Understanding the Differential Nature of Protest Movements in Africa Through Political Settlements Analysis: the Case of the ‘Fixthecountry’ Movement in Ghana
What explains why protest movements refuse the support of opposition parties despite the correlation in their demands? Answers to this question make up the content of this paper. In recent years, protest movements have dominated the political space of several sub-Saharan African countries, many o...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute for African Studies
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Ученые записки Института Африки Российской академии наук |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://africajournal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Zapiski-2-2023-8-101-116-Gerald-Emmanuel-Arhin.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849729500854616064 |
|---|---|
| author | ARHIN Gerald Emmanuel |
| author_facet | ARHIN Gerald Emmanuel |
| author_sort | ARHIN Gerald Emmanuel |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | What explains why protest movements refuse the support of opposition parties despite
the correlation in their demands? Answers to this question make up the content of this paper. In
recent years, protest movements have dominated the political space of several sub-Saharan African
countries, many of which have claimed to have no partisan ties. Relying on insights from the
detachment thesis, this paper argues that the nature of the strategies adopted by protest movements
in relation to political parties depends on the nature of the country’s political settlements. The study
uses the FixTheCountry protest movement in Ghana as a case study. After a discourse analysis into
speeches and press statements, an analysis of 15 qualitative interviews conducted in Ghana, as well
as a review of various secondary literature ranging from journal articles to books, this paper
concludes that protest movements instrumentalise the competitive nature of a country’s political
settlements to gain popular support from the citizenry. Given that only two political parties
dominate Ghana’s political arena, the protest movement presents itself as non-partisan, a strategy
intended to first, express distrust in both parties; and second, attract the attention of non-partisan
citizens and disaffected supporters of both parties. The paper demonstrates that the nature of a
country’s political settlements is a key determinant of the nature of the relationship between protest
movements and political parties, both ruling and opposition ones. This paper’s findings contribute
to our understanding of how contemporary African protest movements continue to shape and
reshape their relationship with political parties and the relevance of a country’s political structure
in the process. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-de92ef3584514a47b8fe0efe2e99811f |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2412-5717 3034-3496 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute for African Studies |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ученые записки Института Африки Российской академии наук |
| spelling | doaj-art-de92ef3584514a47b8fe0efe2e99811f2025-08-20T03:09:12ZengRussian Academy of Sciences, Institute for African StudiesУченые записки Института Африки Российской академии наук2412-57173034-34962023-06-019210111610.31132/2412-5717-2023-63-2-101-116Understanding the Differential Nature of Protest Movements in Africa Through Political Settlements Analysis: the Case of the ‘Fixthecountry’ Movement in GhanaARHIN Gerald Emmanuel0PhD Candidate Global Development Institute, University of Manchester Arthur Lewis Building, Global Development Institute, M13 9PL, Manchester, United KingdomWhat explains why protest movements refuse the support of opposition parties despite the correlation in their demands? Answers to this question make up the content of this paper. In recent years, protest movements have dominated the political space of several sub-Saharan African countries, many of which have claimed to have no partisan ties. Relying on insights from the detachment thesis, this paper argues that the nature of the strategies adopted by protest movements in relation to political parties depends on the nature of the country’s political settlements. The study uses the FixTheCountry protest movement in Ghana as a case study. After a discourse analysis into speeches and press statements, an analysis of 15 qualitative interviews conducted in Ghana, as well as a review of various secondary literature ranging from journal articles to books, this paper concludes that protest movements instrumentalise the competitive nature of a country’s political settlements to gain popular support from the citizenry. Given that only two political parties dominate Ghana’s political arena, the protest movement presents itself as non-partisan, a strategy intended to first, express distrust in both parties; and second, attract the attention of non-partisan citizens and disaffected supporters of both parties. The paper demonstrates that the nature of a country’s political settlements is a key determinant of the nature of the relationship between protest movements and political parties, both ruling and opposition ones. This paper’s findings contribute to our understanding of how contemporary African protest movements continue to shape and reshape their relationship with political parties and the relevance of a country’s political structure in the process.https://africajournal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Zapiski-2-2023-8-101-116-Gerald-Emmanuel-Arhin.pdfpolitical partiesprotest movementspolitical settlementghanafixthecountry |
| spellingShingle | ARHIN Gerald Emmanuel Understanding the Differential Nature of Protest Movements in Africa Through Political Settlements Analysis: the Case of the ‘Fixthecountry’ Movement in Ghana Ученые записки Института Африки Российской академии наук political parties protest movements political settlement ghana fixthecountry |
| title | Understanding the Differential Nature of Protest Movements in Africa Through Political Settlements Analysis: the Case of the ‘Fixthecountry’ Movement in Ghana |
| title_full | Understanding the Differential Nature of Protest Movements in Africa Through Political Settlements Analysis: the Case of the ‘Fixthecountry’ Movement in Ghana |
| title_fullStr | Understanding the Differential Nature of Protest Movements in Africa Through Political Settlements Analysis: the Case of the ‘Fixthecountry’ Movement in Ghana |
| title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the Differential Nature of Protest Movements in Africa Through Political Settlements Analysis: the Case of the ‘Fixthecountry’ Movement in Ghana |
| title_short | Understanding the Differential Nature of Protest Movements in Africa Through Political Settlements Analysis: the Case of the ‘Fixthecountry’ Movement in Ghana |
| title_sort | understanding the differential nature of protest movements in africa through political settlements analysis the case of the fixthecountry movement in ghana |
| topic | political parties protest movements political settlement ghana fixthecountry |
| url | https://africajournal.ru/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Zapiski-2-2023-8-101-116-Gerald-Emmanuel-Arhin.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arhingeraldemmanuel understandingthedifferentialnatureofprotestmovementsinafricathroughpoliticalsettlementsanalysisthecaseofthefixthecountrymovementinghana |