Identity as a resource or a demand.

Individuals embody various social identities that can impact how they interface with the social environment. Stigma theories suggest that members of low-status or marginalized groups possess devalued social identities, and therefore, experience more stress. While social identities can lead to increa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karishma K Singh, Andrew J Elliot, Elizabeth D Handley, Jeremy P Jamieson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318449
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540217020514304
author Karishma K Singh
Andrew J Elliot
Elizabeth D Handley
Jeremy P Jamieson
author_facet Karishma K Singh
Andrew J Elliot
Elizabeth D Handley
Jeremy P Jamieson
author_sort Karishma K Singh
collection DOAJ
description Individuals embody various social identities that can impact how they interface with the social environment. Stigma theories suggest that members of low-status or marginalized groups possess devalued social identities, and therefore, experience more stress. While social identities can lead to increased stress, individuals' appraisals of their identities are not necessarily perceived as harmful/demanding. Rather, social identities can also be appraised as resources or sources of strength bringing opportunities and facilitating goal attainment. Using the biopsychosocial (BPS) model of challenge and threat as a conceptual foundation, this research developed a novel measure to assess individuals' appraisals of their social identities. In Study 1 (N = 575), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the theorized factor structure (i.e., resource and demand appraisals) and assessed the overall fit of the model. Structural equation modeling (SEM) tested for associations between the resource and demand latent factors. Individuals appraising their ethnic-racial identity as a resource exhibited improved self and intergroup outcomes, while those perceiving it as a demand reported worse self-based and intergroup outcomes, as well as more distress. Study 2 (N = 743 Black and White Americans), which was preregistered, examined group differences in appraisals of ethnic-racial identity. SEM revealed that Black participants were more likely than White participants to appraise their ethnic-racial identity as demanding, leading to worse social and intergroup outcomes. Even when Black participants perceived their ethnic-racial identity as a resource, they still reported higher levels of discrimination, intergroup anxiety, and behavioral avoidance compared to their White counterparts. Implications for theory development and application to the stress literature are discussed.
format Article
id doaj-art-deaecec4f0d546a5b29c689d46755628
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-deaecec4f0d546a5b29c689d467556282025-02-05T05:31:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01201e031844910.1371/journal.pone.0318449Identity as a resource or a demand.Karishma K SinghAndrew J ElliotElizabeth D HandleyJeremy P JamiesonIndividuals embody various social identities that can impact how they interface with the social environment. Stigma theories suggest that members of low-status or marginalized groups possess devalued social identities, and therefore, experience more stress. While social identities can lead to increased stress, individuals' appraisals of their identities are not necessarily perceived as harmful/demanding. Rather, social identities can also be appraised as resources or sources of strength bringing opportunities and facilitating goal attainment. Using the biopsychosocial (BPS) model of challenge and threat as a conceptual foundation, this research developed a novel measure to assess individuals' appraisals of their social identities. In Study 1 (N = 575), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the theorized factor structure (i.e., resource and demand appraisals) and assessed the overall fit of the model. Structural equation modeling (SEM) tested for associations between the resource and demand latent factors. Individuals appraising their ethnic-racial identity as a resource exhibited improved self and intergroup outcomes, while those perceiving it as a demand reported worse self-based and intergroup outcomes, as well as more distress. Study 2 (N = 743 Black and White Americans), which was preregistered, examined group differences in appraisals of ethnic-racial identity. SEM revealed that Black participants were more likely than White participants to appraise their ethnic-racial identity as demanding, leading to worse social and intergroup outcomes. Even when Black participants perceived their ethnic-racial identity as a resource, they still reported higher levels of discrimination, intergroup anxiety, and behavioral avoidance compared to their White counterparts. Implications for theory development and application to the stress literature are discussed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318449
spellingShingle Karishma K Singh
Andrew J Elliot
Elizabeth D Handley
Jeremy P Jamieson
Identity as a resource or a demand.
PLoS ONE
title Identity as a resource or a demand.
title_full Identity as a resource or a demand.
title_fullStr Identity as a resource or a demand.
title_full_unstemmed Identity as a resource or a demand.
title_short Identity as a resource or a demand.
title_sort identity as a resource or a demand
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318449
work_keys_str_mv AT karishmaksingh identityasaresourceorademand
AT andrewjelliot identityasaresourceorademand
AT elizabethdhandley identityasaresourceorademand
AT jeremypjamieson identityasaresourceorademand