Understanding bias better: a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of EU agencies
European Union (EU) agencies are known to have a high risk of capture by regulated business interests. To limit this risk, agencies try to involve a diverse set of stakeholders. One way of doing so, is to install advisory councils (ACs): permanent bodies with a fixed number of stakeholders selected...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Political Research Exchange |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2474736X.2024.2306279 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850131196993863680 |
|---|---|
| author | Bastiaan Redert Peter Bursens |
| author_facet | Bastiaan Redert Peter Bursens |
| author_sort | Bastiaan Redert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | European Union (EU) agencies are known to have a high risk of capture by regulated business interests. To limit this risk, agencies try to involve a diverse set of stakeholders. One way of doing so, is to install advisory councils (ACs): permanent bodies with a fixed number of stakeholders selected by the agency. Current scholarship has mainly studied whether stakeholders’ access to ACs is biased towards business interests. However, it remains unknown whether the ACs functioning might also be biased. This research note presents a strategy to go beyond access and look inside the ACs. By examining how members perceive the councils, its meetings and the discussions therein, it explores whether the councils’ functioning contributes to more balanced interest representation. We illustrate that although the councils’ members are willing to prioritize seeking consensus over defending their own interests, finding this consensus proves difficult due to asymmetries in resources, thus stressing the need for a better understanding of bias. We end with proposing further qualitative approaches to study bias of advisory bodies in the future. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-de8d0a04b522499cbd95d54a04f446bc |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 2474-736X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Political Research Exchange |
| spelling | doaj-art-de8d0a04b522499cbd95d54a04f446bc2025-08-20T02:32:29ZengTaylor & Francis GroupPolitical Research Exchange2474-736X2024-12-016110.1080/2474736X.2024.2306279Understanding bias better: a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of EU agenciesBastiaan Redert0Peter Bursens1Department of Political Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumDepartment of Political Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, BelgiumEuropean Union (EU) agencies are known to have a high risk of capture by regulated business interests. To limit this risk, agencies try to involve a diverse set of stakeholders. One way of doing so, is to install advisory councils (ACs): permanent bodies with a fixed number of stakeholders selected by the agency. Current scholarship has mainly studied whether stakeholders’ access to ACs is biased towards business interests. However, it remains unknown whether the ACs functioning might also be biased. This research note presents a strategy to go beyond access and look inside the ACs. By examining how members perceive the councils, its meetings and the discussions therein, it explores whether the councils’ functioning contributes to more balanced interest representation. We illustrate that although the councils’ members are willing to prioritize seeking consensus over defending their own interests, finding this consensus proves difficult due to asymmetries in resources, thus stressing the need for a better understanding of bias. We end with proposing further qualitative approaches to study bias of advisory bodies in the future.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2474736X.2024.2306279Advisory councilsagenciesbiasstakeholdersEuropean Union |
| spellingShingle | Bastiaan Redert Peter Bursens Understanding bias better: a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of EU agencies Political Research Exchange Advisory councils agencies bias stakeholders European Union |
| title | Understanding bias better: a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of EU agencies |
| title_full | Understanding bias better: a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of EU agencies |
| title_fullStr | Understanding bias better: a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of EU agencies |
| title_full_unstemmed | Understanding bias better: a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of EU agencies |
| title_short | Understanding bias better: a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of EU agencies |
| title_sort | understanding bias better a qualitative exploration of bias in advisory councils of eu agencies |
| topic | Advisory councils agencies bias stakeholders European Union |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2474736X.2024.2306279 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bastiaanredert understandingbiasbetteraqualitativeexplorationofbiasinadvisorycouncilsofeuagencies AT peterbursens understandingbiasbetteraqualitativeexplorationofbiasinadvisorycouncilsofeuagencies |