Comparison of Rat Connective Tissue Response to BioMTA, Angelus MTA, and Root MTA
Due to the widespread use of MTA in dentistry and various brands of this product, we decided to compare the three brands available in the country market by their biocompatibility. We divided 20 male Wistar rats into four groups. After local anesthesia and washing, we made two incisions on both sides...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Marzieh Alimohammadi, Sina Mirzaee-Rad, Farideh Feizi, Hadi Shirzad Juybari, Akam Saeidi, Hemmat Gholinia |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Biomaterials |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7415302 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Chemistry and Bioactivity of NeoMTA Plus™ versus MTA Angelus® Root Repair Materials
by: Sawsan T. Abu Zeid, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Effect of Fluorohydroxyapatite on Biological and Physical Properties of MTA Angelus
by: Behnam Bolhari, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of a new Harvard MTA compared to MTA Flow and ProRoot MTA on human gingival fibroblasts
by: Abdel-Rahman Youssef, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01) -
Effect of Bio MTA plus & ProRoot MTA pulp capping materials on the regenerative properties of human dental pulp stem cells
by: Khaled Mohamed Ayoub, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
A comparative study of the physicochemical properties of hesperidin, MTA-Angelus and calcium hydroxide as pulp capping materials
by: Ebtesam O. Abo El-Mal, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)