrospectively analyzed. Calculation of the score and assessment of the prognosis of walking recovery by 6 months from the onset of the disease were performed using the online calculator International Guillain-Barre syndrome Outcome Study Prognosis tool in the acute period.Results. In both patients, the forecast of recovery of walking by half a year from the onset of the disease on the Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and modified Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores scales in the acute period was erroneous. In the first case, the total score on the Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and its modification in the acute period was 5 and 10 points respectively (poor prognosis), which foreshadowed a long rehabilitation process and incomplete recovery. However, the regression of disorders was dramatic and complete, and by the second month of the disease, only minimal motor disorders remained. In the second patient, on the contrary, the total Erasmus Guillain–Barre syndrome Outcome Scores and its modification during the period of increasing symptoms was 3 and 7 points respectively (good prognosis), while recovery was delayed – only by 5 months from the onset of the disease, the ability to move with support was restored.Conclusion. The Guillain–Barre syndrome is a disease with a favorable prognosis for recovery. However, the prediction of regression of motor disorders should be approached carefully, because in some cases, generally accepted criteria and prognostic scales may not work. Acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks is a unique form of the disease that has pathophysiological and clinical-neurophysiological features, which should be taken into account when managing this category of patients.https://nmb.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/407acute motor axonal neuropathyconduction blockguillain–barre syndromeprognosisrecoveryprognostic scaleegosmegos
spellingShingle D. A. Grishina
N. A. Suponeva
Specificity of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of two clinical cases
Нервно-мышечные болезни
acute motor axonal neuropathy
conduction block
guillain–barre syndrome
prognosis
recovery
prognostic scale
egos
megos
title Specificity of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of two clinical cases
title_full Specificity of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of two clinical cases
title_fullStr Specificity of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of two clinical cases
title_full_unstemmed Specificity of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of two clinical cases
title_short Specificity of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of two clinical cases
title_sort specificity of recovery in acute motor axonal neuropathy with conduction blocks on the example of two clinical cases
topic acute motor axonal neuropathy
conduction block
guillain–barre syndrome
prognosis
recovery
prognostic scale
egos
megos
url https://nmb.abvpress.ru/jour/article/view/407
work_keys_str_mv AT dagrishina specificityofrecoveryinacutemotoraxonalneuropathywithconductionblocksontheexampleoftwoclinicalcases
AT nasuponeva specificityofrecoveryinacutemotoraxonalneuropathywithconductionblocksontheexampleoftwoclinicalcases