Irish Influence in the Consonantal Spellings of Old English
The consonantal spellings of Old English (OE) were significantly influenced by the consonantal spellings of Old Irish (OI). 1) <th/þ> vs. (post-vocalic) <d/ð>: though OE did not have a distinction between /θ/ and /ð/, OI did, spelling this as <th> vs. (postvocalic) <d>. 2)...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institute of English Studies
2017-10-01
|
| Series: | Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.anglica.ia.uw.edu.pl/images/pdf/26-2-articles/Anglica_26-2_DLWhite_5-23.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846094222307885056 |
|---|---|
| author | David L. White |
| author_facet | David L. White |
| author_sort | David L. White |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The consonantal spellings of Old English (OE) were significantly influenced by the
consonantal spellings of Old Irish (OI). 1) <th/þ> vs. (post-vocalic) <d/ð>: though OE
did not have a distinction between /θ/ and /ð/, OI did, spelling this as <th> vs. (postvocalic)
<d>. 2) <h> vs. <ch>: though OE did not have a distinction between /h/ and
/x/, OI did, spelling the latter as <ch>. 3) <ch> and <th>: both spellings appear to be
from Irish. 4) <cg>: spellings of the “mixed voice” type, including “cg”, occur in OI,
where they can spell either single or geminate voiced plosives. 5) <bb> (and <cg>):
almost certainly in fi nal position <bb, cg> in OE represent singles, not geminates, as
they can in OI. 6) Spelling rules referring to post-vocalic position: all cases show
OE spelling having had, like OI spelling, rules referring to post-vocalic position,
which appear to be additionally evidenced by “illogical doubling” in Northumbrian.
7) The meaning of <g> before front Vs: in OE spelling as in OI spelling, but not as in
Roman Latin spelling, <g> before front Vs spells a palatal approximant rather than a palatal
affricate. The overall conclusion is that the OE spelling system was developed by Irish
missionary linguists. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-dec2213ba28f41c5ba63a9909ad39ff2 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0860-5734 0860-5734 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
| publisher | Institute of English Studies |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies |
| spelling | doaj-art-dec2213ba28f41c5ba63a9909ad39ff22025-01-02T14:49:49ZengInstitute of English StudiesAnglica. An International Journal of English Studies0860-57340860-57342017-10-01262523Irish Influence in the Consonantal Spellings of Old EnglishDavid L. White0Independent scholarThe consonantal spellings of Old English (OE) were significantly influenced by the consonantal spellings of Old Irish (OI). 1) <th/þ> vs. (post-vocalic) <d/ð>: though OE did not have a distinction between /θ/ and /ð/, OI did, spelling this as <th> vs. (postvocalic) <d>. 2) <h> vs. <ch>: though OE did not have a distinction between /h/ and /x/, OI did, spelling the latter as <ch>. 3) <ch> and <th>: both spellings appear to be from Irish. 4) <cg>: spellings of the “mixed voice” type, including “cg”, occur in OI, where they can spell either single or geminate voiced plosives. 5) <bb> (and <cg>): almost certainly in fi nal position <bb, cg> in OE represent singles, not geminates, as they can in OI. 6) Spelling rules referring to post-vocalic position: all cases show OE spelling having had, like OI spelling, rules referring to post-vocalic position, which appear to be additionally evidenced by “illogical doubling” in Northumbrian. 7) The meaning of <g> before front Vs: in OE spelling as in OI spelling, but not as in Roman Latin spelling, <g> before front Vs spells a palatal approximant rather than a palatal affricate. The overall conclusion is that the OE spelling system was developed by Irish missionary linguists.http://www.anglica.ia.uw.edu.pl/images/pdf/26-2-articles/Anglica_26-2_DLWhite_5-23.pdfspellingOld Irishconsonants |
| spellingShingle | David L. White Irish Influence in the Consonantal Spellings of Old English Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies spelling Old Irish consonants |
| title | Irish Influence in the Consonantal Spellings of Old English |
| title_full | Irish Influence in the Consonantal Spellings of Old English |
| title_fullStr | Irish Influence in the Consonantal Spellings of Old English |
| title_full_unstemmed | Irish Influence in the Consonantal Spellings of Old English |
| title_short | Irish Influence in the Consonantal Spellings of Old English |
| title_sort | irish influence in the consonantal spellings of old english |
| topic | spelling Old Irish consonants |
| url | http://www.anglica.ia.uw.edu.pl/images/pdf/26-2-articles/Anglica_26-2_DLWhite_5-23.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT davidlwhite irishinfluenceintheconsonantalspellingsofoldenglish |