Evaluation of Routine Enteric Pathogens in Hospitalized Patients: A Canadian Perspective

Diarrhea is a frequently encountered problem in hospitalized patients. Since nosocomial spread of routine enteric pathogens such as Salmonella species, Shigella species, Campylobacter species and Escherichia coli O:157 H:7 seldom occurs, testing for these organisms in patients hospitalized for longe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Gough, Michelle Alfa, Godfrey Harding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1996-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1996/743570
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561669370281984
author Kevin Gough
Michelle Alfa
Godfrey Harding
author_facet Kevin Gough
Michelle Alfa
Godfrey Harding
author_sort Kevin Gough
collection DOAJ
description Diarrhea is a frequently encountered problem in hospitalized patients. Since nosocomial spread of routine enteric pathogens such as Salmonella species, Shigella species, Campylobacter species and Escherichia coli O:157 H:7 seldom occurs, testing for these organisms in patients hospitalized for longer than three days has been questioned. The goal of this study was to determine the length of hospitalization preceding detection of routine enteric pathogens and Clostridium difficile cytotoxin, and to develop guidelines for enteric cultures from hospitalized patients. The enteric pathogens detected in 1991 were C difficile toxin B(+), 77%; Campylobacter species, 10%; Salmonella species, 9%; E coli O:157 H:7, 3%; and Shigella species, 1%. For 1992, these numbers were 86%, 9%, 3%, 2% and 0%, respectively. None of the routine enteric pathogens isolated in 1991 or 1992 was detected in patients after their second day of hospitalization. Routine cultures for enteric pathogens on hospitalized patients were eliminated in February 1993, and physician ordering practices were monitored. With the exception of one campylobacter isolate per year, all routine enteric pathogens isolated in 1993 and 1994 were detected by the second day of hospitalization. Compliance with the changed protocol was 76% measured over a four-month period in 1993 and 74% over the year 1994. Savings of $3,648.10 were associated with rejecting 191 ‘inappropriate’ specimens in 1994. It was concluded that routine enteric cultures are unnecessary for patients hospitalized more than two days, and that appreciable financial savings can be achieved if revised protocols for processing stool cultures are instituted. However, when enteric protocol changes are in place compliance must be evaluated to ensure appropriate utilization.
format Article
id doaj-art-de235c67f8c44797ae05a5e235137018
institution Kabale University
issn 1180-2332
language English
publishDate 1996-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-de235c67f8c44797ae05a5e2351370182025-02-03T01:24:32ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases1180-23321996-01-017319720210.1155/1996/743570Evaluation of Routine Enteric Pathogens in Hospitalized Patients: A Canadian PerspectiveKevin Gough0Michelle Alfa1Godfrey Harding2Departments of Medical Microbiology and Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanadaDepartments of Medical Microbiology and Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanadaDepartments of Medical Microbiology and Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, CanadaDiarrhea is a frequently encountered problem in hospitalized patients. Since nosocomial spread of routine enteric pathogens such as Salmonella species, Shigella species, Campylobacter species and Escherichia coli O:157 H:7 seldom occurs, testing for these organisms in patients hospitalized for longer than three days has been questioned. The goal of this study was to determine the length of hospitalization preceding detection of routine enteric pathogens and Clostridium difficile cytotoxin, and to develop guidelines for enteric cultures from hospitalized patients. The enteric pathogens detected in 1991 were C difficile toxin B(+), 77%; Campylobacter species, 10%; Salmonella species, 9%; E coli O:157 H:7, 3%; and Shigella species, 1%. For 1992, these numbers were 86%, 9%, 3%, 2% and 0%, respectively. None of the routine enteric pathogens isolated in 1991 or 1992 was detected in patients after their second day of hospitalization. Routine cultures for enteric pathogens on hospitalized patients were eliminated in February 1993, and physician ordering practices were monitored. With the exception of one campylobacter isolate per year, all routine enteric pathogens isolated in 1993 and 1994 were detected by the second day of hospitalization. Compliance with the changed protocol was 76% measured over a four-month period in 1993 and 74% over the year 1994. Savings of $3,648.10 were associated with rejecting 191 ‘inappropriate’ specimens in 1994. It was concluded that routine enteric cultures are unnecessary for patients hospitalized more than two days, and that appreciable financial savings can be achieved if revised protocols for processing stool cultures are instituted. However, when enteric protocol changes are in place compliance must be evaluated to ensure appropriate utilization.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1996/743570
spellingShingle Kevin Gough
Michelle Alfa
Godfrey Harding
Evaluation of Routine Enteric Pathogens in Hospitalized Patients: A Canadian Perspective
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
title Evaluation of Routine Enteric Pathogens in Hospitalized Patients: A Canadian Perspective
title_full Evaluation of Routine Enteric Pathogens in Hospitalized Patients: A Canadian Perspective
title_fullStr Evaluation of Routine Enteric Pathogens in Hospitalized Patients: A Canadian Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Routine Enteric Pathogens in Hospitalized Patients: A Canadian Perspective
title_short Evaluation of Routine Enteric Pathogens in Hospitalized Patients: A Canadian Perspective
title_sort evaluation of routine enteric pathogens in hospitalized patients a canadian perspective
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1996/743570
work_keys_str_mv AT kevingough evaluationofroutineentericpathogensinhospitalizedpatientsacanadianperspective
AT michellealfa evaluationofroutineentericpathogensinhospitalizedpatientsacanadianperspective
AT godfreyharding evaluationofroutineentericpathogensinhospitalizedpatientsacanadianperspective