Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru.

<h4>Background</h4>Even when tuberculosis (TB) treatment is free, hidden costs incurred by patients and their households (TB-affected households) may worsen poverty and health. Extreme TB-associated costs have been termed "catastrophic" but are poorly defined. We studied TB-aff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tom Wingfield, Delia Boccia, Marco Tovar, Arquímedes Gavino, Karine Zevallos, Rosario Montoya, Knut Lönnroth, Carlton A Evans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-07-01
Series:PLoS Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001675
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850163313265082368
author Tom Wingfield
Delia Boccia
Marco Tovar
Arquímedes Gavino
Karine Zevallos
Rosario Montoya
Knut Lönnroth
Carlton A Evans
author_facet Tom Wingfield
Delia Boccia
Marco Tovar
Arquímedes Gavino
Karine Zevallos
Rosario Montoya
Knut Lönnroth
Carlton A Evans
author_sort Tom Wingfield
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Even when tuberculosis (TB) treatment is free, hidden costs incurred by patients and their households (TB-affected households) may worsen poverty and health. Extreme TB-associated costs have been termed "catastrophic" but are poorly defined. We studied TB-affected households' hidden costs and their association with adverse TB outcome to create a clinically relevant definition of catastrophic costs.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>From 26 October 2002 to 30 November 2009, TB patients (n = 876, 11% with multi-drug-resistant [MDR] TB) and healthy controls (n = 487) were recruited to a prospective cohort study in shantytowns in Lima, Peru. Patients were interviewed prior to and every 2-4 wk throughout treatment, recording direct (household expenses) and indirect (lost income) TB-related costs. Costs were expressed as a proportion of the household's annual income. In poorer households, costs were lower but constituted a higher proportion of the household's annual income: 27% (95% CI = 20%-43%) in the least-poor houses versus 48% (95% CI = 36%-50%) in the poorest. Adverse TB outcome was defined as death, treatment abandonment or treatment failure during therapy, or recurrence within 2 y. 23% (166/725) of patients with a defined treatment outcome had an adverse outcome. Total costs ≥20% of household annual income was defined as catastrophic because this threshold was most strongly associated with adverse TB outcome. Catastrophic costs were incurred by 345 households (39%). Having MDR TB was associated with a higher likelihood of incurring catastrophic costs (54% [95% CI = 43%-61%] versus 38% [95% CI = 34%-41%], p<0.003). Adverse outcome was independently associated with MDR TB (odds ratio [OR] = 8.4 [95% CI = 4.7-15], p<0.001), previous TB (OR = 2.1 [95% CI = 1.3-3.5], p = 0.005), days too unwell to work pre-treatment (OR = 1.01 [95% CI = 1.00-1.01], p = 0.02), and catastrophic costs (OR = 1.7 [95% CI = 1.1-2.6], p = 0.01). The adjusted population attributable fraction of adverse outcomes explained by catastrophic costs was 18% (95% CI = 6.9%-28%), similar to that of MDR TB (20% [95% CI = 14%-25%]). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that existing catastrophic costs thresholds (≥10% or ≥15% of household annual income) were not associated with adverse outcome in our setting. Study limitations included not measuring certain "dis-saving" variables (including selling household items) and gathering only 6 mo of costs-specific follow-up data for MDR TB patients.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Despite free TB care, having TB disease was expensive for impoverished TB patients in Peru. Incurring higher relative costs was associated with adverse TB outcome. The population attributable fraction indicated that catastrophic costs and MDR TB were associated with similar proportions of adverse outcomes. Thus TB is a socioeconomic as well as infectious problem, and TB control interventions should address both the economic and clinical aspects of this disease. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
format Article
id doaj-art-de36a6f12f174072a62965d637f2ff9d
institution OA Journals
issn 1549-1277
1549-1676
language English
publishDate 2014-07-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Medicine
spelling doaj-art-de36a6f12f174072a62965d637f2ff9d2025-08-20T02:22:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762014-07-01117e100167510.1371/journal.pmed.1001675Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru.Tom WingfieldDelia BocciaMarco TovarArquímedes GavinoKarine ZevallosRosario MontoyaKnut LönnrothCarlton A Evans<h4>Background</h4>Even when tuberculosis (TB) treatment is free, hidden costs incurred by patients and their households (TB-affected households) may worsen poverty and health. Extreme TB-associated costs have been termed "catastrophic" but are poorly defined. We studied TB-affected households' hidden costs and their association with adverse TB outcome to create a clinically relevant definition of catastrophic costs.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>From 26 October 2002 to 30 November 2009, TB patients (n = 876, 11% with multi-drug-resistant [MDR] TB) and healthy controls (n = 487) were recruited to a prospective cohort study in shantytowns in Lima, Peru. Patients were interviewed prior to and every 2-4 wk throughout treatment, recording direct (household expenses) and indirect (lost income) TB-related costs. Costs were expressed as a proportion of the household's annual income. In poorer households, costs were lower but constituted a higher proportion of the household's annual income: 27% (95% CI = 20%-43%) in the least-poor houses versus 48% (95% CI = 36%-50%) in the poorest. Adverse TB outcome was defined as death, treatment abandonment or treatment failure during therapy, or recurrence within 2 y. 23% (166/725) of patients with a defined treatment outcome had an adverse outcome. Total costs ≥20% of household annual income was defined as catastrophic because this threshold was most strongly associated with adverse TB outcome. Catastrophic costs were incurred by 345 households (39%). Having MDR TB was associated with a higher likelihood of incurring catastrophic costs (54% [95% CI = 43%-61%] versus 38% [95% CI = 34%-41%], p<0.003). Adverse outcome was independently associated with MDR TB (odds ratio [OR] = 8.4 [95% CI = 4.7-15], p<0.001), previous TB (OR = 2.1 [95% CI = 1.3-3.5], p = 0.005), days too unwell to work pre-treatment (OR = 1.01 [95% CI = 1.00-1.01], p = 0.02), and catastrophic costs (OR = 1.7 [95% CI = 1.1-2.6], p = 0.01). The adjusted population attributable fraction of adverse outcomes explained by catastrophic costs was 18% (95% CI = 6.9%-28%), similar to that of MDR TB (20% [95% CI = 14%-25%]). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that existing catastrophic costs thresholds (≥10% or ≥15% of household annual income) were not associated with adverse outcome in our setting. Study limitations included not measuring certain "dis-saving" variables (including selling household items) and gathering only 6 mo of costs-specific follow-up data for MDR TB patients.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Despite free TB care, having TB disease was expensive for impoverished TB patients in Peru. Incurring higher relative costs was associated with adverse TB outcome. The population attributable fraction indicated that catastrophic costs and MDR TB were associated with similar proportions of adverse outcomes. Thus TB is a socioeconomic as well as infectious problem, and TB control interventions should address both the economic and clinical aspects of this disease. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001675
spellingShingle Tom Wingfield
Delia Boccia
Marco Tovar
Arquímedes Gavino
Karine Zevallos
Rosario Montoya
Knut Lönnroth
Carlton A Evans
Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru.
PLoS Medicine
title Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru.
title_full Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru.
title_fullStr Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru.
title_full_unstemmed Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru.
title_short Defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi-drug resistance: a prospective cohort study, Peru.
title_sort defining catastrophic costs and comparing their importance for adverse tuberculosis outcome with multi drug resistance a prospective cohort study peru
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001675
work_keys_str_mv AT tomwingfield definingcatastrophiccostsandcomparingtheirimportanceforadversetuberculosisoutcomewithmultidrugresistanceaprospectivecohortstudyperu
AT deliaboccia definingcatastrophiccostsandcomparingtheirimportanceforadversetuberculosisoutcomewithmultidrugresistanceaprospectivecohortstudyperu
AT marcotovar definingcatastrophiccostsandcomparingtheirimportanceforadversetuberculosisoutcomewithmultidrugresistanceaprospectivecohortstudyperu
AT arquimedesgavino definingcatastrophiccostsandcomparingtheirimportanceforadversetuberculosisoutcomewithmultidrugresistanceaprospectivecohortstudyperu
AT karinezevallos definingcatastrophiccostsandcomparingtheirimportanceforadversetuberculosisoutcomewithmultidrugresistanceaprospectivecohortstudyperu
AT rosariomontoya definingcatastrophiccostsandcomparingtheirimportanceforadversetuberculosisoutcomewithmultidrugresistanceaprospectivecohortstudyperu
AT knutlonnroth definingcatastrophiccostsandcomparingtheirimportanceforadversetuberculosisoutcomewithmultidrugresistanceaprospectivecohortstudyperu
AT carltonaevans definingcatastrophiccostsandcomparingtheirimportanceforadversetuberculosisoutcomewithmultidrugresistanceaprospectivecohortstudyperu