Biological interactions and cooperative management of multiple species.

Coordinated decision making and actions have become the primary solution for the overexploitation of interacting resources within ecosystems. However, the success of coordinated management is highly sensitive to biological, economic, and social conditions. Here, using a game theoretic framework and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jinwei Jiang, Yong Min, Jie Chang, Ying Ge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180189&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850230340078010368
author Jinwei Jiang
Yong Min
Jie Chang
Ying Ge
author_facet Jinwei Jiang
Yong Min
Jie Chang
Ying Ge
author_sort Jinwei Jiang
collection DOAJ
description Coordinated decision making and actions have become the primary solution for the overexploitation of interacting resources within ecosystems. However, the success of coordinated management is highly sensitive to biological, economic, and social conditions. Here, using a game theoretic framework and a 2-species model that considers various biological relationships (competition, predation, and mutualism), we compute cooperative (or joint) and non-cooperative (or separate) management equilibrium outcomes of the model and investigate the effects of the type and strength of the relationships. We find that cooperation does not always show superiority to non-cooperation in all biological interactions: (1) if and only if resources are involved in high-intensity predation relationships, cooperation can achieve a win-win scenario for ecosystem services and resource diversity; (2) for competitive resources, cooperation realizes higher ecosystem services by sacrificing resource diversity; and (3) for mutual resources, cooperation has no obvious advantage for either ecosystem services or resource evenness but can slightly improve resource abundance. Furthermore, by using a fishery model of the North California Current Marine Ecosystem with 63 species and seven fleets, we demonstrate that the theoretical results can be reproduced in real ecosystems. Therefore, effective ecosystem management should consider the interconnection between stakeholders' social relationship and resources' biological relationships.
format Article
id doaj-art-debd187a62644342bf6bca070b4d61d3
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-debd187a62644342bf6bca070b4d61d32025-08-20T02:03:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01126e018018910.1371/journal.pone.0180189Biological interactions and cooperative management of multiple species.Jinwei JiangYong MinJie ChangYing GeCoordinated decision making and actions have become the primary solution for the overexploitation of interacting resources within ecosystems. However, the success of coordinated management is highly sensitive to biological, economic, and social conditions. Here, using a game theoretic framework and a 2-species model that considers various biological relationships (competition, predation, and mutualism), we compute cooperative (or joint) and non-cooperative (or separate) management equilibrium outcomes of the model and investigate the effects of the type and strength of the relationships. We find that cooperation does not always show superiority to non-cooperation in all biological interactions: (1) if and only if resources are involved in high-intensity predation relationships, cooperation can achieve a win-win scenario for ecosystem services and resource diversity; (2) for competitive resources, cooperation realizes higher ecosystem services by sacrificing resource diversity; and (3) for mutual resources, cooperation has no obvious advantage for either ecosystem services or resource evenness but can slightly improve resource abundance. Furthermore, by using a fishery model of the North California Current Marine Ecosystem with 63 species and seven fleets, we demonstrate that the theoretical results can be reproduced in real ecosystems. Therefore, effective ecosystem management should consider the interconnection between stakeholders' social relationship and resources' biological relationships.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180189&type=printable
spellingShingle Jinwei Jiang
Yong Min
Jie Chang
Ying Ge
Biological interactions and cooperative management of multiple species.
PLoS ONE
title Biological interactions and cooperative management of multiple species.
title_full Biological interactions and cooperative management of multiple species.
title_fullStr Biological interactions and cooperative management of multiple species.
title_full_unstemmed Biological interactions and cooperative management of multiple species.
title_short Biological interactions and cooperative management of multiple species.
title_sort biological interactions and cooperative management of multiple species
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180189&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT jinweijiang biologicalinteractionsandcooperativemanagementofmultiplespecies
AT yongmin biologicalinteractionsandcooperativemanagementofmultiplespecies
AT jiechang biologicalinteractionsandcooperativemanagementofmultiplespecies
AT yingge biologicalinteractionsandcooperativemanagementofmultiplespecies