Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted versus open reduction and fixation for treating scaphoid fractures

Abstract Objectives Scaphoid fractures represent the most common type of carpal fracture. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy of wrist arthroscopy-assisted fixation versus conventional open reduction with fixation for scaphoid fractures. Methods We condu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaolong Du, Xuehai Ou, Jidong Liang, Chao Liu, Qianjin Zheng, Shaoyan Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02961-2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849705136195108864
author Xiaolong Du
Xuehai Ou
Jidong Liang
Chao Liu
Qianjin Zheng
Shaoyan Shi
author_facet Xiaolong Du
Xuehai Ou
Jidong Liang
Chao Liu
Qianjin Zheng
Shaoyan Shi
author_sort Xiaolong Du
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Scaphoid fractures represent the most common type of carpal fracture. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy of wrist arthroscopy-assisted fixation versus conventional open reduction with fixation for scaphoid fractures. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 159 patients with acute scaphoid fractures. Participants were stratified into two groups: the open reduction with fixation group (underwent open reduction and fixation) and the Arthroscopy group (received wrist arthroscopy-assisted fixation). Comparative analyses included operative duration, hospitalization length, fracture union time, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores. Wrist functionality and range of motion were assessed using the Mayo wrist joint function scoring scale. Additionally, patient satisfaction was evaluated through a standardized questionnaire. Results Following propensity score matching (PSM), 54 matched pairs were analyzed. Baseline characteristics showed no significant intergroup differences. The Arthroscopy group exhibited statistically superior outcomes, including shorter operative time, reduced hospitalization, accelerated fracture union, and lower postoperative VAS scores. Mayo Wrist Scores were significantly higher in the Arthroscopy group, indicating better functional recovery. Furthermore, the Arthroscopy group demonstrated a lower overall complication rate and significantly improved scores in both physical and psychological assessment domains. Conclusions Wrist arthroscopy-assisted fixation significantly enhances postoperative recovery, yielding superior functional outcomes, reduced complications, and higher patient satisfaction compared to the open reduction with fixation group. This technique represents a promising approach for optimizing scaphoid fracture management.
format Article
id doaj-art-ddec1d9e0911465cb99ef67bb9aa7377
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-2482
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Surgery
spelling doaj-art-ddec1d9e0911465cb99ef67bb9aa73772025-08-20T03:16:33ZengBMCBMC Surgery1471-24822025-05-012511710.1186/s12893-025-02961-2Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted versus open reduction and fixation for treating scaphoid fracturesXiaolong Du0Xuehai Ou1Jidong Liang2Chao Liu3Qianjin Zheng4Shaoyan Shi5Department of Hand Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityDepartment of Hand Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityDepartment of Hand Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityDepartment of Hand Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityDepartment of Hand Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityDepartment of Hand Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityAbstract Objectives Scaphoid fractures represent the most common type of carpal fracture. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate and compare the therapeutic efficacy of wrist arthroscopy-assisted fixation versus conventional open reduction with fixation for scaphoid fractures. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 159 patients with acute scaphoid fractures. Participants were stratified into two groups: the open reduction with fixation group (underwent open reduction and fixation) and the Arthroscopy group (received wrist arthroscopy-assisted fixation). Comparative analyses included operative duration, hospitalization length, fracture union time, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores. Wrist functionality and range of motion were assessed using the Mayo wrist joint function scoring scale. Additionally, patient satisfaction was evaluated through a standardized questionnaire. Results Following propensity score matching (PSM), 54 matched pairs were analyzed. Baseline characteristics showed no significant intergroup differences. The Arthroscopy group exhibited statistically superior outcomes, including shorter operative time, reduced hospitalization, accelerated fracture union, and lower postoperative VAS scores. Mayo Wrist Scores were significantly higher in the Arthroscopy group, indicating better functional recovery. Furthermore, the Arthroscopy group demonstrated a lower overall complication rate and significantly improved scores in both physical and psychological assessment domains. Conclusions Wrist arthroscopy-assisted fixation significantly enhances postoperative recovery, yielding superior functional outcomes, reduced complications, and higher patient satisfaction compared to the open reduction with fixation group. This technique represents a promising approach for optimizing scaphoid fracture management.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02961-2BoneScaphoid fractureWrist arthroscopy-assisted fixationOpen reduction and fixation
spellingShingle Xiaolong Du
Xuehai Ou
Jidong Liang
Chao Liu
Qianjin Zheng
Shaoyan Shi
Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted versus open reduction and fixation for treating scaphoid fractures
BMC Surgery
Bone
Scaphoid fracture
Wrist arthroscopy-assisted fixation
Open reduction and fixation
title Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted versus open reduction and fixation for treating scaphoid fractures
title_full Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted versus open reduction and fixation for treating scaphoid fractures
title_fullStr Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted versus open reduction and fixation for treating scaphoid fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted versus open reduction and fixation for treating scaphoid fractures
title_short Comparison of arthroscopy-assisted versus open reduction and fixation for treating scaphoid fractures
title_sort comparison of arthroscopy assisted versus open reduction and fixation for treating scaphoid fractures
topic Bone
Scaphoid fracture
Wrist arthroscopy-assisted fixation
Open reduction and fixation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02961-2
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaolongdu comparisonofarthroscopyassistedversusopenreductionandfixationfortreatingscaphoidfractures
AT xuehaiou comparisonofarthroscopyassistedversusopenreductionandfixationfortreatingscaphoidfractures
AT jidongliang comparisonofarthroscopyassistedversusopenreductionandfixationfortreatingscaphoidfractures
AT chaoliu comparisonofarthroscopyassistedversusopenreductionandfixationfortreatingscaphoidfractures
AT qianjinzheng comparisonofarthroscopyassistedversusopenreductionandfixationfortreatingscaphoidfractures
AT shaoyanshi comparisonofarthroscopyassistedversusopenreductionandfixationfortreatingscaphoidfractures